All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Paul E . Mckenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] ipmi: Fix RCU list lockdep debugging warnings
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:47:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228081731.18149-1-frextrite@gmail.com> (raw)

It is completely safe to traverse ipmi_interfaces and
intf->users under SRCU read lock using list_for_each_entry_rcu().
Tell lockdep about it as well else it will show false-positive
warnings as the one below.

Fixes the following false-positive warning and others that may follow.

[   29.772408] =============================
[   29.776863] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[   29.780915] 5.6.0-rc3-00001-g907305ae6618-dirty #1755 Not tainted
[   29.787046] -----------------------------
[   29.791100] drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c:744 RCU-list traversed in
non-reader section!!

Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index cad9563f8f48..d202022c69de 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -741,7 +741,8 @@ int ipmi_smi_watcher_register(struct ipmi_smi_watcher *watcher)
 	list_add(&watcher->link, &smi_watchers);
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		int intf_num = READ_ONCE(intf->intf_num);
 
 		if (intf_num == -1)
@@ -1188,7 +1189,8 @@ int ipmi_create_user(unsigned int          if_num,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		if (intf->intf_num == if_num)
 			goto found;
 	}
@@ -1241,7 +1243,8 @@ int ipmi_get_smi_info(int if_num, struct ipmi_smi_info *data)
 	struct ipmi_smi *intf;
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		if (intf->intf_num == if_num)
 			goto found;
 	}
@@ -4098,7 +4101,8 @@ static int handle_read_event_rsp(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
 	 * getting events.
 	 */
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&intf->users_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&intf->users_srcu)) {
 		if (!user->gets_events)
 			continue;
 
@@ -4453,7 +4457,8 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
 		int index;
 
 		index = srcu_read_lock(&intf->users_srcu);
-		list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link) {
+		list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link,
+					srcu_read_lock_held(&intf->users_srcu)) {
 			if (user->handler->ipmi_watchdog_pretimeout)
 				user->handler->ipmi_watchdog_pretimeout(
 					user->handler_data);
@@ -4746,7 +4751,8 @@ static void ipmi_timeout(struct timer_list *unused)
 		return;
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		if (atomic_read(&intf->event_waiters)) {
 			intf->ticks_to_req_ev--;
 			if (intf->ticks_to_req_ev == 0) {
-- 
2.25.0

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . Mckenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ipmi: Fix RCU list lockdep debugging warnings
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:47:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228081731.18149-1-frextrite@gmail.com> (raw)

It is completely safe to traverse ipmi_interfaces and
intf->users under SRCU read lock using list_for_each_entry_rcu().
Tell lockdep about it as well else it will show false-positive
warnings as the one below.

Fixes the following false-positive warning and others that may follow.

[   29.772408] =============================
[   29.776863] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[   29.780915] 5.6.0-rc3-00001-g907305ae6618-dirty #1755 Not tainted
[   29.787046] -----------------------------
[   29.791100] drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c:744 RCU-list traversed in
non-reader section!!

Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index cad9563f8f48..d202022c69de 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -741,7 +741,8 @@ int ipmi_smi_watcher_register(struct ipmi_smi_watcher *watcher)
 	list_add(&watcher->link, &smi_watchers);
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		int intf_num = READ_ONCE(intf->intf_num);
 
 		if (intf_num == -1)
@@ -1188,7 +1189,8 @@ int ipmi_create_user(unsigned int          if_num,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		if (intf->intf_num == if_num)
 			goto found;
 	}
@@ -1241,7 +1243,8 @@ int ipmi_get_smi_info(int if_num, struct ipmi_smi_info *data)
 	struct ipmi_smi *intf;
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		if (intf->intf_num == if_num)
 			goto found;
 	}
@@ -4098,7 +4101,8 @@ static int handle_read_event_rsp(struct ipmi_smi *intf,
 	 * getting events.
 	 */
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&intf->users_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&intf->users_srcu)) {
 		if (!user->gets_events)
 			continue;
 
@@ -4453,7 +4457,8 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(struct ipmi_smi *intf)
 		int index;
 
 		index = srcu_read_lock(&intf->users_srcu);
-		list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link) {
+		list_for_each_entry_rcu(user, &intf->users, link,
+					srcu_read_lock_held(&intf->users_srcu)) {
 			if (user->handler->ipmi_watchdog_pretimeout)
 				user->handler->ipmi_watchdog_pretimeout(
 					user->handler_data);
@@ -4746,7 +4751,8 @@ static void ipmi_timeout(struct timer_list *unused)
 		return;
 
 	index = srcu_read_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu);
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link,
+				srcu_read_lock_held(&ipmi_interfaces_srcu)) {
 		if (atomic_read(&intf->event_waiters)) {
 			intf->ticks_to_req_ev--;
 			if (intf->ticks_to_req_ev == 0) {
-- 
2.25.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28  8:17 Amol Grover [this message]
2020-02-28  8:17 ` [PATCH] ipmi: Fix RCU list lockdep debugging warnings Amol Grover
2020-02-28 11:49 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " John Garry
2020-02-28 11:49   ` John Garry
2020-02-28 17:44 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Corey Minyard
2020-02-28 17:44   ` Corey Minyard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200228081731.18149-1-frextrite@gmail.com \
    --to=frextrite@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com \
    --cc=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.