From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Cc: swboyd@chromium.org, agross@kernel.org, david.brown@linaro.org,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
dianders@chromium.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
ilina@codeaurora.org, lsrao@codeaurora.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add cpuidle low power states
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:15:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204231509.GB18972@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1580736940-6985-7-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:05:39PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Add device bindings for cpuidle states for cpu devices.
>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> index 8011c5f..0aa0ced 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@
> compatible = "arm,armv8";
> reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> enable-method = "psci";
> + cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
> + &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1
> + &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
These entries are deleted again by the next patch in this series ('arm64:
dts: qcom: sc7180: Convert to the hierarchical CPU topology layout').
What is the point in adding them in the first place?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Cc: dianders@chromium.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
lsrao@codeaurora.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com,
rnayak@codeaurora.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
swboyd@chromium.org, david.brown@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
ilina@codeaurora.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add cpuidle low power states
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:15:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204231509.GB18972@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1580736940-6985-7-git-send-email-mkshah@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:05:39PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
> Add device bindings for cpuidle states for cpu devices.
>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> index 8011c5f..0aa0ced 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@
> compatible = "arm,armv8";
> reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> enable-method = "psci";
> + cpu-idle-states = <&LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_0
> + &LITTLE_CPU_SLEEP_1
> + &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
These entries are deleted again by the next patch in this series ('arm64:
dts: qcom: sc7180: Convert to the hierarchical CPU topology layout').
What is the point in adding them in the first place?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 13:35 [PATCH v3 0/7] Add RSC power domain support Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drivers: qcom: rpmh: fix macro to accept NULL argument Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drivers: qcom: rpmh: remove rpmh_flush export Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Add RSC power domain specifier Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Add RSC power domain support Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Add hierarchical domain idle states converter Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 17:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-03 17:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-04 4:52 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-04 4:52 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-04 15:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-04 15:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-05 12:23 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-05 12:23 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-05 14:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-05 14:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-05 15:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-05 15:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-05 16:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-05 16:18 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-06 8:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-06 8:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-06 20:45 ` Lina Iyer
2020-02-06 20:45 ` Lina Iyer
2020-02-07 11:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 11:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 12:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-07 12:32 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-07 14:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-07 14:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-02-07 15:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-07 15:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-07 16:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 16:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-08 10:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-08 10:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-02-10 10:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-10 10:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 16:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 16:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-06 21:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-06 21:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-07 11:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 11:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add cpuidle low power states Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-04 23:15 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2020-02-04 23:15 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-02-05 12:07 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-05 12:07 ` Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Convert to the hierarchical CPU topology layout Maulik Shah
2020-02-03 13:35 ` Maulik Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200204231509.GB18972@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsrao@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.