From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow SGIs to switch between HW and SW interrupts
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:16:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331121645.388250-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331121645.388250-1-maz@kernel.org>
In order to let a guest buy in the new, active-less SGIs, we
need to be able to switch between the two modes.
Handle this by stopping all guest activity, transfer the state
from one mode to the other, and resume the guest. Nothing calls
this code so far, but a later patch will plug it into the MMIO
emulation.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-20-maz@kernel.org
---
include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 3 ++
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 63457908c9c4..69f4164d6477 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ struct vgic_dist {
/* distributor enabled */
bool enabled;
+ /* Wants SGIs without active state */
+ bool nassgireq;
+
struct vgic_irq *spis;
struct vgic_io_device dist_iodev;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index c2fcde104ea2..27ac833e5ec7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -97,6 +97,104 @@ static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+static void vgic_v4_sync_sgi_config(struct its_vpe *vpe, struct vgic_irq *irq)
+{
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].enabled = irq->enabled;
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].group = irq->group;
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].priority = irq->priority;
+}
+
+static void vgic_v4_enable_vsgis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct its_vpe *vpe = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * With GICv4.1, every virtual SGI can be directly injected. So
+ * let's pretend that they are HW interrupts, tied to a host
+ * IRQ. The SGI code will do its magic.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < VGIC_NR_SGIS; i++) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, i);
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+ if (irq->hw)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ irq->hw = true;
+ irq->host_irq = irq_find_mapping(vpe->sgi_domain, i);
+
+ /* Transfer the full irq state to the vPE */
+ vgic_v4_sync_sgi_config(vpe, irq);
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq);
+ ret = irq_domain_activate_irq(irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc),
+ false);
+ if (!WARN_ON(ret)) {
+ /* Transfer pending state */
+ ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+ IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+ irq->pending_latch);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+ irq->pending_latch = false;
+ }
+ unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+ vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+ }
+}
+
+static void vgic_v4_disable_vsgis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VGIC_NR_SGIS; i++) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, i);
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+ if (!irq->hw)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ irq->hw = false;
+ ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+ IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+ &irq->pending_latch);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq);
+ irq_domain_deactivate_irq(irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc));
+ unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+ vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Must be called with the kvm lock held */
+void vgic_v4_configure_vsgis(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int i;
+
+ kvm_arm_halt_guest(kvm);
+
+ kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+ if (dist->nassgireq)
+ vgic_v4_enable_vsgis(vcpu);
+ else
+ vgic_v4_disable_vsgis(vcpu);
+ }
+
+ kvm_arm_resume_guest(kvm);
+}
+
/**
* vgic_v4_init - Initialize the GICv4 data structures
* @kvm: Pointer to the VM being initialized
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
index c7fefd6b1c80..769e4802645e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
@@ -316,5 +316,6 @@ void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct kvm *kvm);
bool vgic_supports_direct_msis(struct kvm *kvm);
int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm);
void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm);
+void vgic_v4_configure_vsgis(struct kvm *kvm);
#endif
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow SGIs to switch between HW and SW interrupts
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:16:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331121645.388250-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331121645.388250-1-maz@kernel.org>
In order to let a guest buy in the new, active-less SGIs, we
need to be able to switch between the two modes.
Handle this by stopping all guest activity, transfer the state
from one mode to the other, and resume the guest. Nothing calls
this code so far, but a later patch will plug it into the MMIO
emulation.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-20-maz@kernel.org
---
include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 3 ++
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 63457908c9c4..69f4164d6477 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ struct vgic_dist {
/* distributor enabled */
bool enabled;
+ /* Wants SGIs without active state */
+ bool nassgireq;
+
struct vgic_irq *spis;
struct vgic_io_device dist_iodev;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index c2fcde104ea2..27ac833e5ec7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -97,6 +97,104 @@ static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+static void vgic_v4_sync_sgi_config(struct its_vpe *vpe, struct vgic_irq *irq)
+{
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].enabled = irq->enabled;
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].group = irq->group;
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].priority = irq->priority;
+}
+
+static void vgic_v4_enable_vsgis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct its_vpe *vpe = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * With GICv4.1, every virtual SGI can be directly injected. So
+ * let's pretend that they are HW interrupts, tied to a host
+ * IRQ. The SGI code will do its magic.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < VGIC_NR_SGIS; i++) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, i);
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+ if (irq->hw)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ irq->hw = true;
+ irq->host_irq = irq_find_mapping(vpe->sgi_domain, i);
+
+ /* Transfer the full irq state to the vPE */
+ vgic_v4_sync_sgi_config(vpe, irq);
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq);
+ ret = irq_domain_activate_irq(irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc),
+ false);
+ if (!WARN_ON(ret)) {
+ /* Transfer pending state */
+ ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+ IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+ irq->pending_latch);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+ irq->pending_latch = false;
+ }
+ unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+ vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+ }
+}
+
+static void vgic_v4_disable_vsgis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VGIC_NR_SGIS; i++) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, i);
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+ if (!irq->hw)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ irq->hw = false;
+ ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+ IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+ &irq->pending_latch);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq);
+ irq_domain_deactivate_irq(irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc));
+ unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+ vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Must be called with the kvm lock held */
+void vgic_v4_configure_vsgis(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int i;
+
+ kvm_arm_halt_guest(kvm);
+
+ kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+ if (dist->nassgireq)
+ vgic_v4_enable_vsgis(vcpu);
+ else
+ vgic_v4_disable_vsgis(vcpu);
+ }
+
+ kvm_arm_resume_guest(kvm);
+}
+
/**
* vgic_v4_init - Initialize the GICv4 data structures
* @kvm: Pointer to the VM being initialized
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
index c7fefd6b1c80..769e4802645e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
@@ -316,5 +316,6 @@ void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct kvm *kvm);
bool vgic_supports_direct_msis(struct kvm *kvm);
int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm);
void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm);
+void vgic_v4_configure_vsgis(struct kvm *kvm);
#endif
--
2.25.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow SGIs to switch between HW and SW interrupts
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:16:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331121645.388250-12-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331121645.388250-1-maz@kernel.org>
In order to let a guest buy in the new, active-less SGIs, we
need to be able to switch between the two modes.
Handle this by stopping all guest activity, transfer the state
from one mode to the other, and resume the guest. Nothing calls
this code so far, but a later patch will plug it into the MMIO
emulation.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-20-maz@kernel.org
---
include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 3 ++
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 63457908c9c4..69f4164d6477 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ struct vgic_dist {
/* distributor enabled */
bool enabled;
+ /* Wants SGIs without active state */
+ bool nassgireq;
+
struct vgic_irq *spis;
struct vgic_io_device dist_iodev;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
index c2fcde104ea2..27ac833e5ec7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
@@ -97,6 +97,104 @@ static irqreturn_t vgic_v4_doorbell_handler(int irq, void *info)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
+static void vgic_v4_sync_sgi_config(struct its_vpe *vpe, struct vgic_irq *irq)
+{
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].enabled = irq->enabled;
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].group = irq->group;
+ vpe->sgi_config[irq->intid].priority = irq->priority;
+}
+
+static void vgic_v4_enable_vsgis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct its_vpe *vpe = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.its_vpe;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * With GICv4.1, every virtual SGI can be directly injected. So
+ * let's pretend that they are HW interrupts, tied to a host
+ * IRQ. The SGI code will do its magic.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < VGIC_NR_SGIS; i++) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, i);
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+ if (irq->hw)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ irq->hw = true;
+ irq->host_irq = irq_find_mapping(vpe->sgi_domain, i);
+
+ /* Transfer the full irq state to the vPE */
+ vgic_v4_sync_sgi_config(vpe, irq);
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq);
+ ret = irq_domain_activate_irq(irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc),
+ false);
+ if (!WARN_ON(ret)) {
+ /* Transfer pending state */
+ ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+ IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+ irq->pending_latch);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+ irq->pending_latch = false;
+ }
+ unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+ vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+ }
+}
+
+static void vgic_v4_disable_vsgis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VGIC_NR_SGIS; i++) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, i);
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+ if (!irq->hw)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ irq->hw = false;
+ ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+ IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+ &irq->pending_latch);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
+
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq);
+ irq_domain_deactivate_irq(irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc));
+ unlock:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+ vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Must be called with the kvm lock held */
+void vgic_v4_configure_vsgis(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ int i;
+
+ kvm_arm_halt_guest(kvm);
+
+ kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
+ if (dist->nassgireq)
+ vgic_v4_enable_vsgis(vcpu);
+ else
+ vgic_v4_disable_vsgis(vcpu);
+ }
+
+ kvm_arm_resume_guest(kvm);
+}
+
/**
* vgic_v4_init - Initialize the GICv4 data structures
* @kvm: Pointer to the VM being initialized
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
index c7fefd6b1c80..769e4802645e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
@@ -316,5 +316,6 @@ void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct kvm *kvm);
bool vgic_supports_direct_msis(struct kvm *kvm);
int vgic_v4_init(struct kvm *kvm);
void vgic_v4_teardown(struct kvm *kvm);
+void vgic_v4_configure_vsgis(struct kvm *kvm);
#endif
--
2.25.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-31 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-31 12:16 [GIT PULL] KVM/arm updates for Linux 5.7 Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: arm64: Use the correct timer structure to access the physical counter Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 02/15] arm: Unplug KVM from the build system Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 03/15] arm: Remove KVM from config files Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 04/15] arm: Remove 32bit KVM host support Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 05/15] arm: Remove HYP/Stage-2 page-table support Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 06/15] arm: Remove GICv3 vgic compatibility macros Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 07/15] arm: Remove the ability to set HYP vectors outside of the decompressor Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 08/15] MAINTAINERS: RIP KVM/arm Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Let doorbells be auto-enabled Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Add direct injection capability to SGI registers Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow SGIs to switch between HW and SW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Plumb SGI implementation selection in the distributor Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Reload VLPI configuration on distributor enable/disable Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow non-trapping WFI when using HW SGIs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Expose HW-based SGIs in debugfs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-31 14:45 ` [GIT PULL] KVM/arm updates for Linux 5.7 Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-31 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-31 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200331121645.388250-12-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.