Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mst: Hookup DRM DP MST late_register/early_unregister callbacks

From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Manasi Navare" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
	"José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/mst: Hookup DRM DP MST late_register/early_unregister callbacks
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:06:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200310190604.GP13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310185417.1588984-1-lyude@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:54:16PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> i915 can enable aux device nodes for DP MST by calling
> drm_dp_mst_connector_late_register()/drm_dp_mst_connector_early_unregister(),
> so let's hook that up.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> * Call intel_connector_register/unregister() from
>   intel_dp_mst_connector_late_register/unregister() so we don't lose
>   error injection - Ville Syrjälä
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index d53978ed3c12..9311c10f5b1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -548,12 +548,36 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_get_ddc_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +intel_dp_mst_connector_late_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = drm_dp_mst_connector_late_register(connector,
> +						 intel_connector->port);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return intel_connector_register(connector);

Don't we have to undo the damage if this fails?

> +}
> +
> +static void
> +intel_dp_mst_connector_early_unregister(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
> +
> +	intel_connector_unregister(connector);
> +	drm_dp_mst_connector_early_unregister(connector,
> +					      intel_connector->port);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct drm_connector_funcs intel_dp_mst_connector_funcs = {
>  	.fill_modes = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
>  	.atomic_get_property = intel_digital_connector_atomic_get_property,
>  	.atomic_set_property = intel_digital_connector_atomic_set_property,
> -	.late_register = intel_connector_register,
> -	.early_unregister = intel_connector_unregister,
> +	.late_register = intel_dp_mst_connector_late_register,
> +	.early_unregister = intel_dp_mst_connector_early_unregister,
>  	.destroy = intel_connector_destroy,
>  	.atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_connector_destroy_state,
>  	.atomic_duplicate_state = intel_digital_connector_duplicate_state,
> -- 
> 2.24.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel