From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Parametrize PFIT_PIPE
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 16:55:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200402135543.GX13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200401224825.GA14274@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:48:26PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:43:51PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Make the PFIT_PIPE stuff less ugly via parametrization.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 3 +--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > > index cba2f1c2557f..8b0730f4c442 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > > @@ -434,8 +434,7 @@ void intel_gmch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > > /* 965+ wants fuzzy fitting */
> > > /* FIXME: handle multiple panels by failing gracefully */
> > > if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4)
> > > - pfit_control |= ((intel_crtc->pipe << PFIT_PIPE_SHIFT) |
> > > - PFIT_FILTER_FUZZY);
> > > + pfit_control |= PFIT_PIPE(intel_crtc->pipe) | PFIT_FILTER_FUZZY;
> > >
> > > out:
> > > if ((pfit_control & PFIT_ENABLE) == 0) {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index b09c1d6dc0aa..faf8945a51b0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -4928,6 +4928,7 @@ enum {
> > > #define PFIT_ENABLE (1 << 31)
> > > #define PFIT_PIPE_MASK (3 << 29)
> > > #define PFIT_PIPE_SHIFT 29
> > > +#define PFIT_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe) << 29)
> >
> > This is fine, but might have as well defined this in terms of
> > REG_FIELD_PREP. I especially like it for parametrized stuff because it
> > ensures we don't flood the value outside the field.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Was just reviewing this series and noticed that Jani had suggested using
> REG_FIELD_PREP stuff here, are you going to change that Ville?
IIRC I already pushed this.
>
> Looks good otherwise
>
> Manasi
> >
> > > #define VERT_INTERP_DISABLE (0 << 10)
> > > #define VERT_INTERP_BILINEAR (1 << 10)
> > > #define VERT_INTERP_MASK (3 << 10)
> >
> > --
> > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-02 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 16:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/i915: pfit/scaler rework prep stuff Ville Syrjala
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Parametrize PFIT_PIPE Ville Syrjala
2020-02-12 17:43 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-13 15:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-01 22:48 ` Manasi Navare
2020-04-02 13:55 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Use intel_de_write_fw() for skl+ scaler registers Ville Syrjala
2020-02-12 17:47 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: Fix skl+ non-scaled pfit modes Ville Syrjala
2020-04-01 23:35 ` Manasi Navare
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/i915: Flatten a bunch of the pfit functions Ville Syrjala
2020-04-01 23:53 ` Manasi Navare
2020-04-02 13:55 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-04-21 23:32 ` Manasi Navare
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/i915: Use drm_rect to store the pfit window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/i915: s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ in pfit functions Ville Syrjala
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/i915: Pass connector state to pfit calculations Ville Syrjala
2020-02-12 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/i915: Have pfit calculations return an error code Ville Syrjala
2020-02-13 6:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: pfit/scaler rework prep stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-16 22:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200402135543.GX13686@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.