From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:02:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211120253.GB52147@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB44814779B2307B20598E598288190@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:59:43AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports
> >
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports, so add into devicetree binding doc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > index f493d69e6194..03cff8b55a93 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Required properties:
> >
> > The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/
> > node.
> >
> > -- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi"
> > +- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc"
>
> One question here, are you fine with compatible "arm,scmi-smc" or
> add a new property 'transport' such as:
Not required.
> transport = "mailbox"; for mailbox
> transport = "smc"; for smc and hvc.
>
Each transport will have it's own specific property like mailboxes for
mailbox, smc/hvc function IDs for SMC/HVC. That should be sufficient.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:02:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211120253.GB52147@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB44814779B2307B20598E598288190@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:59:43AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports
> >
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports, so add into devicetree binding doc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > index f493d69e6194..03cff8b55a93 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Required properties:
> >
> > The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/
> > node.
> >
> > -- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi"
> > +- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc"
>
> One question here, are you fine with compatible "arm,scmi-smc" or
> add a new property 'transport' such as:
Not required.
> transport = "mailbox"; for mailbox
> transport = "smc"; for smc and hvc.
>
Each transport will have it's own specific property like mailboxes for
mailbox, smc/hvc function IDs for SMC/HVC. That should be sufficient.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 13:01 [PATCH 0/2] firmware: arm_scmi: add smc/hvc transports support peng.fan
2020-02-06 13:01 ` peng.fan
2020-02-06 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports peng.fan
2020-02-06 13:01 ` peng.fan
2020-02-06 21:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-06 21:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-02-07 8:10 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 8:10 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 10:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 10:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 10:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 10:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 10:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 10:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 10:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 10:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 11:00 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 11:00 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 11:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 11:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 11:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 11:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 11:46 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 11:46 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 10:55 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 10:55 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 11:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 11:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-07 11:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 11:06 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-07 11:19 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-07 11:19 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-10 0:59 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-10 0:59 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-11 12:02 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-02-11 12:02 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-06 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: " peng.fan
2020-02-06 13:01 ` peng.fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200211120253.GB52147@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.