From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] KVM: x86: remove redundant WARN_ON check of an unsigned less than zero
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 00:47:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200208004722.GB15581@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207231813.786224-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:18:13PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check cpu->hv_clock.system_time < 0 is redundant since system_time
> is a u64 and hence can never be less than zero. Remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fbabb2f06273..d4967ac47e68 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2448,7 +2448,6 @@ static int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = tsc_timestamp;
> vcpu->hv_clock.system_time = kernel_ns + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset;
> vcpu->last_guest_tsc = tsc_timestamp;
> - WARN_ON(vcpu->hv_clock.system_time < 0);
Don't know this code well, but @kernel_ns and @v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset
are both s64, so maybe this was intended and/or desirable?
WARN_ON((s64)vcpu->hv_clock.system_time < 0);
> /* If the host uses TSC clocksource, then it is stable */
> pvclock_flags = 0;
> --
> 2.24.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] KVM: x86: remove redundant WARN_ON check of an unsigned less than zero
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 16:47:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200208004722.GB15581@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207231813.786224-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:18:13PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The check cpu->hv_clock.system_time < 0 is redundant since system_time
> is a u64 and hence can never be less than zero. Remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Macro compares unsigned to 0")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fbabb2f06273..d4967ac47e68 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2448,7 +2448,6 @@ static int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = tsc_timestamp;
> vcpu->hv_clock.system_time = kernel_ns + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset;
> vcpu->last_guest_tsc = tsc_timestamp;
> - WARN_ON(vcpu->hv_clock.system_time < 0);
Don't know this code well, but @kernel_ns and @v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset
are both s64, so maybe this was intended and/or desirable?
WARN_ON((s64)vcpu->hv_clock.system_time < 0);
> /* If the host uses TSC clocksource, then it is stable */
> pvclock_flags = 0;
> --
> 2.24.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-08 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 23:18 [PATCH][next] KVM: x86: remove redundant WARN_ON check of an unsigned less than zero Colin King
2020-02-07 23:18 ` Colin King
2020-02-08 0:47 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-02-08 0:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-08 12:09 ` Colin Ian King
2020-02-08 12:09 ` Colin Ian King
2020-02-12 12:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-12 12:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200208004722.GB15581@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.