From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Define our own swab32() to avoid a uapi static inline
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:52:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225235223.12839-5-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225235223.12839-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
KVM uses swab32() when mediating GIC MMIO accesses if the GICV is badly
aligned, and the host and guest differ in endianness.
arm64 doesn't provide a __arch_swab32(), so __fswab32() is always backed
by the macro implementation that the compiler reduces to a single
instruction. But the static-inline causes problems for KVM if the compiler
chooses not to inline this function, it may not be located in the
__hyp_text where __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access() needs it.
Create our own __kvm_swab32() macro that calls ___constant_swab32()
directly. This way we know it will always be inlined.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200220165839.256881-3-james.morse@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 7 +++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
index 97f21cc66657..5fde137b5150 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
@@ -47,6 +47,13 @@
#define read_sysreg_el2(r) read_sysreg_elx(r, _EL2, _EL1)
#define write_sysreg_el2(v,r) write_sysreg_elx(v, r, _EL2, _EL1)
+/*
+ * Without an __arch_swab32(), we fall back to ___constant_swab32(), but the
+ * static inline can allow the compiler to out-of-line this. KVM always wants
+ * the macro version as its always inlined.
+ */
+#define __kvm_swab32(x) ___constant_swab32(x)
+
int __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
index 29ee1feba4eb..4f3a087e36d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u32 data = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rd);
if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
/* guest pre-swabbed data, undo this for writel() */
- data = swab32(data);
+ data = __kvm_swab32(data);
}
writel_relaxed(data, addr);
} else {
u32 data = readl_relaxed(addr);
if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
/* guest expects swabbed data */
- data = swab32(data);
+ data = __kvm_swab32(data);
}
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Define our own swab32() to avoid a uapi static inline
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:52:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225235223.12839-5-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225235223.12839-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
KVM uses swab32() when mediating GIC MMIO accesses if the GICV is badly
aligned, and the host and guest differ in endianness.
arm64 doesn't provide a __arch_swab32(), so __fswab32() is always backed
by the macro implementation that the compiler reduces to a single
instruction. But the static-inline causes problems for KVM if the compiler
chooses not to inline this function, it may not be located in the
__hyp_text where __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access() needs it.
Create our own __kvm_swab32() macro that calls ___constant_swab32()
directly. This way we know it will always be inlined.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200220165839.256881-3-james.morse@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 7 +++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
index 97f21cc66657..5fde137b5150 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
@@ -47,6 +47,13 @@
#define read_sysreg_el2(r) read_sysreg_elx(r, _EL2, _EL1)
#define write_sysreg_el2(v,r) write_sysreg_elx(v, r, _EL2, _EL1)
+/*
+ * Without an __arch_swab32(), we fall back to ___constant_swab32(), but the
+ * static inline can allow the compiler to out-of-line this. KVM always wants
+ * the macro version as its always inlined.
+ */
+#define __kvm_swab32(x) ___constant_swab32(x)
+
int __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
index 29ee1feba4eb..4f3a087e36d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u32 data = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rd);
if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
/* guest pre-swabbed data, undo this for writel() */
- data = swab32(data);
+ data = __kvm_swab32(data);
}
writel_relaxed(data, addr);
} else {
u32 data = readl_relaxed(addr);
if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
/* guest expects swabbed data */
- data = swab32(data);
+ data = __kvm_swab32(data);
}
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Define our own swab32() to avoid a uapi static inline
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:52:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225235223.12839-5-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225235223.12839-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
KVM uses swab32() when mediating GIC MMIO accesses if the GICV is badly
aligned, and the host and guest differ in endianness.
arm64 doesn't provide a __arch_swab32(), so __fswab32() is always backed
by the macro implementation that the compiler reduces to a single
instruction. But the static-inline causes problems for KVM if the compiler
chooses not to inline this function, it may not be located in the
__hyp_text where __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access() needs it.
Create our own __kvm_swab32() macro that calls ___constant_swab32()
directly. This way we know it will always be inlined.
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200220165839.256881-3-james.morse@arm.com
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 7 +++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
index 97f21cc66657..5fde137b5150 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
@@ -47,6 +47,13 @@
#define read_sysreg_el2(r) read_sysreg_elx(r, _EL2, _EL1)
#define write_sysreg_el2(v,r) write_sysreg_elx(v, r, _EL2, _EL1)
+/*
+ * Without an __arch_swab32(), we fall back to ___constant_swab32(), but the
+ * static inline can allow the compiler to out-of-line this. KVM always wants
+ * the macro version as its always inlined.
+ */
+#define __kvm_swab32(x) ___constant_swab32(x)
+
int __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
index 29ee1feba4eb..4f3a087e36d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
u32 data = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rd);
if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
/* guest pre-swabbed data, undo this for writel() */
- data = swab32(data);
+ data = __kvm_swab32(data);
}
writel_relaxed(data, addr);
} else {
u32 data = readl_relaxed(addr);
if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
/* guest expects swabbed data */
- data = swab32(data);
+ data = __kvm_swab32(data);
}
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
}
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 23:52 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm fixes for 5.6 Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm/arm64: Fix up includes for trace.h Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] kvm: arm/arm64: Fold VHE entry/exit work into kvm_vcpu_run_vhe() Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Ask the compiler to __always_inline functions used at HYP Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-02-25 23:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Define our own swab32() to avoid a uapi static inline Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Ask the compiler to __always_inline functions used by KVM at HYP Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-25 23:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-28 10:47 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/arm fixes for 5.6 Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-28 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-28 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200225235223.12839-5-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=jcline@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.