From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: johan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
git@xilinx.com, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] serial: uartps: Revert dynamic port allocation
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:44:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200403094427.GA3754220@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9598635-a8ef-eff2-22e8-4fa37f8390b3@xilinx.com>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:37:46AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 03. 04. 20 11:32, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:24:29AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> there were several changes done in past in uartps drivers which have been
> >> also done in uartlite driver.
> >> Here is the thread about it
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20191203152738.GF10631@localhost/
> >>
> >> This series reverts all patches which enabled dynamic port allocation and
> >> returning driver to the previous state. There were added some features in
> >> meantime which are not affected by this series.
> >
> > Should this go into 5.7-final as it's causing problems now, and
> > backported as well? Or can it wait until 5.8-rc1?
>
> These patches have been added to v4.20. It means all version from that
> are affected.
>
> The issue I am aware of is when you setup stdout-path =
> "serialX:115200n8" where X is not 0.
>
> But as was discussed the concept is based on Johan wrong that's why it
> can be consider as bug fix.
Ok, I'll queue these up after 5.7-rc1 is out, for inclusion in
5.7-final, and cc: for stable, as I agree, they should all be reverted.
Thanks for doing the work.
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: monstr@monstr.eu, johan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
git@xilinx.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] serial: uartps: Revert dynamic port allocation
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 11:44:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200403094427.GA3754220@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9598635-a8ef-eff2-22e8-4fa37f8390b3@xilinx.com>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:37:46AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 03. 04. 20 11:32, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 11:24:29AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> there were several changes done in past in uartps drivers which have been
> >> also done in uartlite driver.
> >> Here is the thread about it
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20191203152738.GF10631@localhost/
> >>
> >> This series reverts all patches which enabled dynamic port allocation and
> >> returning driver to the previous state. There were added some features in
> >> meantime which are not affected by this series.
> >
> > Should this go into 5.7-final as it's causing problems now, and
> > backported as well? Or can it wait until 5.8-rc1?
>
> These patches have been added to v4.20. It means all version from that
> are affected.
>
> The issue I am aware of is when you setup stdout-path =
> "serialX:115200n8" where X is not 0.
>
> But as was discussed the concept is based on Johan wrong that's why it
> can be consider as bug fix.
Ok, I'll queue these up after 5.7-rc1 is out, for inclusion in
5.7-final, and cc: for stable, as I agree, they should all be reverted.
Thanks for doing the work.
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-03 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 9:24 [PATCH 0/7] serial: uartps: Revert dynamic port allocation Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` [PATCH 1/7] Revert "serial: uartps: Fix uartps_major handling" Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` [PATCH 2/7] Revert "serial: uartps: Use the same dynamic major number for all ports" Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` [PATCH 3/7] Revert "serial: uartps: Fix error path when alloc failed" Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` [PATCH 4/7] Revert "serial: uartps: Do not allow use aliases >= MAX_UART_INSTANCES" Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` [PATCH 5/7] Revert "serial: uartps: Change uart ID port allocation" Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` [PATCH 6/7] Revert "serial: uartps: Move Port ID to device data structure" Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` [PATCH 7/7] Revert "serial: uartps: Register own uart console and driver structures" Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:24 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:32 ` [PATCH 0/7] serial: uartps: Revert dynamic port allocation Greg KH
2020-04-03 9:32 ` Greg KH
2020-04-03 9:37 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:37 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:44 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-04-03 9:44 ` Greg KH
2020-04-03 9:51 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 9:51 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 15:48 ` Maarten Brock
2020-04-03 15:48 ` Maarten Brock
2020-04-03 15:56 ` Michal Simek
2020-04-03 15:56 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200403094427.GA3754220@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=git@xilinx.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.