From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dax, pmem: Add a dax operation zero_page_range
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:34:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200206143443.GB12036@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iY=gw86UDLqpiCtathGXRUuxOMuU=unwxzA-cm=0x+Sg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:40:44PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:30:50AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * There are no users as of now. Once users are there, fix dm code
> > > > + * to be able to split a long range across targets.
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > This comment confused me. I think this wants to say something like:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * There are now callers that want to zero across a page boundary as of
> > > * now. Once there are users this check can be removed after the
> > > * device mapper code has been updated to split ranges across targets.
> > > */
> >
> > Yes, that's what I wanted to say but I missed one line. Thanks. Will fix
> > it.
> >
> > >
> > > > +static int pmem_dax_zero_page_range(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
> > > > + unsigned int offset, size_t len)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int rc = 0;
> > > > + phys_addr_t phys_pos = pgoff * PAGE_SIZE + offset;
> > >
> > > Any reason not to pass a phys_addr_t in the calling convention for the
> > > method and maybe also for dax_zero_page_range itself?
> >
> > I don't have any reason not to pass phys_addr_t. If that sounds better,
> > will make changes.
>
> The problem is device-mapper. That wants to use offset to route
> through the map to the leaf device. If it weren't for the firmware
> communication requirement you could do:
>
> dax_direct_access(...)
> generic_dax_zero_page_range(...)
>
> ...but as long as the firmware error clearing path is required I think
> we need to do pass the pgoff through the interface and do the pgoff to
> virt / phys translation inside the ops handler.
Hi Dan,
Drivers can easily convert offset into dax device (say phys_addr_t) to
pgoff and offset into page, isn't it?
pgoff_t = phys_addr_t/PAGE_SIZE;
offset = phys_addr_t & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
And pgoff can easily be converted into sectors which dm/md can use for
mapping and come up with pgoff in target device.
Anyway, I am fine with anything.
Thanks
Vivek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dax, pmem: Add a dax operation zero_page_range
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:34:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200206143443.GB12036@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4iY=gw86UDLqpiCtathGXRUuxOMuU=unwxzA-cm=0x+Sg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 04:40:44PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:30:50AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * There are no users as of now. Once users are there, fix dm code
> > > > + * to be able to split a long range across targets.
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > This comment confused me. I think this wants to say something like:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * There are now callers that want to zero across a page boundary as of
> > > * now. Once there are users this check can be removed after the
> > > * device mapper code has been updated to split ranges across targets.
> > > */
> >
> > Yes, that's what I wanted to say but I missed one line. Thanks. Will fix
> > it.
> >
> > >
> > > > +static int pmem_dax_zero_page_range(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
> > > > + unsigned int offset, size_t len)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int rc = 0;
> > > > + phys_addr_t phys_pos = pgoff * PAGE_SIZE + offset;
> > >
> > > Any reason not to pass a phys_addr_t in the calling convention for the
> > > method and maybe also for dax_zero_page_range itself?
> >
> > I don't have any reason not to pass phys_addr_t. If that sounds better,
> > will make changes.
>
> The problem is device-mapper. That wants to use offset to route
> through the map to the leaf device. If it weren't for the firmware
> communication requirement you could do:
>
> dax_direct_access(...)
> generic_dax_zero_page_range(...)
>
> ...but as long as the firmware error clearing path is required I think
> we need to do pass the pgoff through the interface and do the pgoff to
> virt / phys translation inside the ops handler.
Hi Dan,
Drivers can easily convert offset into dax device (say phys_addr_t) to
pgoff and offset into page, isn't it?
pgoff_t = phys_addr_t/PAGE_SIZE;
offset = phys_addr_t & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
And pgoff can easily be converted into sectors which dm/md can use for
mapping and come up with pgoff in target device.
Anyway, I am fine with anything.
Thanks
Vivek
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 20:00 [RFC PATCH 0/5][V2] dax,pmem: Provide a dax operation to zero range of memory Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] dax, pmem: Add a dax operation zero_page_range Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 18:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 18:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 20:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 20:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-06 0:40 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-06 0:40 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-06 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-06 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-07 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 17:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 17:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 17:06 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 17:06 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-06 14:34 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-02-06 14:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 16:58 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390,dax: Add dax zero_page_range operation to dcssblk driver Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 18:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 18:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 20:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 20:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm,dax: Add dax zero_page_range operation Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 18:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 18:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-07 16:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 16:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] dax,iomap: Start using dax native zero_page_range() Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 18:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 18:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 20:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 20:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 15:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] dax,iomap: Add helper dax_iomap_zero() to zero a range Vivek Goyal
2020-02-03 20:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-04 5:17 ` kbuild test robot
2020-02-04 5:17 ` kbuild test robot
2020-02-04 5:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] dax, iomap: " kbuild test robot
2020-02-04 5:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] dax,iomap: " kbuild test robot
2020-02-05 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05 20:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-05 20:15 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200206143443.GB12036@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.