From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 0/3] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 01:32:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200123013206.8499-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
The IMA subsystem supports measuring asymmetric keys when the key is
created or updated[1]. But keys created or updated before a custom IMA
policy is loaded are currently not measured. This includes keys added,
for instance, to either the .ima or .builtin_trusted_keys keyrings, which
happens early in the boot process.
Measuring the early boot keys, by design, requires loading a custom IMA
policy. This change adds support for queuing keys created or updated
before a custom IMA policy is loaded. The queued keys are processed when
a custom policy is loaded. Keys created or updated after a custom policy
is loaded are measured immediately (not queued). In the case when a
custom policy is not loaded within 5 minutes of IMA initialization, the
queued keys are freed.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191211164707.4698-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/
Changelog:
v9
=> Rebased the changes to v5.5-rc7
=> Defined an intermediate Kconfig boolean option namely
IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS to declare the deferred key
measurement functions.
=> Use delayed workqueue to free the queued keys when a custom IMA
policy is not loaded.
v8
=> Rebased the changes to linux-next
=> Need to apply the following patch first
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20200108160508.5938-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/
v7
=> Updated cover letter per Mimi's suggestions.
=> Updated "Reported-by" tag to be specific about
the issues fixed in the patch.
v6
=> Replaced mutex with a spinlock to sychronize access to
queued keys. This fixes the problem reported by
"kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>"
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/2a831fe9-30e5-63b4-af10-a69f327f7fb7@linux.microsoft.com/T/#t
=> Changed ima_queue_key() to a static function. This fixes
the issue reported by "kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>"
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1577370464.4487.10.camel@linux.ibm.com/
=> Added the patch to free the queued keys if a custom IMA policy
was not loaded to this patch set.
v5
=> Removed temp keys list in ima_process_queued_keys()
v4
=> Check and set ima_process_keys flag with mutex held.
v3
=> Defined ima_process_keys flag to be static.
=> Set ima_process_keys with ima_keys_mutex held.
=> Added a comment in ima_process_queued_keys() function
to state the use of temporary list for keys.
v2
=> Rebased the changes to v5.5-rc1
=> Updated function names, variable names, and code comments
to be less verbose.
v1
=> Code cleanup
v0
=> Based changes on v5.4-rc8
=> The following patchsets should be applied in that order
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1572492694-6520-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191204224131.3384-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/
=> Added functions to queue and dequeue keys, and process
the queued keys when custom IMA policies are applied.
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian (3):
IMA: Define workqueue for early boot key measurements
IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys
IMA: Defined delayed workqueue to free the queued keys
security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 5 +
security/integrity/ima/Makefile | 1 +
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 24 +++
security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c | 8 +
security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 8 +-
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 +
security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
--
2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: zohar@linux.ibm.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 0/3] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:32:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200123013206.8499-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
The IMA subsystem supports measuring asymmetric keys when the key is
created or updated[1]. But keys created or updated before a custom IMA
policy is loaded are currently not measured. This includes keys added,
for instance, to either the .ima or .builtin_trusted_keys keyrings, which
happens early in the boot process.
Measuring the early boot keys, by design, requires loading a custom IMA
policy. This change adds support for queuing keys created or updated
before a custom IMA policy is loaded. The queued keys are processed when
a custom policy is loaded. Keys created or updated after a custom policy
is loaded are measured immediately (not queued). In the case when a
custom policy is not loaded within 5 minutes of IMA initialization, the
queued keys are freed.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191211164707.4698-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/
Changelog:
v9
=> Rebased the changes to v5.5-rc7
=> Defined an intermediate Kconfig boolean option namely
IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS to declare the deferred key
measurement functions.
=> Use delayed workqueue to free the queued keys when a custom IMA
policy is not loaded.
v8
=> Rebased the changes to linux-next
=> Need to apply the following patch first
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20200108160508.5938-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/
v7
=> Updated cover letter per Mimi's suggestions.
=> Updated "Reported-by" tag to be specific about
the issues fixed in the patch.
v6
=> Replaced mutex with a spinlock to sychronize access to
queued keys. This fixes the problem reported by
"kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>"
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/2a831fe9-30e5-63b4-af10-a69f327f7fb7@linux.microsoft.com/T/#t
=> Changed ima_queue_key() to a static function. This fixes
the issue reported by "kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>"
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1577370464.4487.10.camel@linux.ibm.com/
=> Added the patch to free the queued keys if a custom IMA policy
was not loaded to this patch set.
v5
=> Removed temp keys list in ima_process_queued_keys()
v4
=> Check and set ima_process_keys flag with mutex held.
v3
=> Defined ima_process_keys flag to be static.
=> Set ima_process_keys with ima_keys_mutex held.
=> Added a comment in ima_process_queued_keys() function
to state the use of temporary list for keys.
v2
=> Rebased the changes to v5.5-rc1
=> Updated function names, variable names, and code comments
to be less verbose.
v1
=> Code cleanup
v0
=> Based changes on v5.4-rc8
=> The following patchsets should be applied in that order
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/1572492694-6520-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191204224131.3384-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com/
=> Added functions to queue and dequeue keys, and process
the queued keys when custom IMA policies are applied.
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian (3):
IMA: Define workqueue for early boot key measurements
IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys
IMA: Defined delayed workqueue to free the queued keys
security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 5 +
security/integrity/ima/Makefile | 1 +
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 24 +++
security/integrity/ima/ima_asymmetric_keys.c | 8 +
security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 8 +-
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 +
security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-23 1:32 Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [this message]
2020-01-23 1:32 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] IMA: Deferred measurement of keys Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-23 1:32 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] IMA: Define workqueue for early boot key measurements Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-23 1:32 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-23 14:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-23 14:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-01-23 1:32 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] IMA: Call workqueue functions to measure queued keys Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-23 1:32 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-23 1:32 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] IMA: Defined delayed workqueue to free the " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-23 1:32 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200123013206.8499-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.