From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
"Soeren Moch" <smoch@web.de>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Hugh Cole-Baker" <sigmaris@gmail.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"Katsuhiro Suzuki" <katsuhiro@katsuster.net>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Markus Reichl" <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>, "Kukjin Kim" <kgene@kernel.org>,
"Jagan Teki" <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Nick Xie" <nick@khadas.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Andrius Štikonas" <andrius@stikonas.eu>,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra" <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: pwm: replace flag 0 with PWM_NOFLAGS
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200409121432.GA802@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200405192246.3741784-5-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:44PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The raw value '0' in the 3rd cell of the "pwms" property means there are
> no flags to be set.
>
> This patch converts '0' flag into PWM_NOFLAGS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use PWM_NOFLAGS instead of PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL to avoid possible
> conflict with enum pwm_polarity in <linux/pwm.h>. Also, this name
> reflects the sense of this value more precisely.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinebook.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg-s400.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-sei510.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-u200.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-x96-max.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-odroid-n2.dts | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-ugoos-am6.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nanopi-k2.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-p20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s805x-p241.dts | 3 ++-
> .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-hwacom-amazetv.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-khadas-vim.dts | 2 +-
> .../arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-p212.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-khadas-vim2.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-rbox-pro.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 +++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-khadas-vim3l.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-sei610.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi | 3 ++-
I understand you are going to push it through arm-soc, so:
For Exynos:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Otherwise if you expect individual maintainers to pick it up, please
split per architecture.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Andrius Štikonas" <andrius@stikonas.eu>,
"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra" <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Hugh Cole-Baker" <sigmaris@gmail.com>,
"Jagan Teki" <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
"Katsuhiro Suzuki" <katsuhiro@katsuster.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: pwm: replace flag 0 with PWM_NOFLAGS
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200409121432.GA802@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200405192246.3741784-5-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:44PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The raw value '0' in the 3rd cell of the "pwms" property means there are
> no flags to be set.
>
> This patch converts '0' flag into PWM_NOFLAGS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use PWM_NOFLAGS instead of PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL to avoid possible
> conflict with enum pwm_polarity in <linux/pwm.h>. Also, this name
> reflects the sense of this value more precisely.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinebook.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg-s400.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-sei510.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-u200.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-x96-max.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-odroid-n2.dts | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-ugoos-am6.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nanopi-k2.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-p20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s805x-p241.dts | 3 ++-
> .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-hwacom-amazetv.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-khadas-vim.dts | 2 +-
> .../arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-p212.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-khadas-vim2.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-rbox-pro.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 +++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-khadas-vim3l.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-sei610.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi | 3 ++-
I understand you are going to push it through arm-soc, so:
For Exynos:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Otherwise if you expect individual maintainers to pick it up, please
split per architecture.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Andrius Štikonas" <andrius@stikonas.eu>,
"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra" <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Hugh Cole-Baker" <sigmaris@gmail.com>,
"Jagan Teki" <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
"Katsuhiro Suzuki" <katsuhiro@katsuster.net>,
"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Kukjin Kim" <kgene@kernel.org>,
"Markus Reichl" <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Nick Xie" <nick@khadas.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Soeren Moch" <smoch@web.de>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: pwm: replace flag 0 with PWM_NOFLAGS
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200409121432.GA802@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200405192246.3741784-5-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:44PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The raw value '0' in the 3rd cell of the "pwms" property means there are
> no flags to be set.
>
> This patch converts '0' flag into PWM_NOFLAGS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use PWM_NOFLAGS instead of PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL to avoid possible
> conflict with enum pwm_polarity in <linux/pwm.h>. Also, this name
> reflects the sense of this value more precisely.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinebook.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg-s400.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-sei510.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-u200.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-x96-max.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-odroid-n2.dts | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-ugoos-am6.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nanopi-k2.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-p20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s805x-p241.dts | 3 ++-
> .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-hwacom-amazetv.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-khadas-vim.dts | 2 +-
> .../arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-p212.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-khadas-vim2.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-rbox-pro.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 +++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-khadas-vim3l.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-sei610.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi | 3 ++-
I understand you are going to push it through arm-soc, so:
For Exynos:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Otherwise if you expect individual maintainers to pick it up, please
split per architecture.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
"Soeren Moch" <smoch@web.de>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Hugh Cole-Baker" <sigmaris@gmail.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"Katsuhiro Suzuki" <katsuhiro@katsuster.net>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Markus Reichl" <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>, "Kukjin Kim" <kgene@kernel.org>,
"Jagan Teki" <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Nick Xie" <nick@khadas.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Andrius Štikonas" <andrius@stikonas.eu>,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra" <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
"Andy Yan" <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: pwm: replace flag 0 with PWM_NOFLAGS
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200409121432.GA802@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200405192246.3741784-5-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 10:22:44PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The raw value '0' in the 3rd cell of the "pwms" property means there are
> no flags to be set.
>
> This patch converts '0' flag into PWM_NOFLAGS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use PWM_NOFLAGS instead of PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL to avoid possible
> conflict with enum pwm_polarity in <linux/pwm.h>. Also, this name
> reflects the sense of this value more precisely.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pinebook.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-teres-i.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg-s400.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12-common.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-sei510.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-u200.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12a-x96-max.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-odroid-n2.dts | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-ugoos-am6.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx-p23x-q20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx.dtsi | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nanopi-k2.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-p20x.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-vega-s95.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxbb-wetek.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s805x-p241.dts | 3 ++-
> .../boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-hwacom-amazetv.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-khadas-vim.dts | 2 +-
> .../arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-p212.dtsi | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-khadas-vim2.dts | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxm-rbox-pro.dts | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-khadas-vim3.dtsi | 4 +++-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-khadas-vim3l.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-sm1-sei610.dts | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2-common.dtsi | 3 ++-
I understand you are going to push it through arm-soc, so:
For Exynos:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Otherwise if you expect individual maintainers to pick it up, please
split per architecture.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-09 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-05 19:22 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Add PWM_NOFLAGS property flag Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: pwm: add PWM_NOFLAGS definition Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: document the PWM no-flag Oleksandr Suvorov
[not found] ` <20200405192246.3741784-3-oleksandr.suvorov-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-04-07 6:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-04-07 6:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20200407061646.pcglaw43kfmrag6a-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-04-07 10:51 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-07 10:51 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
[not found] ` <CAGgjyvH5nmnXH068QTNPKzsjocNXfEP_yh0HO=L-oGaqQdYRuA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2020-04-07 11:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-04-07 11:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-04-07 14:55 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
[not found] ` <20200405192246.3741784-1-oleksandr.suvorov-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-04-05 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: dts: pwm: replace flag 1 with PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] arm: " Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: pwm: replace flag 0 with PWM_NOFLAGS Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-04-05 19:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] arm: " Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-05 19:22 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-04-09 12:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200409121432.GA802@kozik-lap \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=andrius@stikonas.eu \
--cc=andy.yan@rock-chips.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=igor.opaniuk@toradex.com \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
--cc=katsuhiro@katsuster.net \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.reichl@fivetechno.de \
--cc=marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nick@khadas.com \
--cc=oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com \
--cc=pbarker@konsulko.com \
--cc=philippe.schenker@toradex.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sigmaris@gmail.com \
--cc=smoch@web.de \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.