From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mmu: no write cache for O_SYNC flag
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:55:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326165520.GD26987@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326163625.30714-1-li.wang@windriver.com>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:36:25AM -0700, Li Wang wrote:
> reproduce steps:
> 1.
> disable CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in linux kernel
> 2.
> Process A gets a Physical Address of global variable by
> "/proc/self/pagemap".
> 3.
> Process B writes a value to the same Physical Address by mmap():
> fd=open("/dev/mem",O_SYNC);
> Virtual Address=mmap(fd);
>
> problem symptom:
> after Process B write a value to the Physical Address,
> Process A of the value of global variable does not change.
> They both W/R the same Physical Address.
>
> technical reason:
> Process B writing the Physical Address is by the Virtual Address,
> and the Virtual Address comes from "/dev/mem" and mmap().
> In arm64 arch, the Virtual Address has write cache.
> So, maybe the value is not written into Physical Address.
>
> fix reason:
> giving write cache flag in arm64 is in phys_mem_access_prot():
> =====
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> phys_mem_access_prot()
> {
> if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> return pgprot_noncached(vma_prot);
> else if (file->f_flags & O_SYNC)
> return pgprot_writecombine(vma_prot);
> return vma_prot;
> }
> ====
> the other arch and the share function drivers/char/mem.c of phys_mem_access_prot()
> does not add write cache flag.
> So, removing the flag to fix the issue
Other architectures may have transparent caches and don't require
different attributes.
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 128f70852bf3..d7083965ca17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
> {
> if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> return pgprot_noncached(vma_prot);
> - else if (file->f_flags & O_SYNC)
> - return pgprot_writecombine(vma_prot);
> return vma_prot;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_mem_access_prot);
A better solution is for user space not to pass O_SYNC when opening
/dev/mem. We've had this ABI for a long time (arch/arm/ and several
other architectures do the same), why change it now?
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mmu: no write cache for O_SYNC flag
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:55:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326165520.GD26987@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326163625.30714-1-li.wang@windriver.com>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:36:25AM -0700, Li Wang wrote:
> reproduce steps:
> 1.
> disable CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in linux kernel
> 2.
> Process A gets a Physical Address of global variable by
> "/proc/self/pagemap".
> 3.
> Process B writes a value to the same Physical Address by mmap():
> fd=open("/dev/mem",O_SYNC);
> Virtual Address=mmap(fd);
>
> problem symptom:
> after Process B write a value to the Physical Address,
> Process A of the value of global variable does not change.
> They both W/R the same Physical Address.
>
> technical reason:
> Process B writing the Physical Address is by the Virtual Address,
> and the Virtual Address comes from "/dev/mem" and mmap().
> In arm64 arch, the Virtual Address has write cache.
> So, maybe the value is not written into Physical Address.
>
> fix reason:
> giving write cache flag in arm64 is in phys_mem_access_prot():
> =====
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> phys_mem_access_prot()
> {
> if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> return pgprot_noncached(vma_prot);
> else if (file->f_flags & O_SYNC)
> return pgprot_writecombine(vma_prot);
> return vma_prot;
> }
> ====
> the other arch and the share function drivers/char/mem.c of phys_mem_access_prot()
> does not add write cache flag.
> So, removing the flag to fix the issue
Other architectures may have transparent caches and don't require
different attributes.
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.wang@windriver.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 128f70852bf3..d7083965ca17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
> {
> if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> return pgprot_noncached(vma_prot);
> - else if (file->f_flags & O_SYNC)
> - return pgprot_writecombine(vma_prot);
> return vma_prot;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(phys_mem_access_prot);
A better solution is for user space not to pass O_SYNC when opening
/dev/mem. We've had this ABI for a long time (arch/arm/ and several
other architectures do the same), why change it now?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-26 16:36 [PATCH] arm64: mmu: no write cache for O_SYNC flag Li Wang
2020-03-26 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2020-03-26 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-26 17:34 ` Wang, Li
2020-03-27 14:29 ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-27 14:29 ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-27 16:47 ` Wang, Li
2020-03-27 17:02 ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-27 17:02 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200326165520.GD26987@mbp \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=li.wang@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.