All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:39:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320173945.GC27072@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org>

The 03/16/2020 16:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> This patch series implements support for ARMv8.5-A Branch Target
> Identification (BTI), which is a control flow integrity protection
> feature introduced as part of the ARMv8.5-A extensions.

i was playing with this and it seems the kernel does not add
PROT_BTI to non-static executables (i.e. there is an interpreter).

i thought any elf that the kernel maps would get PROT_BTI from the
kernel. (i want to remove the mprotect in glibc when not necessary)

i tested by linking a hello world exe with -Wl,-z,force-bti (and
verified that the property note is there) and expected it to crash
(with SIGILL) when the dynamic linker jumps to _start in the exe,
but it executed without errors (if i do the mprotect in glibc then
i get SIGILL as expected).

is this deliberate? does the kernel map static exe and dynamic
linked exe differently?

i cant tell looking at the patches where this logic comes from.

> 
> Changes:
> 
> v10:
>  - Fix build for !COMPAT configurations.
> v9:
>  - Move Kconfig addition to final patch in series.
>  - Add patch from Daniel Kiss adding BTI information to smaps, this has
>    a trivial conflict with a .rst conversion in -next.
> v8:
>  - Remove a redundant IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI) check.
> v7:
>  - Rebase onto v5.6-rc3.
>  - Move comment about keeping NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 internal into first
>    patch.
>  - Add an explicit check for system_supports_bti() when parsing BTI ELF
>    property for improved robustness.
> v6:
>  - Rebase onto v5.6-rc1.
>  - Fix typos s/BYTPE/BTYPE/ in commit log for "arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE
>    bits when printing PSTATE".
> v5:
>  - Changed a bunch of -EIO to -ENOEXEC in the ELF parsing code.
>  - Move PSR_BTYPE defines to UAPI.
>  - Use compat_user_mode() rather than open coding.
>  - Fix a typo s/BYTPE/BTYPE/ in syscall.c
> v4:
>  - Dropped patch fixing existing documentation as it has already been merged.
>  - Convert WARN_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() in "ELF: Add ELF program property
>    parsing support".
>  - Added display of guarded pages to ptdump.
>  - Updated for conversion of exception handling from assembler to C.
> 
> Notes:
> 
>  * GCC 9 can compile backwards-compatible BTI-enabled code with
>    -mbranch-protection=bti or -mbranch-protection=standard.
> 
>  * Binutils 2.33 and later support the new ELF note.
> 
>    Creation of a BTI-enabled binary requires _everything_ linked in to
>    be BTI-enabled.  For now ld --force-bti can be used to override this,
>    but some things may break until the required C library support is in
>    place.
> 
>    There is no straightforward way to mark a .s file as BTI-enabled:
>    scraping the output from gcc -S works as a quick hack for now.
> 
>    readelf -n can be used to examing the program properties in an ELF
>    file.
> 
>  * Runtime mmap() and mprotect() can be used to enable BTI on a
>    page-by-page basis using the new PROT_BTI, but the code in the
>    affected pages still needs to be written or compiled to contain the
>    appropriate BTI landing pads.
> 
> Daniel Kiss (1):
>   mm: smaps: Report arm64 guarded pages in smaps
> 
> Dave Martin (11):
>   ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties
>   ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support
>   arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support
>   elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags
>   arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties
>   arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE
>   arm64: unify native/compat instruction skipping
>   arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations
>   arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
>   KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
>   arm64: BTI: Add Kconfig entry for userspace BTI
> 
> Mark Brown (1):
>   arm64: mm: Display guarded pages in ptdump
> 
>  Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst |   2 +
>  Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst            |   5 +
>  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt            |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  25 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h              |   3 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h           |   6 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h                  |  50 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h                  |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h            |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h                |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h          |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h                 |  37 +++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h        |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h              |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h               |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h               |   4 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h           |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/mman.h            |   9 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h          |   9 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c                |  33 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c                   |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c              |  11 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c                   |  36 ++++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c                    |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c                    |  16 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c                   |  18 +++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c                     | 131 ++++++++--------
>  arch/arm64/mm/dump.c                          |   5 +
>  fs/Kconfig.binfmt                             |   6 +
>  fs/binfmt_elf.c                               | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
>  fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c                        |   4 +
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c                            |   3 +
>  include/linux/elf.h                           |  43 ++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h                            |   3 +
>  include/uapi/linux/elf.h                      |  11 ++
>  35 files changed, 560 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> 
> 
> base-commit: f8788d86ab28f61f7b46eb6be375f8a726783636
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:39:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320173945.GC27072@arm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200320173946.LHlGbfewWXNwUv7dlaw8JRWSGgrgFC3xODH359FunHE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org>

The 03/16/2020 16:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> This patch series implements support for ARMv8.5-A Branch Target
> Identification (BTI), which is a control flow integrity protection
> feature introduced as part of the ARMv8.5-A extensions.

i was playing with this and it seems the kernel does not add
PROT_BTI to non-static executables (i.e. there is an interpreter).

i thought any elf that the kernel maps would get PROT_BTI from the
kernel. (i want to remove the mprotect in glibc when not necessary)

i tested by linking a hello world exe with -Wl,-z,force-bti (and
verified that the property note is there) and expected it to crash
(with SIGILL) when the dynamic linker jumps to _start in the exe,
but it executed without errors (if i do the mprotect in glibc then
i get SIGILL as expected).

is this deliberate? does the kernel map static exe and dynamic
linked exe differently?

i cant tell looking at the patches where this logic comes from.

> 
> Changes:
> 
> v10:
>  - Fix build for !COMPAT configurations.
> v9:
>  - Move Kconfig addition to final patch in series.
>  - Add patch from Daniel Kiss adding BTI information to smaps, this has
>    a trivial conflict with a .rst conversion in -next.
> v8:
>  - Remove a redundant IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI) check.
> v7:
>  - Rebase onto v5.6-rc3.
>  - Move comment about keeping NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 internal into first
>    patch.
>  - Add an explicit check for system_supports_bti() when parsing BTI ELF
>    property for improved robustness.
> v6:
>  - Rebase onto v5.6-rc1.
>  - Fix typos s/BYTPE/BTYPE/ in commit log for "arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE
>    bits when printing PSTATE".
> v5:
>  - Changed a bunch of -EIO to -ENOEXEC in the ELF parsing code.
>  - Move PSR_BTYPE defines to UAPI.
>  - Use compat_user_mode() rather than open coding.
>  - Fix a typo s/BYTPE/BTYPE/ in syscall.c
> v4:
>  - Dropped patch fixing existing documentation as it has already been merged.
>  - Convert WARN_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() in "ELF: Add ELF program property
>    parsing support".
>  - Added display of guarded pages to ptdump.
>  - Updated for conversion of exception handling from assembler to C.
> 
> Notes:
> 
>  * GCC 9 can compile backwards-compatible BTI-enabled code with
>    -mbranch-protection=bti or -mbranch-protection=standard.
> 
>  * Binutils 2.33 and later support the new ELF note.
> 
>    Creation of a BTI-enabled binary requires _everything_ linked in to
>    be BTI-enabled.  For now ld --force-bti can be used to override this,
>    but some things may break until the required C library support is in
>    place.
> 
>    There is no straightforward way to mark a .s file as BTI-enabled:
>    scraping the output from gcc -S works as a quick hack for now.
> 
>    readelf -n can be used to examing the program properties in an ELF
>    file.
> 
>  * Runtime mmap() and mprotect() can be used to enable BTI on a
>    page-by-page basis using the new PROT_BTI, but the code in the
>    affected pages still needs to be written or compiled to contain the
>    appropriate BTI landing pads.
> 
> Daniel Kiss (1):
>   mm: smaps: Report arm64 guarded pages in smaps
> 
> Dave Martin (11):
>   ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties
>   ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support
>   arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support
>   elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags
>   arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties
>   arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE
>   arm64: unify native/compat instruction skipping
>   arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations
>   arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
>   KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
>   arm64: BTI: Add Kconfig entry for userspace BTI
> 
> Mark Brown (1):
>   arm64: mm: Display guarded pages in ptdump
> 
>  Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst |   2 +
>  Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst            |   5 +
>  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt            |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  25 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h              |   3 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h           |   6 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h                  |  50 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h                  |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h            |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h                |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h          |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h                 |  37 +++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h        |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h              |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h               |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h               |   4 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h           |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/mman.h            |   9 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h          |   9 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c                |  33 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c                   |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c              |  11 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c                   |  36 ++++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c                    |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c                    |  16 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c                   |  18 +++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c                     | 131 ++++++++--------
>  arch/arm64/mm/dump.c                          |   5 +
>  fs/Kconfig.binfmt                             |   6 +
>  fs/binfmt_elf.c                               | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
>  fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c                        |   4 +
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c                            |   3 +
>  include/linux/elf.h                           |  43 ++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h                            |   3 +
>  include/uapi/linux/elf.h                      |  11 ++
>  35 files changed, 560 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> 
> 
> base-commit: f8788d86ab28f61f7b46eb6be375f8a726783636
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul Elliott" <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"Amit Kachhap" <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@redhat.com>,
	"H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	"Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	nd@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Sudakshina Das" <sudi.das@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:39:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320173945.GC27072@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org>

The 03/16/2020 16:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> This patch series implements support for ARMv8.5-A Branch Target
> Identification (BTI), which is a control flow integrity protection
> feature introduced as part of the ARMv8.5-A extensions.

i was playing with this and it seems the kernel does not add
PROT_BTI to non-static executables (i.e. there is an interpreter).

i thought any elf that the kernel maps would get PROT_BTI from the
kernel. (i want to remove the mprotect in glibc when not necessary)

i tested by linking a hello world exe with -Wl,-z,force-bti (and
verified that the property note is there) and expected it to crash
(with SIGILL) when the dynamic linker jumps to _start in the exe,
but it executed without errors (if i do the mprotect in glibc then
i get SIGILL as expected).

is this deliberate? does the kernel map static exe and dynamic
linked exe differently?

i cant tell looking at the patches where this logic comes from.

> 
> Changes:
> 
> v10:
>  - Fix build for !COMPAT configurations.
> v9:
>  - Move Kconfig addition to final patch in series.
>  - Add patch from Daniel Kiss adding BTI information to smaps, this has
>    a trivial conflict with a .rst conversion in -next.
> v8:
>  - Remove a redundant IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI) check.
> v7:
>  - Rebase onto v5.6-rc3.
>  - Move comment about keeping NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 internal into first
>    patch.
>  - Add an explicit check for system_supports_bti() when parsing BTI ELF
>    property for improved robustness.
> v6:
>  - Rebase onto v5.6-rc1.
>  - Fix typos s/BYTPE/BTYPE/ in commit log for "arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE
>    bits when printing PSTATE".
> v5:
>  - Changed a bunch of -EIO to -ENOEXEC in the ELF parsing code.
>  - Move PSR_BTYPE defines to UAPI.
>  - Use compat_user_mode() rather than open coding.
>  - Fix a typo s/BYTPE/BTYPE/ in syscall.c
> v4:
>  - Dropped patch fixing existing documentation as it has already been merged.
>  - Convert WARN_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() in "ELF: Add ELF program property
>    parsing support".
>  - Added display of guarded pages to ptdump.
>  - Updated for conversion of exception handling from assembler to C.
> 
> Notes:
> 
>  * GCC 9 can compile backwards-compatible BTI-enabled code with
>    -mbranch-protection=bti or -mbranch-protection=standard.
> 
>  * Binutils 2.33 and later support the new ELF note.
> 
>    Creation of a BTI-enabled binary requires _everything_ linked in to
>    be BTI-enabled.  For now ld --force-bti can be used to override this,
>    but some things may break until the required C library support is in
>    place.
> 
>    There is no straightforward way to mark a .s file as BTI-enabled:
>    scraping the output from gcc -S works as a quick hack for now.
> 
>    readelf -n can be used to examing the program properties in an ELF
>    file.
> 
>  * Runtime mmap() and mprotect() can be used to enable BTI on a
>    page-by-page basis using the new PROT_BTI, but the code in the
>    affected pages still needs to be written or compiled to contain the
>    appropriate BTI landing pads.
> 
> Daniel Kiss (1):
>   mm: smaps: Report arm64 guarded pages in smaps
> 
> Dave Martin (11):
>   ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties
>   ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support
>   arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support
>   elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags
>   arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties
>   arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE
>   arm64: unify native/compat instruction skipping
>   arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations
>   arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
>   KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
>   arm64: BTI: Add Kconfig entry for userspace BTI
> 
> Mark Brown (1):
>   arm64: mm: Display guarded pages in ptdump
> 
>  Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst |   2 +
>  Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst            |   5 +
>  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt            |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  25 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h              |   3 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h           |   6 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h                  |  50 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h                  |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/exception.h            |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h                |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h          |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h                 |  37 +++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h        |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h              |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h               |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h               |   4 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h           |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/mman.h            |   9 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h          |   9 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c                |  33 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c                   |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c              |  11 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/process.c                   |  36 ++++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c                    |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c                    |  16 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c                   |  18 +++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c                     | 131 ++++++++--------
>  arch/arm64/mm/dump.c                          |   5 +
>  fs/Kconfig.binfmt                             |   6 +
>  fs/binfmt_elf.c                               | 145 +++++++++++++++++-
>  fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c                        |   4 +
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c                            |   3 +
>  include/linux/elf.h                           |  43 ++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h                            |   3 +
>  include/uapi/linux/elf.h                      |  11 ++
>  35 files changed, 560 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
> 
> 
> base-commit: f8788d86ab28f61f7b46eb6be375f8a726783636
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-16 16:50 [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 01/13] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 02/13] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 03/13] arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 04/13] elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 05/13] arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 06/13] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 07/13] arm64: unify native/compat instruction skipping Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 08/13] arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 09/13] arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 10/13] KVM: " Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 11/13] arm64: mm: Display guarded pages in ptdump Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 12/13] mm: smaps: Report arm64 guarded pages in smaps Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50 ` [PATCH v10 13/13] arm64: BTI: Add Kconfig entry for userspace BTI Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-16 16:50   ` Mark Brown
2020-03-17 18:49 ` [PATCH v10 00/13] arm64: Branch Target Identification support Catalin Marinas
2020-03-17 18:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-17 18:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-20 17:39 ` Szabolcs Nagy [this message]
2020-03-20 17:39   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-03-20 17:39   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-03-23 12:21   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-23 12:21     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-23 12:21     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-23 13:24     ` Mark Brown
2020-03-23 13:24       ` Mark Brown
2020-03-23 13:24       ` Mark Brown
2020-03-23 13:57       ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 13:57         ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 13:57         ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 14:39         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-23 14:39           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-23 14:39           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-23 14:39           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-23 14:55           ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 14:55             ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 14:55             ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 15:32             ` Mark Brown
2020-03-23 15:32               ` Mark Brown
2020-03-23 15:32               ` Mark Brown
2020-03-23 15:32               ` Mark Brown
2020-03-24 15:43             ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-03-24 15:43               ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-03-24 15:43               ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-03-24 15:43               ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-03-23 15:02           ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 15:02             ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-23 15:02             ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-22 15:44 ` Mark Brown
2020-04-22 15:44   ` Mark Brown
2020-04-22 15:44   ` Mark Brown
2020-04-22 16:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-22 16:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-22 16:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-28 13:28     ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 13:28       ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 13:28       ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 15:12       ` Mark Brown
2020-04-28 15:12         ` Mark Brown
2020-04-28 15:12         ` Mark Brown
2020-04-28 15:18         ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 15:18           ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 15:18           ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 15:58           ` Mark Brown
2020-04-28 15:58             ` Mark Brown
2020-04-28 15:58             ` Mark Brown
2020-04-28 16:01             ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 16:01               ` Will Deacon
2020-04-28 16:01               ` Will Deacon
2020-04-30 21:26               ` Will Deacon
2020-04-30 21:26                 ` Will Deacon
2020-04-30 21:26                 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200320173945.GC27072@arm.com \
    --to=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=esyr@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.elliott@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.