From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Refactor master_cfg/fwspec usage
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:08:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326150841.10083-11-joro@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326150841.10083-1-joro@8bytes.org>
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
In preparation for restructuring iommu_fwspec, refactor the way we
access the arm_smmu_master_cfg private data to be less dependent on
the current layout.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 980aae73b45b..3cef2bfd6f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -98,12 +98,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg {
s16 smendx[];
};
#define INVALID_SMENDX -1
-#define __fwspec_cfg(fw) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)fw->iommu_priv)
-#define fwspec_smmu(fw) (__fwspec_cfg(fw)->smmu)
-#define fwspec_smendx(fw, i) \
- (i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : __fwspec_cfg(fw)->smendx[i])
-#define for_each_cfg_sme(fw, i, idx) \
- for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
+#define cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i) \
+ (i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : cfg->smendx[i])
+#define for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fw, i, idx) \
+ for (i = 0; idx = cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
static bool using_legacy_binding, using_generic_binding;
@@ -1069,7 +1067,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
/* Figure out a viable stream map entry allocation */
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
@@ -1100,7 +1098,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
iommu_group_put(group);
/* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
}
@@ -1117,14 +1115,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
return ret;
}
-static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
+static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
+ struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
{
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
- struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
int i, idx;
mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (arm_smmu_free_sme(smmu, idx))
arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
@@ -1133,6 +1131,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
}
static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
@@ -1146,7 +1145,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
else
type = S2CR_TYPE_TRANS;
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (type == s2cr[idx].type && cbndx == s2cr[idx].cbndx)
continue;
@@ -1162,8 +1161,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
{
int ret;
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
@@ -1177,10 +1177,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
* domains, just say no (but more politely than by dereferencing NULL).
* This should be at least a WARN_ON once that's sorted.
*/
- if (!fwspec->iommu_priv)
+ cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ if (!cfg)
return -ENODEV;
- smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+ smmu = cfg->smmu;
ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -1204,7 +1205,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
}
/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
- ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
+ ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, cfg, fwspec);
/*
* Setup an autosuspend delay to avoid bouncing runpm state.
@@ -1475,7 +1476,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
return;
iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
- arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
+ arm_smmu_master_free_smes(cfg, fwspec);
arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
@@ -1487,11 +1488,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
int i, idx;
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
--
2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Refactor master_cfg/fwspec usage
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:08:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326150841.10083-11-joro@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326150841.10083-1-joro@8bytes.org>
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
In preparation for restructuring iommu_fwspec, refactor the way we
access the arm_smmu_master_cfg private data to be less dependent on
the current layout.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 980aae73b45b..3cef2bfd6f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -98,12 +98,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg {
s16 smendx[];
};
#define INVALID_SMENDX -1
-#define __fwspec_cfg(fw) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)fw->iommu_priv)
-#define fwspec_smmu(fw) (__fwspec_cfg(fw)->smmu)
-#define fwspec_smendx(fw, i) \
- (i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : __fwspec_cfg(fw)->smendx[i])
-#define for_each_cfg_sme(fw, i, idx) \
- for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
+#define cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i) \
+ (i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : cfg->smendx[i])
+#define for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fw, i, idx) \
+ for (i = 0; idx = cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
static bool using_legacy_binding, using_generic_binding;
@@ -1069,7 +1067,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
/* Figure out a viable stream map entry allocation */
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
@@ -1100,7 +1098,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
iommu_group_put(group);
/* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
}
@@ -1117,14 +1115,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
return ret;
}
-static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
+static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
+ struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
{
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
- struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
int i, idx;
mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (arm_smmu_free_sme(smmu, idx))
arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
@@ -1133,6 +1131,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
}
static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
@@ -1146,7 +1145,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
else
type = S2CR_TYPE_TRANS;
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (type == s2cr[idx].type && cbndx == s2cr[idx].cbndx)
continue;
@@ -1162,8 +1161,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
{
int ret;
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
@@ -1177,10 +1177,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
* domains, just say no (but more politely than by dereferencing NULL).
* This should be at least a WARN_ON once that's sorted.
*/
- if (!fwspec->iommu_priv)
+ cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ if (!cfg)
return -ENODEV;
- smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+ smmu = cfg->smmu;
ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -1204,7 +1205,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
}
/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
- ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
+ ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, cfg, fwspec);
/*
* Setup an autosuspend delay to avoid bouncing runpm state.
@@ -1475,7 +1476,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
return;
iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
- arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
+ arm_smmu_master_free_smes(cfg, fwspec);
arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
@@ -1487,11 +1488,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
int i, idx;
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
guohanjun@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Refactor master_cfg/fwspec usage
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:08:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326150841.10083-11-joro@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326150841.10083-1-joro@8bytes.org>
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
In preparation for restructuring iommu_fwspec, refactor the way we
access the arm_smmu_master_cfg private data to be less dependent on
the current layout.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 980aae73b45b..3cef2bfd6f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -98,12 +98,10 @@ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg {
s16 smendx[];
};
#define INVALID_SMENDX -1
-#define __fwspec_cfg(fw) ((struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *)fw->iommu_priv)
-#define fwspec_smmu(fw) (__fwspec_cfg(fw)->smmu)
-#define fwspec_smendx(fw, i) \
- (i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : __fwspec_cfg(fw)->smendx[i])
-#define for_each_cfg_sme(fw, i, idx) \
- for (i = 0; idx = fwspec_smendx(fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
+#define cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i) \
+ (i >= fw->num_ids ? INVALID_SMENDX : cfg->smendx[i])
+#define for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fw, i, idx) \
+ for (i = 0; idx = cfg_smendx(cfg, fw, i), i < fw->num_ids; ++i)
static bool using_legacy_binding, using_generic_binding;
@@ -1069,7 +1067,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
/* Figure out a viable stream map entry allocation */
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
u16 sid = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, fwspec->ids[i]);
u16 mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, fwspec->ids[i]);
@@ -1100,7 +1098,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
iommu_group_put(group);
/* It worked! Now, poke the actual hardware */
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
smmu->s2crs[idx].group = group;
}
@@ -1117,14 +1115,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_master_alloc_smes(struct device *dev)
return ret;
}
-static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
+static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
+ struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
{
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
- struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
int i, idx;
mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (arm_smmu_free_sme(smmu, idx))
arm_smmu_write_sme(smmu, idx);
cfg->smendx[i] = INVALID_SMENDX;
@@ -1133,6 +1131,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_master_free_smes(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
}
static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg,
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
@@ -1146,7 +1145,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_add_master(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
else
type = S2CR_TYPE_TRANS;
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (type == s2cr[idx].type && cbndx == s2cr[idx].cbndx)
continue;
@@ -1162,8 +1161,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
{
int ret;
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
@@ -1177,10 +1177,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
* domains, just say no (but more politely than by dereferencing NULL).
* This should be at least a WARN_ON once that's sorted.
*/
- if (!fwspec->iommu_priv)
+ cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ if (!cfg)
return -ENODEV;
- smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+ smmu = cfg->smmu;
ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -1204,7 +1205,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
}
/* Looks ok, so add the device to the domain */
- ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, fwspec);
+ ret = arm_smmu_domain_add_master(smmu_domain, cfg, fwspec);
/*
* Setup an autosuspend delay to avoid bouncing runpm state.
@@ -1475,7 +1476,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
return;
iommu_device_unlink(&smmu->iommu, dev);
- arm_smmu_master_free_smes(fwspec);
+ arm_smmu_master_free_smes(cfg, fwspec);
arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
@@ -1487,11 +1488,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
- struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = fwspec_smmu(fwspec);
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = fwspec->iommu_priv;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = cfg->smmu;
struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
int i, idx;
- for_each_cfg_sme(fwspec, i, idx) {
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
if (group && smmu->s2crs[idx].group &&
group != smmu->s2crs[idx].group)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-26 15:08 [PATCH v4 00/16] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device' Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu: Define dev_iommu_fwspec_get() for !CONFIG_IOMMU_API Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] ACPI/IORT: Remove direct access of dev->iommu_fwspec Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-27 3:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-03-27 3:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-03-27 3:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2020-03-27 8:45 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-03-27 8:45 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-03-27 8:45 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] drm/msm/mdp5: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/tegra-gart: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu: Rename struct iommu_param to dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix uninitilized variable warning Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu: Introduce accessors for iommu private data Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use accessor functions " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Refactor master_cfg/fwspec usage Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu: Use accessor functions for iommu private data Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/renesas: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/mediatek: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/qcom: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/virtio: " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu: Move fwspec->iommu_priv to struct dev_iommu Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-26 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-27 10:16 ` [PATCH v4 00/16] iommu: Move iommu_fwspec out of 'struct device' Joerg Roedel
2020-03-27 10:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-27 10:16 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200326150841.10083-11-joro@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.