All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com
Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] net: core: devlink.c: Use built-in RCU list checking
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:52:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224105209.GB16270@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224093013.25700-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>

Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:30:13AM CET, madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com wrote:
>From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
>
>list_for_each_entry_rcu() has built-in RCU and lock checking.
>
>Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu() to silence
>false lockdep warning when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST is enabled.
>
>The devlink->lock is held when devlink_dpipe_table_find()
>is called in non RCU read side section. Therefore, pass struct devlink
>to devlink_dpipe_table_find() for lockdep checking.
>
>Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
>---
> net/core/devlink.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>index e82750bdc496..dadf5fa79bb1 100644
>--- a/net/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>@@ -2103,11 +2103,11 @@ static int devlink_dpipe_entry_put(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 
> static struct devlink_dpipe_table *
> devlink_dpipe_table_find(struct list_head *dpipe_tables,
>-			 const char *table_name)
>+			 const char *table_name, struct devlink *devlink)
> {
> 	struct devlink_dpipe_table *table;
>-
>-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, dpipe_tables, list) {
>+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, dpipe_tables, list,
>+				lockdep_is_held(&devlink->lock)) {
> 		if (!strcmp(table->name, table_name))
> 			return table;
> 	}
>@@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_dpipe_entries_get(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 
> 	table_name = nla_data(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_DPIPE_TABLE_NAME]);
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
>@@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@ static int devlink_dpipe_table_counters_set(struct devlink *devlink,
> 	struct devlink_dpipe_table *table;
> 
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
>@@ -6814,7 +6814,7 @@ bool devlink_dpipe_table_counter_enabled(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	rcu_read_lock();
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	enabled = false;
> 	if (table)
> 		enabled = table->counters_enabled;
>@@ -6845,7 +6845,7 @@ int devlink_dpipe_table_register(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> 
>-	if (devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, table_name)) {
>+	if (devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, table_name, devlink)) {

Run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch. You are breaking 80-cols limit
here.

Otherwise, the patch looks fine.

> 		err = -EEXIST;
> 		goto unlock;
> 	}
>@@ -6881,7 +6881,7 @@ void devlink_dpipe_table_unregister(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table)
> 		goto unlock;
> 	list_del_rcu(&table->list);
>@@ -7038,7 +7038,7 @@ int devlink_dpipe_table_resource_set(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table) {
> 		err = -EINVAL;
> 		goto out;
>-- 
>2.17.1
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com
Cc: jiri@mellanox.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	frextrite@gmail.com, paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: devlink.c: Use built-in RCU list checking
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:52:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224105209.GB16270@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224093013.25700-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>

Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:30:13AM CET, madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com wrote:
>From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
>
>list_for_each_entry_rcu() has built-in RCU and lock checking.
>
>Pass cond argument to list_for_each_entry_rcu() to silence
>false lockdep warning when CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST is enabled.
>
>The devlink->lock is held when devlink_dpipe_table_find()
>is called in non RCU read side section. Therefore, pass struct devlink
>to devlink_dpipe_table_find() for lockdep checking.
>
>Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
>---
> net/core/devlink.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>index e82750bdc496..dadf5fa79bb1 100644
>--- a/net/core/devlink.c
>+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>@@ -2103,11 +2103,11 @@ static int devlink_dpipe_entry_put(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 
> static struct devlink_dpipe_table *
> devlink_dpipe_table_find(struct list_head *dpipe_tables,
>-			 const char *table_name)
>+			 const char *table_name, struct devlink *devlink)
> {
> 	struct devlink_dpipe_table *table;
>-
>-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, dpipe_tables, list) {
>+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(table, dpipe_tables, list,
>+				lockdep_is_held(&devlink->lock)) {
> 		if (!strcmp(table->name, table_name))
> 			return table;
> 	}
>@@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_dpipe_entries_get(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 
> 	table_name = nla_data(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_DPIPE_TABLE_NAME]);
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
>@@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@ static int devlink_dpipe_table_counters_set(struct devlink *devlink,
> 	struct devlink_dpipe_table *table;
> 
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
>@@ -6814,7 +6814,7 @@ bool devlink_dpipe_table_counter_enabled(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	rcu_read_lock();
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	enabled = false;
> 	if (table)
> 		enabled = table->counters_enabled;
>@@ -6845,7 +6845,7 @@ int devlink_dpipe_table_register(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> 
>-	if (devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, table_name)) {
>+	if (devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list, table_name, devlink)) {

Run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch. You are breaking 80-cols limit
here.

Otherwise, the patch looks fine.

> 		err = -EEXIST;
> 		goto unlock;
> 	}
>@@ -6881,7 +6881,7 @@ void devlink_dpipe_table_unregister(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table)
> 		goto unlock;
> 	list_del_rcu(&table->list);
>@@ -7038,7 +7038,7 @@ int devlink_dpipe_table_resource_set(struct devlink *devlink,
> 
> 	mutex_lock(&devlink->lock);
> 	table = devlink_dpipe_table_find(&devlink->dpipe_table_list,
>-					 table_name);
>+					 table_name, devlink);
> 	if (!table) {
> 		err = -EINVAL;
> 		goto out;
>-- 
>2.17.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-24 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-24  9:30 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] net: core: devlink.c: Use built-in RCU list checking madhuparnabhowmik10
2020-02-24  9:30 ` madhuparnabhowmik10
2020-02-24 10:52 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2020-02-24 10:52   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-02-25 12:09   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Madhuparna Bhowmik
2020-02-25 12:09     ` Madhuparna Bhowmik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-25 12:27 [Linux-kernel-mentees] " madhuparnabhowmik10
2020-02-25 13:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-02-27  0:59 ` David Miller
2020-02-21 16:51 madhuparnabhowmik10
2020-02-21 17:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-02-21 17:35   ` Madhuparna Bhowmik
2020-02-21 17:54     ` Jiri Pirko
2020-02-21 18:00       ` Madhuparna Bhowmik
2020-02-23 11:03   ` Madhuparna Bhowmik
2020-02-23 18:19     ` Jiri Pirko
2020-02-24  0:28 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200224105209.GB16270@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.