From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Handle memory allocation failure in readahead
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:48:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401164825.GC80283@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200401112321.GF21484@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 04:23:21AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:31:25PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 08:04:21PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
> > >
> > > bio_alloc() can fail when we use GFP_NORETRY. If it does, allocate
> > > a bio large enough for a single page like mpage_readpages() does.
> >
> > Why does mpage_readpages() do that?
> >
> > Is this a means to guarantee some kind of forward (readahead?) progress?
> > Forgive my ignorance, but if memory is so tight we can't allocate a bio
> > for readahead then why not exit having accomplished nothing?
>
> As far as I can tell, it's just a general fallback in mpage_readpages().
>
> * If anything unusual happens, such as:
> *
> * - encountering a page which has buffers
> * - encountering a page which has a non-hole after a hole
> * - encountering a page with non-contiguous blocks
> *
> * then this code just gives up and calls the buffer_head-based read function.
>
> The actual code for that is:
>
> args->bio = mpage_alloc(bdev, blocks[0] << (blkbits - 9),
> min_t(int, args->nr_pages,
> BIO_MAX_PAGES),
> gfp);
> if (args->bio == NULL)
> goto confused;
> ...
> confused:
> if (args->bio)
> args->bio = mpage_bio_submit(REQ_OP_READ, op_flags, args->bio);
> if (!PageUptodate(page))
> block_read_full_page(page, args->get_block);
> else
> unlock_page(page);
>
> As the comment implies, there are a lot of 'goto confused' cases in
> do_mpage_readpage().
>
> Ideally, yes, we'd just give up on reading this page because it's
> only readahead, and we shouldn't stall actual work in order to reclaim
> memory so we can finish doing readahead. However, handling a partial
> page read is painful. Allocating a bio big enough for a single page is
> much easier on the mm than allocating a larger bio (for a start, it's a
> single allocation, not a pair of allocations), so this is a reasonable
> compromise between simplicity of code and quality of implementation.
Hmm, ok. I'll add a comment about that:
/*
* If the bio_alloc fails, try it again for a single page to
* avoid having to deal with partial page reads. This emulates
* what do_mpage_readpage does.
*/
if (!ctx->bio)
ctx->bio = bio_alloc(orig_gfp, 1);
...in the hopes that if anyone ever makes partial page reads less
painful, they'll hopefully find this breadcrumb and clean up iomap too.
If that's ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-01 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-01 3:04 [PATCH] iomap: Handle memory allocation failure in readahead Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-01 4:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-04-01 11:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-01 16:48 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-04-01 16:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-01 15:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200401164825.GC80283@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.