From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org,
psodagud@codeaurora.org, rishabhb@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: core: Prevent sleep when rproc crashes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:26:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200411022627.GA826227@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586384305-7825-3-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org>
On Wed 08 Apr 15:18 PDT 2020, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
> Remoteproc recovery should be fast and any delay will have an impact on the
> user-experience. Add a wakeup source to remoteproc which ensures that the
> system does not go into idle state while a remoteproc is recovering, thus
> prevent any delays that might occur during system resume.
>
This is better, but I think it can be reworded further to show that it's
not a matter of making it "fast", it's a matter of preventing suspend
from interrupting the recovery of a remoteproc.
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 1 +
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index 7a63efb..6bb2c7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
> adsp->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + device_wakeup_enable(adsp->dev);
Move this 5 lines down and give it an empty line before and after.
> adsp->rproc = rproc;
> adsp->pas_id = desc->pas_id;
> adsp->has_aggre2_clk = desc->has_aggre2_clk;
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 9f99fe2..19a360d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1729,6 +1729,8 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> if (!rproc->recovery_disabled)
> rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
> +
> + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2273,6 +2275,8 @@ void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type)
> return;
> }
>
/* Prevent suspend while the remoteproc is being recovered */
PS. This patch is unrelated to patch 1/2, so please resubmit it
separately.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
> +
> dev_err(&rproc->dev, "crash detected in %s: type %s\n",
> rproc->name, rproc_crash_to_string(type));
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org,
psodagud@codeaurora.org, rishabhb@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: core: Prevent sleep when rproc crashes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:26:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200411022627.GA826227@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586384305-7825-3-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org>
On Wed 08 Apr 15:18 PDT 2020, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
> Remoteproc recovery should be fast and any delay will have an impact on the
> user-experience. Add a wakeup source to remoteproc which ensures that the
> system does not go into idle state while a remoteproc is recovering, thus
> prevent any delays that might occur during system resume.
>
This is better, but I think it can be reworded further to show that it's
not a matter of making it "fast", it's a matter of preventing suspend
from interrupting the recovery of a remoteproc.
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 1 +
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index 7a63efb..6bb2c7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
> adsp->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + device_wakeup_enable(adsp->dev);
Move this 5 lines down and give it an empty line before and after.
> adsp->rproc = rproc;
> adsp->pas_id = desc->pas_id;
> adsp->has_aggre2_clk = desc->has_aggre2_clk;
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 9f99fe2..19a360d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1729,6 +1729,8 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> if (!rproc->recovery_disabled)
> rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
> +
> + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2273,6 +2275,8 @@ void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type)
> return;
> }
>
/* Prevent suspend while the remoteproc is being recovered */
PS. This patch is unrelated to patch 1/2, so please resubmit it
separately.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
> +
> dev_err(&rproc->dev, "crash detected in %s: type %s\n",
> rproc->name, rproc_crash_to_string(type));
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, tsoni@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rishabhb@codeaurora.org,
psodagud@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: core: Prevent sleep when rproc crashes
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:26:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200411022627.GA826227@builder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586384305-7825-3-git-send-email-sidgup@codeaurora.org>
On Wed 08 Apr 15:18 PDT 2020, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
> Remoteproc recovery should be fast and any delay will have an impact on the
> user-experience. Add a wakeup source to remoteproc which ensures that the
> system does not go into idle state while a remoteproc is recovering, thus
> prevent any delays that might occur during system resume.
>
This is better, but I think it can be reworded further to show that it's
not a matter of making it "fast", it's a matter of preventing suspend
from interrupting the recovery of a remoteproc.
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 1 +
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index 7a63efb..6bb2c7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
> adsp->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + device_wakeup_enable(adsp->dev);
Move this 5 lines down and give it an empty line before and after.
> adsp->rproc = rproc;
> adsp->pas_id = desc->pas_id;
> adsp->has_aggre2_clk = desc->has_aggre2_clk;
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 9f99fe2..19a360d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1729,6 +1729,8 @@ static void rproc_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> if (!rproc->recovery_disabled)
> rproc_trigger_recovery(rproc);
> +
> + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -2273,6 +2275,8 @@ void rproc_report_crash(struct rproc *rproc, enum rproc_crash_type type)
> return;
> }
>
/* Prevent suspend while the remoteproc is being recovered */
PS. This patch is unrelated to patch 1/2, so please resubmit it
separately.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
> +
> dev_err(&rproc->dev, "crash detected in %s: type %s\n",
> rproc->name, rproc_crash_to_string(type));
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-11 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 22:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] remoteproc: core: Add core functionality to the remoteproc framework Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 22:18 ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 22:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: core: Add an API for changing firmware name Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 22:18 ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-16 19:23 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-16 19:23 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-08 22:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] remoteproc: core: Prevent sleep when rproc crashes Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-08 22:18 ` Siddharth Gupta
2020-04-11 2:26 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2020-04-11 2:26 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-11 2:26 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-16 19:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-16 19:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200411022627.GA826227@builder.lan \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rishabhb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.