Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add Cadence XSPI driver

[Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:23:56AM +0100, Konrad Kociolek wrote:
> The 02/10/2020 19:16, Mark Brown wrote:

> > >  # Add new SPI master controllers in alphabetical order above this line

> > Please keep Kconfig and Makefile alphabetically sorted as the comment in
> > the context from the diff says.  :/

> What I see is Kconfig is first and Makefile is second file in diff,
> according to:
>  drivers/spi/Kconfig            |  11 +
>  drivers/spi/Makefile           |   1 +
> Is that wrong?

Please keep the *contents* of the files Kconfig and Makefile
alphabetically sorted as the comment in the context from the diff says.

> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > > +static const struct of_device_id cdns_xspi_of_match[] = {
> > > +	{
> > > +		.compatible = "cdns,xspi-nor-fpga",
> > > +	},

> > Why -fpga?

> This is because this driver was tested only on FPGA board.
> This driver was not tested for ASIC version as PHY
> initialization algorithm is differ.

So there will need to be a separate compatible for any silicon
integrations?  Will that always be the same for all silicon integrations
or should we have properties for the PHY type?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]