All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Roy Pledge <Roy.Pledge@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Youri Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>,
	soc@kernel.org, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: dpio: avoid stack usage warning
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:24:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200408202421.GU25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408185834.434784-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:58:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A 1024 byte variable on the stack will warn on any 32-bit architecture
> during compile-testing, and is generally a bad idea anyway:
> 
> fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c: In function 'dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq':
> fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c:495:1: error: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
> 
> There are currently no callers of this function, so I cannot tell whether
> dynamic memory allocation is allowed once callers are added. Change
> it to kcalloc for now, if anyone gets a warning about calling this in
> atomic context after they start using it, they can fix it later.
> 
> Fixes: 9d98809711ae ("soc: fsl: dpio: Adding QMAN multiple enqueue interface")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> index cd4f6410e8c2..ff0ef8cbdbff 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> @@ -478,12 +478,17 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d,
>  				const struct dpaa2_fd *fd,
>  				int nb)
>  {
> -	int i;
> -	struct qbman_eq_desc ed[32];
> +	struct qbman_eq_desc *ed = kcalloc(sizeof(struct qbman_eq_desc), 32, GFP_KERNEL);

I think you need to rearrange this to be more compliant with the coding
style.

> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	if (!ed)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	d = service_select(d);
> -	if (!d)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	if (!d) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
>  		qbman_eq_desc_clear(&ed[i]);
> @@ -491,7 +496,10 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d,
>  		qbman_eq_desc_set_fq(&ed[i], fqid[i]);
>  	}
>  
> -	return qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb);
> +	ret = qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb);
> +out:
> +	kfree(ed);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq);
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Roy Pledge <Roy.Pledge@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Youri Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>,
	soc@kernel.org, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: dpio: avoid stack usage warning
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:24:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200408202421.GU25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408185834.434784-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:58:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A 1024 byte variable on the stack will warn on any 32-bit architecture
> during compile-testing, and is generally a bad idea anyway:
> 
> fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c: In function 'dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq':
> fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c:495:1: error: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
> 
> There are currently no callers of this function, so I cannot tell whether
> dynamic memory allocation is allowed once callers are added. Change
> it to kcalloc for now, if anyone gets a warning about calling this in
> atomic context after they start using it, they can fix it later.
> 
> Fixes: 9d98809711ae ("soc: fsl: dpio: Adding QMAN multiple enqueue interface")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> index cd4f6410e8c2..ff0ef8cbdbff 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> @@ -478,12 +478,17 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d,
>  				const struct dpaa2_fd *fd,
>  				int nb)
>  {
> -	int i;
> -	struct qbman_eq_desc ed[32];
> +	struct qbman_eq_desc *ed = kcalloc(sizeof(struct qbman_eq_desc), 32, GFP_KERNEL);

I think you need to rearrange this to be more compliant with the coding
style.

> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	if (!ed)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	d = service_select(d);
> -	if (!d)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	if (!d) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
>  		qbman_eq_desc_clear(&ed[i]);
> @@ -491,7 +496,10 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d,
>  		qbman_eq_desc_set_fq(&ed[i], fqid[i]);
>  	}
>  
> -	return qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb);
> +	ret = qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb);
> +out:
> +	kfree(ed);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq);
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: soc@kernel.org, Roy Pledge <Roy.Pledge@nxp.com>,
	Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	Youri Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: dpio: avoid stack usage warning
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 21:24:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200408202421.GU25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408185834.434784-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:58:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A 1024 byte variable on the stack will warn on any 32-bit architecture
> during compile-testing, and is generally a bad idea anyway:
> 
> fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c: In function 'dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq':
> fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c:495:1: error: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
> 
> There are currently no callers of this function, so I cannot tell whether
> dynamic memory allocation is allowed once callers are added. Change
> it to kcalloc for now, if anyone gets a warning about calling this in
> atomic context after they start using it, they can fix it later.
> 
> Fixes: 9d98809711ae ("soc: fsl: dpio: Adding QMAN multiple enqueue interface")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> index cd4f6410e8c2..ff0ef8cbdbff 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> @@ -478,12 +478,17 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d,
>  				const struct dpaa2_fd *fd,
>  				int nb)
>  {
> -	int i;
> -	struct qbman_eq_desc ed[32];
> +	struct qbman_eq_desc *ed = kcalloc(sizeof(struct qbman_eq_desc), 32, GFP_KERNEL);

I think you need to rearrange this to be more compliant with the coding
style.

> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	if (!ed)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	d = service_select(d);
> -	if (!d)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	if (!d) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb; i++) {
>  		qbman_eq_desc_clear(&ed[i]);
> @@ -491,7 +496,10 @@ int dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq(struct dpaa2_io *d,
>  		qbman_eq_desc_set_fq(&ed[i], fqid[i]);
>  	}
>  
> -	return qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb);
> +	ret = qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc(d->swp, &ed[0], fd, nb);
> +out:
> +	kfree(ed);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dpaa2_io_service_enqueue_multiple_desc_fq);
>  
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-08 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-08 18:58 [PATCH] soc: fsl: dpio: avoid stack usage warning Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-08 18:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-08 18:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-08 20:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-04-08 20:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-08 20:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-17 14:58   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-17 14:58     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-17 14:58     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200408202421.GU25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=Roy.Pledge@nxp.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=soc@kernel.org \
    --cc=youri.querry_1@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.