From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Guru Das Srinagesh" <gurus@codeaurora.org>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Subbaraman Narayanamurthy" <subbaram@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:24:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324142441.GD442973@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324130410.dwlg767ku6kwequv@holly.lan>
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Lee,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
> > > > > to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
> > > > > dividend instead of a straight division operation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> > > > > Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Can this patch be taken on its own?
> > >
> > > Hellooooo ...
> >
> > Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
> > others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
> > to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.
>
> ... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
> otherwise there's no point in taking it.
Right.
I'm happy to wait for Thierry. Although this isn't the only set he's
currently blocking. Is he okay? On holiday perhaps?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Guru Das Srinagesh" <gurus@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Subbaraman Narayanamurthy" <subbaram@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:24:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324142441.GD442973@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324130410.dwlg767ku6kwequv@holly.lan>
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Lee,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
> > > > > to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
> > > > > dividend instead of a straight division operation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> > > > > Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Can this patch be taken on its own?
> > >
> > > Hellooooo ...
> >
> > Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
> > others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
> > to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.
>
> ... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
> otherwise there's no point in taking it.
Right.
I'm happy to wait for Thierry. Although this isn't the only set he's
currently blocking. Is he okay? On holiday perhaps?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Guru Das Srinagesh" <gurus@codeaurora.org>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Subbaraman Narayanamurthy" <subbaram@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:24:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324142441.GD442973@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324130410.dwlg767ku6kwequv@holly.lan>
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:57:35PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Hello Lee,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:07:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.period's datatype
> > > > > to u64, prepare for this transition by using div_u64 to handle a 64-bit
> > > > > dividend instead of a straight division operation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> > > > > Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > Can this patch be taken on its own?
> > >
> > > Hellooooo ...
> >
> > Conceptually it can. As the last patch depends on this one (and the
> > others) some coordination might be beneficial. But that's up to Thierry
> > to decide how (and if) he want this series to be applied.
>
> ... and on the backlight side we definitely need to know about the "if"
> otherwise there's no point in taking it.
Right.
I'm happy to wait for Thierry. Although this isn't the only set he's
currently blocking. Is he okay? On holiday perhaps?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-24 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-20 1:41 [PATCH v11 00/12] Convert PWM period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 01/12] drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 02/12] hwmon: pwm-fan: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 03/12] ir-rx51: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 04/12] pwm: clps711x: Cast period to u32 before use as divisor Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 17:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-07 0:26 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 05/12] pwm: pwm-imx-tpm: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 06/12] pwm: imx27: Use 64-bit division macro and function Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 17:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-30 20:43 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-31 15:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-31 20:20 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-31 20:49 ` Thierry Reding
2020-04-02 20:16 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-02 20:55 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-02 21:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-03 17:37 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-04-03 19:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 07/12] pwm: sifive: Use 64-bit division macro Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 08/12] pwm: stm32-lp: Use %llu format specifier for period Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 10:45 ` Joe Perches
2020-03-30 19:30 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 09/12] pwm: sun4i: Use 64-bit division function Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 17:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 10/12] backlight: pwm_bl: " Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-20 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-20 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-24 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-24 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-24 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-24 12:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-24 12:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-24 12:57 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-24 13:04 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-03-24 13:04 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-03-24 13:04 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-03-24 14:24 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-03-24 14:24 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-24 14:24 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-24 14:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-24 14:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-24 14:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-04-15 9:26 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-15 9:26 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-15 9:26 ` Lee Jones
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 11/12] clk: pwm: Assign u64 divisor to unsigned int before use Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 17:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-03-20 18:42 ` David Laight
2020-04-07 2:40 ` Guru Das Srinagesh
2020-03-20 1:41 ` [PATCH v11 12/12] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64 Guru Das Srinagesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200324142441.GD442973@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gurus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.