* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer
@ 2020-03-05 23:59 Andi Shyti
2020-03-06 0:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-03-05 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Intel GFX
When registering debugfs files the intel gt debugfs library
forces a 'struct *gt' private data on the caller.
There might be different needs, therefore make it generic by
adding one more argument to the "debugfs_register_files()"
function which gets the generic void private data as argument.
Still keep it simple by defining a wrapper where struct *gt is
the chosen private data to be stored.
I take the chance to rename the functions by using "intel_gt_" as
prefix instead of "debugfs_".
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c | 9 ++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h | 10 ++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c
index 6a5e9ab20b94..3434df10d58c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c
@@ -32,5 +32,5 @@ void debugfs_engines_register(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
{ "engines", &engines_fops },
};
- debugfs_gt_register_files(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
+ intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c
index 75255aaacaed..9112a8585caf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c
@@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ void debugfs_gt_register(struct intel_gt *gt)
debugfs_gt_pm_register(gt, root);
}
-void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt,
- struct dentry *root,
- const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
- unsigned long count)
+void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root,
+ const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
+ unsigned long count, void *data)
{
while (count--) {
if (!files->eval || files->eval(gt))
debugfs_create_file(files->name,
- 0444, root, gt,
+ 0444, root, data,
files->fops);
files++;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h
index 4ea0f06cda8f..1c01d70a2a44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h
@@ -31,9 +31,11 @@ struct debugfs_gt_file {
bool (*eval)(const struct intel_gt *gt);
};
-void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt,
- struct dentry *root,
- const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
- unsigned long count);
+void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root,
+ const struct debugfs_gt_file *files,
+ unsigned long count, void *data);
+
+#define intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(_g, _r, _f, _c) \
+ __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(_g, _r, _f, _c, _g)
#endif /* DEBUGFS_GT_H */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
index 059c9e5c002e..a8d2391a207a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c
@@ -597,5 +597,5 @@ void debugfs_gt_pm_register(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root)
{ "rps_boost", &rps_boost_fops, rps_eval },
};
- debugfs_gt_register_files(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
+ intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files));
}
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-05 23:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer Andi Shyti @ 2020-03-06 0:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 2020-03-06 1:15 ` Andi Shyti 2020-03-06 6:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio @ 2020-03-06 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Shyti, Intel GFX On 3/5/20 3:59 PM, Andi Shyti wrote: > When registering debugfs files the intel gt debugfs library > forces a 'struct *gt' private data on the caller. > > There might be different needs, therefore make it generic by > adding one more argument to the "debugfs_register_files()" > function which gets the generic void private data as argument. > > Still keep it simple by defining a wrapper where struct *gt is > the chosen private data to be stored. > > I take the chance to rename the functions by using "intel_gt_" as > prefix instead of "debugfs_". > > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c | 9 ++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h | 10 ++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c > index 6a5e9ab20b94..3434df10d58c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_engines.c > @@ -32,5 +32,5 @@ void debugfs_engines_register(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root) > { "engines", &engines_fops }, > }; > > - debugfs_gt_register_files(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files)); > + intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files)); > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > index 75255aaacaed..9112a8585caf 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > @@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ void debugfs_gt_register(struct intel_gt *gt) > debugfs_gt_pm_register(gt, root); > } > > -void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, > - struct dentry *root, > - const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > - unsigned long count) > +void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root, > + const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > + unsigned long count, void *data) > { > while (count--) { > if (!files->eval || files->eval(gt)) IMO the files->eval() function should also use the provided data instead of intel_gt. This will also allow us to drop the intel_gt parameter in this function, which in turn means we can use this function directly from all the levels. Daniele > debugfs_create_file(files->name, > - 0444, root, gt, > + 0444, root, data, > files->fops); > > files++; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h > index 4ea0f06cda8f..1c01d70a2a44 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h > @@ -31,9 +31,11 @@ struct debugfs_gt_file { > bool (*eval)(const struct intel_gt *gt); > }; > > -void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, > - struct dentry *root, > - const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > - unsigned long count); > +void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root, > + const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > + unsigned long count, void *data); > + > +#define intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(_g, _r, _f, _c) \ > + __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(_g, _r, _f, _c, _g) > > #endif /* DEBUGFS_GT_H */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c > index 059c9e5c002e..a8d2391a207a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt_pm.c > @@ -597,5 +597,5 @@ void debugfs_gt_pm_register(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root) > { "rps_boost", &rps_boost_fops, rps_eval }, > }; > > - debugfs_gt_register_files(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files)); > + intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(gt, root, files, ARRAY_SIZE(files)); > } > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-06 0:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio @ 2020-03-06 1:15 ` Andi Shyti 2020-03-06 1:27 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-03-06 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio; +Cc: Intel GFX Hi Daniele, > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > > index 75255aaacaed..9112a8585caf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > > @@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ void debugfs_gt_register(struct intel_gt *gt) > > debugfs_gt_pm_register(gt, root); > > } > > -void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, > > - struct dentry *root, > > - const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > > - unsigned long count) > > +void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root, > > + const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > > + unsigned long count, void *data) > > { > > while (count--) { > > if (!files->eval || files->eval(gt)) > > IMO the files->eval() function should also use the provided data instead of > intel_gt. This will also allow us to drop the intel_gt parameter in this > function, which in turn means we can use this function directly from all the > levels. do you mean something like this: - bool (*eval)(const struct intel_gt *gt); + bool (*eval)(void *data); ? I am missing the use case, though, what is it that cannot be reached by the gt so that it needs to be more generic? Do you want to use it at i915 level? Thanks for the review, Andi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-06 1:15 ` Andi Shyti @ 2020-03-06 1:27 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 2020-03-06 10:47 ` Andi Shyti 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio @ 2020-03-06 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Shyti; +Cc: Intel GFX On 3/5/20 5:15 PM, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Daniele, > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c >>> index 75255aaacaed..9112a8585caf 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c >>> @@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ void debugfs_gt_register(struct intel_gt *gt) >>> debugfs_gt_pm_register(gt, root); >>> } >>> -void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, >>> - struct dentry *root, >>> - const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, >>> - unsigned long count) >>> +void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root, >>> + const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, >>> + unsigned long count, void *data) >>> { >>> while (count--) { >>> if (!files->eval || files->eval(gt)) >> >> IMO the files->eval() function should also use the provided data instead of >> intel_gt. This will also allow us to drop the intel_gt parameter in this >> function, which in turn means we can use this function directly from all the >> levels. > > do you mean something like this: > > - bool (*eval)(const struct intel_gt *gt); > + bool (*eval)(void *data); > > ? yes > > I am missing the use case, though, what is it that cannot be > reached by the gt so that it needs to be more generic? It's not a problem of reaching it from gt but the other way around, I don't want the caller to have to retrieve a gt variable it don't needs just to pass it to this function and then go back to the actual required data from gt inside of the eval function. Anything you need for your evaluation should be reachable from the struct used as data for the debugfs. To make a concrete example, I want to avoid an unneeded guc_to_gt inside intel_guc_debugfs_register that would also require a matched guc = >->uc.guc inside the eval function, passing guc (i.e. the data) straight in the eval is cleaner IMO. Daniele > > Do you want to use it at i915 level? > > Thanks for the review, > Andi > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-06 1:27 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio @ 2020-03-06 10:47 ` Andi Shyti 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Andi Shyti @ 2020-03-06 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio; +Cc: Intel GFX Hi Daniele, > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > > > > index 75255aaacaed..9112a8585caf 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.c > > > > @@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ void debugfs_gt_register(struct intel_gt *gt) > > > > debugfs_gt_pm_register(gt, root); > > > > } > > > > -void debugfs_gt_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, > > > > - struct dentry *root, > > > > - const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > > > > - unsigned long count) > > > > +void __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(struct intel_gt *gt, struct dentry *root, > > > > + const struct debugfs_gt_file *files, > > > > + unsigned long count, void *data) > > > > { > > > > while (count--) { > > > > if (!files->eval || files->eval(gt)) > > > > > > IMO the files->eval() function should also use the provided data instead of > > > intel_gt. This will also allow us to drop the intel_gt parameter in this > > > function, which in turn means we can use this function directly from all the > > > levels. > > > > do you mean something like this: > > > > - bool (*eval)(const struct intel_gt *gt); > > + bool (*eval)(void *data); > > > > ? > > yes > > > > > I am missing the use case, though, what is it that cannot be > > reached by the gt so that it needs to be more generic? > > It's not a problem of reaching it from gt but the other way around, I don't > want the caller to have to retrieve a gt variable it don't needs just to > pass it to this function and then go back to the actual required data from > gt inside of the eval function. Anything you need for your evaluation should > be reachable from the struct used as data for the debugfs. > To make a concrete example, I want to avoid an unneeded guc_to_gt inside > intel_guc_debugfs_register that would also require a matched guc = > >->uc.guc inside the eval function, passing guc (i.e. the data) straight > in the eval is cleaner IMO. Thanks for the feedback, makes sense. Andi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-05 23:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer Andi Shyti 2020-03-06 0:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio @ 2020-03-06 6:44 ` Patchwork 2020-03-06 6:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2020-03-06 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Shyti; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74360/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip b5c27a068592 drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer -:72: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse '_g' - possible side-effects? #72: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/debugfs_gt.h:38: +#define intel_gt_debugfs_register_file(_g, _r, _f, _c) \ + __intel_gt_debugfs_register_files(_g, _r, _f, _c, _g) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 46 lines checked _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-05 23:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer Andi Shyti 2020-03-06 0:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 2020-03-06 6:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork @ 2020-03-06 6:58 ` Patchwork 2020-03-06 7:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2020-03-07 0:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2020-03-06 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Shyti; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74360/ State : warning == Summary == $ make htmldocs 2>&1 > /dev/null | grep i915 ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h:285: warning: Function parameter or member 'get_freq' not described in 'intel_shared_dpll_funcs' _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-05 23:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer Andi Shyti ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2020-03-06 6:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork @ 2020-03-06 7:08 ` Patchwork 2020-03-07 0:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2020-03-06 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Shyti; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74360/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8074 -> Patchwork_16852 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/index.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16852 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-999: - fi-tgl-y: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([CI#94] / [i915#402]) +1 similar issue [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/fi-tgl-y/igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-999.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/fi-tgl-y/igt@kms_addfb_basic@bad-pitch-999.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@prime_vgem@basic-gtt: - fi-tgl-y: [DMESG-WARN][3] ([CI#94] / [i915#402]) -> [PASS][4] +1 similar issue [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_vgem@basic-gtt.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/fi-tgl-y/igt@prime_vgem@basic-gtt.html [CI#94]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/i915-infra/issues/94 [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402 Participating hosts (50 -> 43) ------------------------------ Additional (1): fi-kbl-7560u Missing (8): fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-snb-2520m fi-ctg-p8600 fi-gdg-551 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus Build changes ------------- * CI: CI-20190529 -> None * Linux: CI_DRM_8074 -> Patchwork_16852 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_8074: 0dd63259839ca847514d9999749219635f311015 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5495: 22df72de8affcec22d9f354bb6148d77f60cc580 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_16852: b5c27a068592cbdb2b4abf4e73ee5e305e3e227d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux == Linux commits == b5c27a068592 drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/index.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer 2020-03-05 23:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer Andi Shyti ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2020-03-06 7:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork @ 2020-03-07 0:36 ` Patchwork 4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2020-03-07 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andi Shyti; +Cc: intel-gfx == Series Details == Series: drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74360/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8074_full -> Patchwork_16852_full ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16852_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3: - shard-kbl: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([i915#180]) +3 similar issues [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-kbl1/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-write-read-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#109276] / [i915#677]) [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-write-read-bsd2.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-write-read-bsd2.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-shared-iova-bsd: - shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#677]) [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-shared-iova-bsd.html [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-shared-iova-bsd.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@promotion-bsd1: - shard-iclb: [PASS][7] -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#109276]) +7 similar issues [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@promotion-bsd1.html [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@promotion-bsd1.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd: - shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#112146]) +3 similar issues [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd.html [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@reorder-wide-bsd.html * igt@i915_pm_rps@min-max-config-loaded: - shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#370]) [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb8/igt@i915_pm_rps@min-max-config-loaded.html [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_rps@min-max-config-loaded.html * igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost: - shard-iclb: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#413]) [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost.html [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb4/igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost.html * igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader: - shard-apl: [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#180]) +3 similar issues [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-apl4/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-apl4/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible: - shard-skl: [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([i915#79]) [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-skl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-skl10/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-move: - shard-skl: [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#49]) [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-skl7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-move.html [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-skl5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-move.html * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min: - shard-skl: [PASS][21] -> [FAIL][22] ([fdo#108145]) [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min.html [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-skl5/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_no_drrs: - shard-iclb: [PASS][23] -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#109441]) [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_no_drrs.html [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_psr@psr2_no_drrs.html * igt@kms_setmode@basic: - shard-apl: [PASS][25] -> [FAIL][26] ([i915#31]) [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-apl1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-apl1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html * igt@perf_pmu@busy-vcs1: - shard-iclb: [PASS][27] -> [SKIP][28] ([fdo#112080]) +9 similar issues [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb1/igt@perf_pmu@busy-vcs1.html [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-vcs1.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][29] ([i915#677]) -> [PASS][30] +1 similar issue [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd.html [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][31] ([fdo#109276] / [i915#677]) -> [PASS][32] [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd2.html [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@implicit-both-bsd2.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-contexts-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][33] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][34] +15 similar issues [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-contexts-bsd2.html [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-contexts-bsd2.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][35] ([fdo#112146]) -> [PASS][36] +2 similar issues [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html * igt@gem_exec_store@cachelines-vcs1: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][37] ([fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][38] +2 similar issues [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_store@cachelines-vcs1.html [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_store@cachelines-vcs1.html * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-priority: - shard-glk: [DMESG-WARN][39] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) -> [PASS][40] [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-priority.html [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-glk7/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-queues-priority.html * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-dpms: - shard-skl: [INCOMPLETE][41] ([i915#198]) -> [PASS][42] [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-skl9/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-dpms.html [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-skl7/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc5-dpms.html * igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost: - shard-tglb: [FAIL][43] ([i915#413]) -> [PASS][44] [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-tglb1/igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost.html [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost.html * igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader: - shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][45] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][46] +1 similar issue [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-kbl2/igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader.html [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-kbl7/igt@i915_suspend@debugfs-reader.html * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-a-64x64-bottom-edge: - shard-snb: [SKIP][47] ([fdo#109271]) -> [PASS][48] +1 similar issue [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-snb6/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-a-64x64-bottom-edge.html [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-snb2/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-a-64x64-bottom-edge.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle: - shard-hsw: [FAIL][49] ([i915#57]) -> [PASS][50] [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-hsw8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle.html [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursor-vs-flip-toggle.html * igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-yf-tiled: - shard-skl: [FAIL][51] ([fdo#108145]) -> [PASS][52] [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-skl10/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-yf-tiled.html [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-skl8/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-yf-tiled.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][53] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][54] [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html #### Warnings #### * igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles: - shard-hsw: [DMESG-WARN][55] ([fdo#111870]) -> [DMESG-WARN][56] ([fdo#110789] / [fdo#111870]) [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8074/shard-hsw8/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles.html [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/shard-hsw4/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles.html [fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145 [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271 [fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276 [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441 [fdo#110789]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 [fdo#111870]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111870 [fdo#112080]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112080 [fdo#112146]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112146 [i915#118]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/118 [i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180 [i915#198]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/198 [i915#31]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/31 [i915#370]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/370 [i915#413]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/413 [i915#49]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/49 [i915#57]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/57 [i915#677]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/677 [i915#79]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/79 [i915#95]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/95 Participating hosts (10 -> 10) ------------------------------ No changes in participating hosts Build changes ------------- * CI: CI-20190529 -> None * Linux: CI_DRM_8074 -> Patchwork_16852 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_8074: 0dd63259839ca847514d9999749219635f311015 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGT_5495: 22df72de8affcec22d9f354bb6148d77f60cc580 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools Patchwork_16852: b5c27a068592cbdb2b4abf4e73ee5e305e3e227d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16852/index.html _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-07 0:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-03-05 23:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: allow setting generic data pointer Andi Shyti 2020-03-06 0:31 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 2020-03-06 1:15 ` Andi Shyti 2020-03-06 1:27 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 2020-03-06 10:47 ` Andi Shyti 2020-03-06 6:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork 2020-03-06 6:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork 2020-03-06 7:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2020-03-07 0:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.