From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] treewide: Rename "unencrypted" to "decrypted"
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:42:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319174254.GE13073@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878sjw5k9u.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:25:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> TBH, I don't see how
>
> if (force_dma_decrypted(dev))
> set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)cpu_addr, 1 << page_order);
>
> makes more sense than the above. It's both non-sensical unless there is
9087c37584fb ("dma-direct: Force unencrypted DMA under SME for certain DMA masks")
> a big fat comment explaining what this is about.
ACK to that.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] treewide: Rename "unencrypted" to "decrypted"
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:42:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319174254.GE13073@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878sjw5k9u.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:25:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> TBH, I don't see how
>
> if (force_dma_decrypted(dev))
> set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)cpu_addr, 1 << page_order);
>
> makes more sense than the above. It's both non-sensical unless there is
9087c37584fb ("dma-direct: Force unencrypted DMA under SME for certain DMA masks")
> a big fat comment explaining what this is about.
ACK to that.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] treewide: Rename "unencrypted" to "decrypted"
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:42:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319174254.GE13073@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878sjw5k9u.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:25:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> TBH, I don't see how
>
> if (force_dma_decrypted(dev))
> set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)cpu_addr, 1 << page_order);
>
> makes more sense than the above. It's both non-sensical unless there is
9087c37584fb ("dma-direct: Force unencrypted DMA under SME for certain DMA masks")
> a big fat comment explaining what this is about.
ACK to that.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-19 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-17 11:18 [PATCH] treewide: Rename "unencrypted" to "decrypted" Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 11:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 11:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 11:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 20:35 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-17 20:35 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-17 20:35 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-17 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 21:24 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-17 21:24 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-17 21:24 ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-17 21:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 21:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 21:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-17 21:34 ` Joe Perches
2020-03-17 21:34 ` Joe Perches
2020-03-17 21:34 ` Joe Perches
2020-03-17 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-17 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-17 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-17 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-17 23:16 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-17 23:16 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-17 23:16 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-17 23:16 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-17 23:51 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-17 23:51 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-17 23:51 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-17 23:51 ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-19 10:16 ` [PATCH -v2] " Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-19 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-19 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-19 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 10:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 11:06 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-19 11:06 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-19 11:06 ` Robin Murphy
2020-03-19 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 17:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-19 17:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-19 17:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-19 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-03-19 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-19 23:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-19 23:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-19 23:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-19 21:59 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-19 21:59 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-03-19 21:59 ` Michal Suchánek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200319174254.GE13073@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.