[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] v2: more sampling fun 0

[mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 09:47:10PM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> speck for mark gross <speck@linutronix.de> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:55:30AM -0600, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:45:10PM -0800, speck for mark gross wrote:
> >> > From: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
> >> > Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] more sampling fun
> >> 
> >> It looks like the actual patches didn't come through?
> >
> > Heavy sigh....
> >
> > I have nothing but badd luck with this.  I updated my .gitconfig on the new
> > workstation to use mgross@linux.intel.com and I git commit --ammend ed the
> > commit I thought was blocked because it had an author of mark.gross@intel.com
> > instead of the other one.
> 
> I put an alias in, so both addresses work on the list.
> 
> > I assume they are getting held up by something on the list server end but, I
> > have no idea what I'm doing to piss it off. :(
> >
> > If anyone could help clue me in I'll try to correct whatever I'm doing wrong.
> > The other two patches where sent using the same process:
> >
> > *  git format-patch -o mail -n --to speck@linutronix.de --thread --cover-letter v5.6-rc3
> > *  speckify-gitmail -s "more sampling fun" mail/ spec/
> > *  for b in `ls`; do sendmail -t -i -f smtp.intel.com  <$b; done
> 
> Which looks about correct, but then the receiving end says:
> 
> 2020-02-24 22:57:31 1j6LjH-00076x-B2 <= smtp.intel.com@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com H=mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93] P=esmtps X=TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256 S=3729 id=cover.1582580710.git.mgross@linux.intel.com
> 2020-02-24 22:57:32 1j6LjH-00076x-B2 => crypto-ml <speck@linutronix.de> R=local_user T=mail_spool
> 2020-02-24 22:57:32 1j6LjH-00076x-B2 Completed
> 
> That's the cover letter. And then the other two seem to be broken:
> 
> 2020-02-24 22:57:32 H=mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100] sender verify fail for <smtp.intel.com@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com>: Unrouteable address
> 2020-02-24 22:57:32 H=mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100] F=<smtp.intel.com@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> rejected RCPT <speck@linutronix.de>: Sender verify failed
> 
> 2020-02-24 22:57:32 H=mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31] sender verify fail for <smtp.intel.com@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com>: Unrouteable address
> 2020-02-24 22:57:32 H=mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31] F=<smtp.intel.com@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> rejected RCPT <speck@linutronix.de>: Sender verify failed
> 
> Now, looking at your sendmail command line:
> 
>      -t -i -f smtp.intel.com
> 
> -f is the envelope sender address. smtp.intel.com is definitely not a
> valid envelope-from address, it's a hostname and it looks like sendmail
> magically makes that into:

doh, thats likely my problem!  I changed it to mgross@linux.intel.com and am
retrying.


> 
>   envelope-from <smtp.intel.com@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com>
> 
> and that mtg-dev.jf.intel.com is probably your host name:
> 
>     mtg-dev . Jones Farm . intel.com 

All true.

> 
> which is bonkers to begin with because I'm pretty sure that nothing can
> send mail to that address.
> 
> Now in the cover letter the From: field is correct:
> 
>     From: mark gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
> 
> but I'm pretty sure, that your other two mails are malformatted and
> sendmail throws your bonkers -f "address" at it which causes the sender
> verify to fail.
> 
> And of course because your envelope-from is broken, the bounce (reject)
> info does not make it to you.
> 
> May I recommend to check the mails in mail/ and spec/ before sending
> them out. You can also check them for a valid From: address after the
> fact of course :)
> 
> BOFH excuse #208:
> 
> Your mail is being routed through Germany ... and they're censoring us.

Thanks!

--mark