All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Walter Harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
	<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: remove redundant zero'ing of counter variable k
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:27:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224112735.GC3286@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f875f84e6014d2bb5b78f71dc2831a2@bfs.de>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:07:55AM +0000, Walter Harms wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> index 3b8848182221..bdb6ff8aab7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> @@ -244,10 +244,8 @@ u16        Address)
>                 while (!(Bytetemp & 0x80)) {
>                         Bytetemp = rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL+3);
>                         k++;
> -                       if (k = 1000) {
> -                               k = 0;
> +                       if (k = 1000)
>                                 break;
> -                       }
> 
> IMHO this is confusing to read, i suggest:
> 
>  for(k=0;k<1000;k++) {
>       Bytetemp = rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL+3);
>       if ( Bytetemp & 0x80 )
>                break;
>       }
> 

The problem with the original code is that the variable is named "k"
instead of "retry".  It should be:

	do {
		Bytetemp = rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL+3);
	} while (!(Bytetemp & 0x80)) && ++retry < 1000);


>  NTL is am wondering what will happen if k=1000
>  and Bytetemp is still invalid. Will rtw_read8() fail or
>  simply return invalid data ?

Yeah.  That was my thought reviewing this patch as well.

It should probably return 0xff on failure.

	if (retry >= 1000)
		return 0xff;

regards,
dan carpenter

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Walter Harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
	<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: remove redundant zero'ing of counter variable k
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:27:35 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224112735.GC3286@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f875f84e6014d2bb5b78f71dc2831a2@bfs.de>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:07:55AM +0000, Walter Harms wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> index 3b8848182221..bdb6ff8aab7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> @@ -244,10 +244,8 @@ u16        Address)
>                 while (!(Bytetemp & 0x80)) {
>                         Bytetemp = rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL+3);
>                         k++;
> -                       if (k == 1000) {
> -                               k = 0;
> +                       if (k == 1000)
>                                 break;
> -                       }
> 
> IMHO this is confusing to read, i suggest:
> 
>  for(k=0;k<1000;k++) {
>       Bytetemp = rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL+3);
>       if ( Bytetemp & 0x80 )
>                break;
>       }
> 

The problem with the original code is that the variable is named "k"
instead of "retry".  It should be:

	do {
		Bytetemp = rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL+3);
	} while (!(Bytetemp & 0x80)) && ++retry < 1000);


>  NTL is am wondering what will happen if k==1000
>  and Bytetemp is still invalid. Will rtw_read8() fail or
>  simply return invalid data ?

Yeah.  That was my thought reviewing this patch as well.

It should probably return 0xff on failure.

	if (retry >= 1000)
		return 0xff;

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-24 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-23 15:28 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: remove redundant zero'ing of counter variable k Colin King
2020-02-23 15:28 ` Colin King
2020-02-24 11:07 ` AW: " Walter Harms
2020-02-24 11:27   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-02-24 11:27     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-02-24 11:36     ` AW: " Walter Harms
2020-02-24 11:36       ` Walter Harms

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200224112735.GC3286@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wharms@bfs.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.