From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
"H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:49:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202002252147.7BFF9EE@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212192906.53366-2-broonie@kernel.org>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:28:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
>
> Pull the basic ELF definitions relating to the
> NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note from Yu-Cheng Yu's earlier x86 shstk
> series.
Both BTI and SHSTK depend on this. If BTI doesn't land soon, can this
and patch 2 land separately? I don't like seeing the older version in
the SHSTK series -- I worry there will be confusion and the BTI version
(which is more up to date) will get missed.
What's left to land BTI support?
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
"H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Dave Martin" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:49:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202002252147.7BFF9EE@keescook> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200226054935.gBDBPiaRhUKBQO3bW6Ek9tVa1gYYsLYmHtt-OJtskik@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212192906.53366-2-broonie@kernel.org>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:28:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
>
> Pull the basic ELF definitions relating to the
> NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note from Yu-Cheng Yu's earlier x86 shstk
> series.
Both BTI and SHSTK depend on this. If BTI doesn't land soon, can this
and patch 2 land separately? I don't like seeing the older version in
the SHSTK series -- I worry there will be confusion and the BTI version
(which is more up to date) will get missed.
What's left to land BTI support?
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
"Szabolcs Nagy" <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
"Dave Martin" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
"H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:49:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202002252147.7BFF9EE@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212192906.53366-2-broonie@kernel.org>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:28:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
>
> Pull the basic ELF definitions relating to the
> NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note from Yu-Cheng Yu's earlier x86 shstk
> series.
Both BTI and SHSTK depend on this. If BTI doesn't land soon, can this
and patch 2 land separately? I don't like seeing the older version in
the SHSTK series -- I worry there will be confusion and the BTI version
(which is more up to date) will get missed.
What's left to land BTI support?
--
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-26 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 19:28 [PATCH v6 00/11] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-26 5:49 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-02-26 5:49 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 5:49 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 11:20 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-26 11:20 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-26 11:20 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:28 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-25 13:28 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-02-25 13:28 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-02-25 13:28 ` Amit Kachhap
2020-02-25 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-25 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-25 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-26 5:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 5:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-26 5:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] arm64: BTI: Decode BTYPE bits when printing PSTATE Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] arm64: unify native/compat instruction skipping Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] KVM: " Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-15 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-15 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-15 11:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-12 19:29 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] arm64: mm: Display guarded pages in ptdump Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202002252147.7BFF9EE@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.elliott@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.