From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: peng.fan@nxp.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-imx@nxp.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm, scmi: add smc/hvc transports
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:54:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213105413.GA23374@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581566330-1029-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:58:49AM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports. Since there is no
> standardized id, we need to use vendor specific id. So
> add into devicetree binding doc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> index f493d69e6194..dacc62dc248b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node.
> protocol identifier for a given sub-node.
> - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size
> associated with it.
> +- smc-id : SMC id required when using smc or hvc transports
IIUC, "arm,smc-id" is preferred more.
Why did you drop "arm,scmi-smc" ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: peng.fan@nxp.com
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
andre.przywara@arm.com, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:54:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200213105413.GA23374@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581566330-1029-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:58:49AM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports. Since there is no
> standardized id, we need to use vendor specific id. So
> add into devicetree binding doc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> index f493d69e6194..dacc62dc248b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node.
> protocol identifier for a given sub-node.
> - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size
> associated with it.
> +- smc-id : SMC id required when using smc or hvc transports
IIUC, "arm,smc-id" is preferred more.
Why did you drop "arm,scmi-smc" ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 3:58 [PATCH V2 0/2] firmware: arm_scmi: add smc/hvc transports support peng.fan
2020-02-13 3:58 ` peng.fan
2020-02-13 3:58 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports peng.fan
2020-02-13 3:58 ` peng.fan
2020-02-13 10:54 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-02-13 10:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-14 0:59 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm, scmi: " Peng Fan
2020-02-14 0:59 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: " Peng Fan
2020-02-13 3:58 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: " peng.fan
2020-02-13 3:58 ` peng.fan
2020-02-13 11:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-13 11:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-02-14 1:04 ` Peng Fan
2020-02-14 1:04 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200213105413.GA23374@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.