From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
hch@infradead.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] pmem: Add functions for reading/writing page to/from pmem
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:26:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207202652.1439-2-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207202652.1439-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
This splits pmem_do_bvec() into pmem_do_read() and pmem_do_write().
pmem_do_write() will be used by pmem zero_page_range() as well. Hence
sharing the same code.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
index ad8e4df1282b..9ad07cb8c9fc 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
@@ -136,9 +136,25 @@ static blk_status_t read_pmem(struct page *page, unsigned int off,
return BLK_STS_OK;
}
-static blk_status_t pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,
- unsigned int len, unsigned int off, unsigned int op,
- sector_t sector)
+static blk_status_t pmem_do_read(struct pmem_device *pmem,
+ struct page *page, unsigned int page_off,
+ sector_t sector, unsigned int len)
+{
+ blk_status_t rc;
+ phys_addr_t pmem_off = sector * 512 + pmem->data_offset;
+ void *pmem_addr = pmem->virt_addr + pmem_off;
+
+ if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len)))
+ return BLK_STS_IOERR;
+
+ rc = read_pmem(page, page_off, pmem_addr, len);
+ flush_dcache_page(page);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static blk_status_t pmem_do_write(struct pmem_device *pmem,
+ struct page *page, unsigned int page_off,
+ sector_t sector, unsigned int len)
{
blk_status_t rc = BLK_STS_OK;
bool bad_pmem = false;
@@ -148,39 +164,40 @@ static blk_status_t pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,
if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len)))
bad_pmem = true;
- if (!op_is_write(op)) {
- if (unlikely(bad_pmem))
- rc = BLK_STS_IOERR;
- else {
- rc = read_pmem(page, off, pmem_addr, len);
- flush_dcache_page(page);
- }
- } else {
- /*
- * Note that we write the data both before and after
- * clearing poison. The write before clear poison
- * handles situations where the latest written data is
- * preserved and the clear poison operation simply marks
- * the address range as valid without changing the data.
- * In this case application software can assume that an
- * interrupted write will either return the new good
- * data or an error.
- *
- * However, if pmem_clear_poison() leaves the data in an
- * indeterminate state we need to perform the write
- * after clear poison.
- */
- flush_dcache_page(page);
- write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, off, len);
- if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) {
- rc = pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
- write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, off, len);
- }
+ /*
+ * Note that we write the data both before and after
+ * clearing poison. The write before clear poison
+ * handles situations where the latest written data is
+ * preserved and the clear poison operation simply marks
+ * the address range as valid without changing the data.
+ * In this case application software can assume that an
+ * interrupted write will either return the new good
+ * data or an error.
+ *
+ * However, if pmem_clear_poison() leaves the data in an
+ * indeterminate state we need to perform the write
+ * after clear poison.
+ */
+ flush_dcache_page(page);
+ write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, page_off, len);
+ if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) {
+ rc = pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
+ write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, page_off, len);
}
return rc;
}
+static blk_status_t pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,
+ unsigned int len, unsigned int off, unsigned int op,
+ sector_t sector)
+{
+ if (!op_is_write(op))
+ return pmem_do_read(pmem, page, off, sector, len);
+
+ return pmem_do_write(pmem, page, off, sector, len);
+}
+
static blk_qc_t pmem_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
{
int ret = 0;
--
2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
hch@infradead.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] pmem: Add functions for reading/writing page to/from pmem
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:26:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207202652.1439-2-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207202652.1439-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
This splits pmem_do_bvec() into pmem_do_read() and pmem_do_write().
pmem_do_write() will be used by pmem zero_page_range() as well. Hence
sharing the same code.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
index ad8e4df1282b..9ad07cb8c9fc 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
@@ -136,9 +136,25 @@ static blk_status_t read_pmem(struct page *page, unsigned int off,
return BLK_STS_OK;
}
-static blk_status_t pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,
- unsigned int len, unsigned int off, unsigned int op,
- sector_t sector)
+static blk_status_t pmem_do_read(struct pmem_device *pmem,
+ struct page *page, unsigned int page_off,
+ sector_t sector, unsigned int len)
+{
+ blk_status_t rc;
+ phys_addr_t pmem_off = sector * 512 + pmem->data_offset;
+ void *pmem_addr = pmem->virt_addr + pmem_off;
+
+ if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len)))
+ return BLK_STS_IOERR;
+
+ rc = read_pmem(page, page_off, pmem_addr, len);
+ flush_dcache_page(page);
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static blk_status_t pmem_do_write(struct pmem_device *pmem,
+ struct page *page, unsigned int page_off,
+ sector_t sector, unsigned int len)
{
blk_status_t rc = BLK_STS_OK;
bool bad_pmem = false;
@@ -148,39 +164,40 @@ static blk_status_t pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,
if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len)))
bad_pmem = true;
- if (!op_is_write(op)) {
- if (unlikely(bad_pmem))
- rc = BLK_STS_IOERR;
- else {
- rc = read_pmem(page, off, pmem_addr, len);
- flush_dcache_page(page);
- }
- } else {
- /*
- * Note that we write the data both before and after
- * clearing poison. The write before clear poison
- * handles situations where the latest written data is
- * preserved and the clear poison operation simply marks
- * the address range as valid without changing the data.
- * In this case application software can assume that an
- * interrupted write will either return the new good
- * data or an error.
- *
- * However, if pmem_clear_poison() leaves the data in an
- * indeterminate state we need to perform the write
- * after clear poison.
- */
- flush_dcache_page(page);
- write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, off, len);
- if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) {
- rc = pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
- write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, off, len);
- }
+ /*
+ * Note that we write the data both before and after
+ * clearing poison. The write before clear poison
+ * handles situations where the latest written data is
+ * preserved and the clear poison operation simply marks
+ * the address range as valid without changing the data.
+ * In this case application software can assume that an
+ * interrupted write will either return the new good
+ * data or an error.
+ *
+ * However, if pmem_clear_poison() leaves the data in an
+ * indeterminate state we need to perform the write
+ * after clear poison.
+ */
+ flush_dcache_page(page);
+ write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, page_off, len);
+ if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) {
+ rc = pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
+ write_pmem(pmem_addr, page, page_off, len);
}
return rc;
}
+static blk_status_t pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,
+ unsigned int len, unsigned int off, unsigned int op,
+ sector_t sector)
+{
+ if (!op_is_write(op))
+ return pmem_do_read(pmem, page, off, sector, len);
+
+ return pmem_do_write(pmem, page, off, sector, len);
+}
+
static blk_qc_t pmem_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
{
int ret = 0;
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 20:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] dax,pmem: Provide a dax operation to zero range of memory Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-02-07 20:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] pmem: Add functions for reading/writing page to/from pmem Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 18:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 18:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] pmem: Enable pmem_do_write() to deal with arbitrary ranges Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 14:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 14:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] dax, pmem: Add a dax operation zero_page_range Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 18:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 18:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] s390,dcssblk,dax: Add dax zero_page_range operation to dcssblk driver Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-10 20:53 ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-02-10 20:53 ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-02-11 15:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-11 15:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-11 15:49 ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-02-11 15:49 ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-02-07 20:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] dm,dax: Add dax zero_page_range operation Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] dax,iomap: Start using dax native zero_page_range() Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-07 20:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] dax,iomap: Add helper dax_iomap_zero() to zero a range Vivek Goyal
2020-02-07 20:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-17 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-17 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-14 12:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] dax,pmem: Provide a dax operation to zero range of memory Vivek Goyal
2020-02-14 12:57 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200207202652.1439-2-vgoyal@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.