From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>
Cc: Mao Wenan <maowenan@huawei.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
kuba@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andriin@fb.com,
jwi@linux.ibm.com, jianglidong3@jd.com, edumazet@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] veth: xdp: use head instead of hard_start
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:06:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402110619.48f31a63@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ede2f407-839e-d29e-0ebe-aa39dd461bfd@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:47:03 +0900
Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2020/04/02 1:15, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> ...
> > [PATCH RFC net-next] veth: adjust hard_start offset on redirect XDP frames
> >
> > When native XDP redirect into a veth device, the frame arrives in the
> > xdp_frame structure. It is then processed in veth_xdp_rcv_one(),
> > which can run a new XDP bpf_prog on the packet. Doing so requires
> > converting xdp_frame to xdp_buff, but the tricky part is that
> > xdp_frame memory area is located in the top (data_hard_start) memory
> > area that xdp_buff will point into.
> >
> > The current code tried to protect the xdp_frame area, by assigning
> > xdp_buff.data_hard_start past this memory. This results in 32 bytes
> > less headroom to expand into via BPF-helper bpf_xdp_adjust_head().
> >
> > This protect step is actually not needed, because BPF-helper
> > bpf_xdp_adjust_head() already reserve this area, and don't allow
> > BPF-prog to expand into it. Thus, it is safe to point data_hard_start
> > directly at xdp_frame memory area.
> >
> > Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>
> FYI: This mail address is deprecated.
>
> > Fixes: 9fc8d518d9d5 ("veth: Handle xdp_frames in xdp napi ring")
> > Reported-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
>
> FWIW,
>
> Acked-by: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>
Thanks.
I have updated your email and added your ack in my patchset. I will
submit this officially once net-next opens up again[1], as part my
larger patchset for introducing XDP frame_sz.
[1] http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>
Cc: Mao Wenan <maowenan@huawei.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
kuba@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andriin@fb.com,
jwi@linux.ibm.com, jianglidong3@jd.com, edumazet@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] veth: xdp: use head instead of hard_start
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 09:06:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402110619.48f31a63@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ede2f407-839e-d29e-0ebe-aa39dd461bfd@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:47:03 +0900
Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2020/04/02 1:15, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> ...
> > [PATCH RFC net-next] veth: adjust hard_start offset on redirect XDP frames
> >
> > When native XDP redirect into a veth device, the frame arrives in the
> > xdp_frame structure. It is then processed in veth_xdp_rcv_one(),
> > which can run a new XDP bpf_prog on the packet. Doing so requires
> > converting xdp_frame to xdp_buff, but the tricky part is that
> > xdp_frame memory area is located in the top (data_hard_start) memory
> > area that xdp_buff will point into.
> >
> > The current code tried to protect the xdp_frame area, by assigning
> > xdp_buff.data_hard_start past this memory. This results in 32 bytes
> > less headroom to expand into via BPF-helper bpf_xdp_adjust_head().
> >
> > This protect step is actually not needed, because BPF-helper
> > bpf_xdp_adjust_head() already reserve this area, and don't allow
> > BPF-prog to expand into it. Thus, it is safe to point data_hard_start
> > directly at xdp_frame memory area.
> >
> > Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>
> FYI: This mail address is deprecated.
>
> > Fixes: 9fc8d518d9d5 ("veth: Handle xdp_frames in xdp napi ring")
> > Reported-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
>
> FWIW,
>
> Acked-by: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>
Thanks.
I have updated your email and added your ack in my patchset. I will
submit this officially once net-next opens up again[1], as part my
larger patchset for introducing XDP frame_sz.
[1] http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-30 10:26 [PATCH net] veth: xdp: use head instead of hard_start Mao Wenan
2020-03-30 10:26 ` Mao Wenan
2020-03-30 11:34 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-03-30 11:34 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-03-30 23:35 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-03-30 23:35 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-03-31 3:56 ` maowenan
2020-03-31 3:56 ` maowenan
2020-03-31 5:45 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-03-31 5:45 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-03-31 6:06 ` [PATCH net v2] " Mao Wenan
2020-03-31 6:06 ` Mao Wenan
2020-03-31 6:16 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-03-31 6:16 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-04-01 16:15 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-04-01 16:15 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-04-02 0:47 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-04-02 0:47 ` Toshiaki Makita
2020-04-02 9:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-04-02 9:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-04-02 15:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-04-02 15:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-04-03 7:58 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-04-03 7:58 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-04-03 21:12 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-04-03 21:12 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-04-02 1:23 ` maowenan
2020-04-02 1:23 ` maowenan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200402110619.48f31a63@carbon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jianglidong3@jd.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maowenan@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.