All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Cc: wangle6@huawei.com, vigneshr@ti.com, richard@nod.at,
	zhangweimin12@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, houtao1@huawei.com,
	yebin10@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd:clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad clocks repeatedly
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:53:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200330095341.284048c3@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1585400477-65705-1-git-send-email-nixiaoming@huawei.com>

Hi Xiaoming,

Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com> wrote on Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:01:17
+0800:

> The function call process is as follows:
> 	mtd_blktrans_work()
> 	  while (1)
> 	    do_blktrans_request()
> 	      mtdblock_writesect()
> 	        do_cached_write()
> 	          write_cached_data() /*if cache_state is STATE_DIRTY*/
> 	            erase_write()
> 
> write_cached_data() returns failure without modifying cache_state
> and cache_offset. so when do_cached_write() is called again,
> write_cached_data() will be called again to perform erase_write()
> on the same cache_offset.
> 
> but if this cache_offset points to a bad block, erase_write() will
> always return -EIO. Writing to this mtdblk is equivalent to losing
> the current data, and repeatedly writing to the bad block.
> 
> Repeatedly writing a bad block has no real benefits,
> but brings some negative effects:
> 1 Lost subsequent data
> 2 Loss of flash device life
> 3 erase_write() bad blocks are very time-consuming. for example:
> 	the function do_erase_oneblock() in chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c or
> 	chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c may take more than 20 seconds to return
> 
> Therefore, when erase_write() returns -EIO in write_cached_data(),
> clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad clocks repeatedly.

                                            blocks

> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c
> index 078e0f6..98c25d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c
> @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int write_cached_data (struct mtdblk_dev *mtdblk)
>  
>  	ret = erase_write (mtd, mtdblk->cache_offset,
>  			   mtdblk->cache_size, mtdblk->cache_data);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Here we could arguably set the cache state to STATE_CLEAN.
> @@ -98,9 +96,14 @@ static int write_cached_data (struct mtdblk_dev *mtdblk)
>  	 * be notified if this content is altered on the flash by other
>  	 * means.  Let's declare it empty and leave buffering tasks to
>  	 * the buffer cache instead.
> +	 *
> +	 * if this cache_offset points to a bad block

Can you start your sentences with a capital letter please?

	 * If

> +	 * data cannot be written to the device.
> +	 * clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad clocks repeatedly

	 * Clear

And also please break your lines à 80, not 70.

>  	 */
> -	mtdblk->cache_state = STATE_EMPTY;
> -	return 0;
> +	if (ret == 0 || ret == -EIO)
> +		mtdblk->cache_state = STATE_EMPTY;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  

Otherwise looks good to me.

With the above addressed:

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>


Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Cc: <richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<wangle6@huawei.com>, <zhangweimin12@huawei.com>,
	<yebin10@huawei.com>, <houtao1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd:clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad clocks repeatedly
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:53:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200330095341.284048c3@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1585400477-65705-1-git-send-email-nixiaoming@huawei.com>

Hi Xiaoming,

Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com> wrote on Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:01:17
+0800:

> The function call process is as follows:
> 	mtd_blktrans_work()
> 	  while (1)
> 	    do_blktrans_request()
> 	      mtdblock_writesect()
> 	        do_cached_write()
> 	          write_cached_data() /*if cache_state is STATE_DIRTY*/
> 	            erase_write()
> 
> write_cached_data() returns failure without modifying cache_state
> and cache_offset. so when do_cached_write() is called again,
> write_cached_data() will be called again to perform erase_write()
> on the same cache_offset.
> 
> but if this cache_offset points to a bad block, erase_write() will
> always return -EIO. Writing to this mtdblk is equivalent to losing
> the current data, and repeatedly writing to the bad block.
> 
> Repeatedly writing a bad block has no real benefits,
> but brings some negative effects:
> 1 Lost subsequent data
> 2 Loss of flash device life
> 3 erase_write() bad blocks are very time-consuming. for example:
> 	the function do_erase_oneblock() in chips/cfi_cmdset_0020.c or
> 	chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c may take more than 20 seconds to return
> 
> Therefore, when erase_write() returns -EIO in write_cached_data(),
> clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad clocks repeatedly.

                                            blocks

> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c
> index 078e0f6..98c25d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdblock.c
> @@ -89,8 +89,6 @@ static int write_cached_data (struct mtdblk_dev *mtdblk)
>  
>  	ret = erase_write (mtd, mtdblk->cache_offset,
>  			   mtdblk->cache_size, mtdblk->cache_data);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Here we could arguably set the cache state to STATE_CLEAN.
> @@ -98,9 +96,14 @@ static int write_cached_data (struct mtdblk_dev *mtdblk)
>  	 * be notified if this content is altered on the flash by other
>  	 * means.  Let's declare it empty and leave buffering tasks to
>  	 * the buffer cache instead.
> +	 *
> +	 * if this cache_offset points to a bad block

Can you start your sentences with a capital letter please?

	 * If

> +	 * data cannot be written to the device.
> +	 * clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad clocks repeatedly

	 * Clear

And also please break your lines à 80, not 70.

>  	 */
> -	mtdblk->cache_state = STATE_EMPTY;
> -	return 0;
> +	if (ret == 0 || ret == -EIO)
> +		mtdblk->cache_state = STATE_EMPTY;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  

Otherwise looks good to me.

With the above addressed:

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>


Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-30  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-28 13:01 [PATCH] mtd:clear cache_state to avoid writing to bad clocks repeatedly Xiaoming Ni
2020-03-28 13:01 ` Xiaoming Ni
2020-03-30  7:53 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-03-30  7:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-30  8:44   ` Xiaoming Ni
2020-03-30  8:44     ` Xiaoming Ni
2020-03-30  8:47     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-30  8:47       ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-30  7:54 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-30  7:54   ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200330095341.284048c3@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=wangle6@huawei.com \
    --cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangweimin12@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.