From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:32:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213093227.GA90266@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157966229575.2508551.1892426244277171485.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently x86 numa_meminfo is marked __initdata in the
> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n case. In support of a new facility to allow
> drivers to map reserved memory to a 'target_node'
> (phys_to_target_node()), add support for removing the __initdata
> designation for those users. Both memory hotplug and
> phys_to_target_node() users select CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA to tell the arch to
> maintain its physical address to numa mapping infrastructure post init.
>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 6 +-----
> include/linux/numa.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
The concept and the x86 portions look sane, just a few minor nits:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index 99f7a68738f0..5289d9d6799a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -25,11 +25,7 @@ nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
>
> -static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo
> -#ifndef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> -__initdata
> -#endif
> -;
> +static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo __initdata_numa;
>
> static int numa_distance_cnt;
> static u8 *numa_distance;
> diff --git a/include/linux/numa.h b/include/linux/numa.h
> index 20f4e44b186c..c005ed6b807b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/numa.h
> +++ b/include/linux/numa.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@
>
> #define NUMA_NO_NODE (-1)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA
> +#define __initdata_numa
> +#else
> +#define __initdata_numa __initdata
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> int numa_map_to_online_node(int node);
> #else
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index ab80933be65f..001f1185eadf 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ config HAVE_FAST_GUP
> config ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
> bool
>
> +# Keep arch numa mapping infrastructure post-init.
s/numa/NUMA
Please also capitalize consistently in the rest of the series.
> +config KEEP_NUMA
> + bool
So most of our recent new NUMA options followed the naming pattern of:
CONFIG_NUMA_*
Such as CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING or CONFIG_NUMA_EMU.
So I'd suggesting naming it to CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP, or, a bit more
descriptively, such as CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MAPPING or such?
'Keeping NUMA' is kind of lame - of course we keep NUMA. ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
vishal.l.verma@intel.com, hch@lst.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:32:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213093227.GA90266@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157966229575.2508551.1892426244277171485.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently x86 numa_meminfo is marked __initdata in the
> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n case. In support of a new facility to allow
> drivers to map reserved memory to a 'target_node'
> (phys_to_target_node()), add support for removing the __initdata
> designation for those users. Both memory hotplug and
> phys_to_target_node() users select CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA to tell the arch to
> maintain its physical address to numa mapping infrastructure post init.
>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 6 +-----
> include/linux/numa.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
The concept and the x86 portions look sane, just a few minor nits:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index 99f7a68738f0..5289d9d6799a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -25,11 +25,7 @@ nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
> struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
>
> -static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo
> -#ifndef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> -__initdata
> -#endif
> -;
> +static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo __initdata_numa;
>
> static int numa_distance_cnt;
> static u8 *numa_distance;
> diff --git a/include/linux/numa.h b/include/linux/numa.h
> index 20f4e44b186c..c005ed6b807b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/numa.h
> +++ b/include/linux/numa.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,12 @@
>
> #define NUMA_NO_NODE (-1)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA
> +#define __initdata_numa
> +#else
> +#define __initdata_numa __initdata
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> int numa_map_to_online_node(int node);
> #else
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index ab80933be65f..001f1185eadf 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ config HAVE_FAST_GUP
> config ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
> bool
>
> +# Keep arch numa mapping infrastructure post-init.
s/numa/NUMA
Please also capitalize consistently in the rest of the series.
> +config KEEP_NUMA
> + bool
So most of our recent new NUMA options followed the naming pattern of:
CONFIG_NUMA_*
Such as CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING or CONFIG_NUMA_EMU.
So I'd suggesting naming it to CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP, or, a bit more
descriptively, such as CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MAPPING or such?
'Keeping NUMA' is kind of lame - of course we keep NUMA. ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-22 3:04 [PATCH v4 0/6] Memory Hierarchy: Enable target node lookups for reserved memory Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] ACPI: NUMA: Up-level "map to online node" functionality Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] mm/numa: Skip NUMA_NO_NODE and online nodes in numa_map_to_online_node() Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] powerpc/papr_scm: Switch to numa_map_to_online_node() Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_KEEP_NUMA Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:04 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2020-02-13 9:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-02-13 21:19 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 21:19 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 11:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-13 11:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-13 21:21 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 21:21 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86/numa: Provide a range-to-target_node lookup facility Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:05 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-02-13 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-02-13 11:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-13 11:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-13 21:40 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 21:40 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:05 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] libnvdimm/e820: Retrieve and populate correct 'target_node' info Dan Williams
2020-01-22 3:05 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 2:28 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Memory Hierarchy: Enable target node lookups for reserved memory Dan Williams
2020-02-13 2:28 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-13 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-02-13 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-02-16 20:00 ` [PATCH v5 " Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] ACPI: NUMA: Up-level "map to online node" functionality Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:00 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mm/numa: Skip NUMA_NO_NODE and online nodes in numa_map_to_online_node() Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:00 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] powerpc/papr_scm: Switch to numa_map_to_online_node() Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:01 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-17 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-17 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] x86/NUMA: Provide a range-to-target_node lookup facility Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:01 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-17 8:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-17 8:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-16 20:01 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] libnvdimm/e820: Retrieve and populate correct 'target_node' info Dan Williams
2020-02-16 20:01 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200213093227.GA90266@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.