All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	chris.p.wilson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: peel dma-fence-chains wait fences
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:09:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004111310.6qAhf3aF%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410165158.29546-3-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>

Hi Venkata,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next linus/master v5.6 next-20200410]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Venkata-Sandeep-Dhanalakota/drm-i915-introduce-a-mechanism-to-extend-execbuf2/20200411-031057
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>


cppcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2550:12: warning: Either the condition '!iter_chain' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: iter_chain. [nullPointerRedundantCheck]
              iter_chain->fence);
              ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2547:16: note: Assuming that condition '!iter_chain' is not redundant
       GEM_BUG_ON(!iter_chain);
                  ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2545:24: note: Assignment 'iter_chain=to_dma_fence_chain(iter)', assigned value is 0
        to_dma_fence_chain(iter);
                          ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2550:12: note: Null pointer dereference
              iter_chain->fence);
              ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1423:6: warning: The scope of the variable 'err' can be reduced. [variableScope]
    int err;
        ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:3158:1: warning: Label 'end_user' is not used. [unusedLabel]
   end_user:
   ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1346:21: warning: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
      len = offset & 7 ? 8 : 5;
                       ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1401:24: warning: 'vaddr' is of type 'void *'. When using void pointers in calculations, the behaviour is undefined. [arithOperationsOnVoidPointer]
    clflush_write32(vaddr + offset_in_page(offset),
                          ^

vim +2550 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c

  2510	
  2511	static int
  2512	await_fence_array(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
  2513			  struct i915_eb_fences *fences,
  2514			  int nfences)
  2515	{
  2516		unsigned int n;
  2517		int err;
  2518	
  2519		for (n = 0; n < nfences; n++) {
  2520			struct drm_syncobj *syncobj;
  2521			struct dma_fence_chain *chain;
  2522			unsigned int flags;
  2523	
  2524			syncobj = ptr_unpack_bits(fences[n].syncobj, &flags, 2);
  2525	
  2526			if (!fences[n].dma_fence)
  2527				continue;
  2528	
  2529			/*
  2530			 * If we're dealing with a dma-fence-chain, peel the chain by
  2531			 * adding all of the unsignaled fences
  2532			 * (dma_fence_chain_for_each does that for us) the chain
  2533			 * points to.
  2534			 *
  2535			 * This enables us to identify waits on i915 fences and allows
  2536			 * for faster engine-to-engine synchronization using HW
  2537			 * semaphores.
  2538			 */
  2539			chain = to_dma_fence_chain(fences[n].dma_fence);
  2540			if (chain) {
  2541				struct dma_fence *iter;
  2542	
  2543				dma_fence_chain_for_each(iter, fences[n].dma_fence) {
  2544					struct dma_fence_chain *iter_chain =
  2545						to_dma_fence_chain(iter);
  2546	
  2547					GEM_BUG_ON(!iter_chain);
  2548	
  2549					err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(eb->request,
> 2550									   iter_chain->fence);
  2551					if (err < 0) {
  2552						dma_fence_put(iter);
  2553						return err;
  2554					}
  2555				}
  2556	
  2557			} else {
  2558				err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(eb->request,
  2559								   fences[n].dma_fence);
  2560				if (err < 0)
  2561					return err;
  2562			}
  2563		}
  2564	
  2565		return 0;
  2566	}
  2567	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: peel dma-fence-chains wait fences
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 13:09:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004111310.6qAhf3aF%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200410165158.29546-3-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4246 bytes --]

Hi Venkata,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on drm-tip/drm-tip]
[cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next linus/master v5.6 next-20200410]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Venkata-Sandeep-Dhanalakota/drm-i915-introduce-a-mechanism-to-extend-execbuf2/20200411-031057
base:   git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>


cppcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2550:12: warning: Either the condition '!iter_chain' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: iter_chain. [nullPointerRedundantCheck]
              iter_chain->fence);
              ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2547:16: note: Assuming that condition '!iter_chain' is not redundant
       GEM_BUG_ON(!iter_chain);
                  ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2545:24: note: Assignment 'iter_chain=to_dma_fence_chain(iter)', assigned value is 0
        to_dma_fence_chain(iter);
                          ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2550:12: note: Null pointer dereference
              iter_chain->fence);
              ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1423:6: warning: The scope of the variable 'err' can be reduced. [variableScope]
    int err;
        ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:3158:1: warning: Label 'end_user' is not used. [unusedLabel]
   end_user:
   ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1346:21: warning: Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'. [clarifyCalculation]
      len = offset & 7 ? 8 : 5;
                       ^
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1401:24: warning: 'vaddr' is of type 'void *'. When using void pointers in calculations, the behaviour is undefined. [arithOperationsOnVoidPointer]
    clflush_write32(vaddr + offset_in_page(offset),
                          ^

vim +2550 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c

  2510	
  2511	static int
  2512	await_fence_array(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
  2513			  struct i915_eb_fences *fences,
  2514			  int nfences)
  2515	{
  2516		unsigned int n;
  2517		int err;
  2518	
  2519		for (n = 0; n < nfences; n++) {
  2520			struct drm_syncobj *syncobj;
  2521			struct dma_fence_chain *chain;
  2522			unsigned int flags;
  2523	
  2524			syncobj = ptr_unpack_bits(fences[n].syncobj, &flags, 2);
  2525	
  2526			if (!fences[n].dma_fence)
  2527				continue;
  2528	
  2529			/*
  2530			 * If we're dealing with a dma-fence-chain, peel the chain by
  2531			 * adding all of the unsignaled fences
  2532			 * (dma_fence_chain_for_each does that for us) the chain
  2533			 * points to.
  2534			 *
  2535			 * This enables us to identify waits on i915 fences and allows
  2536			 * for faster engine-to-engine synchronization using HW
  2537			 * semaphores.
  2538			 */
  2539			chain = to_dma_fence_chain(fences[n].dma_fence);
  2540			if (chain) {
  2541				struct dma_fence *iter;
  2542	
  2543				dma_fence_chain_for_each(iter, fences[n].dma_fence) {
  2544					struct dma_fence_chain *iter_chain =
  2545						to_dma_fence_chain(iter);
  2546	
  2547					GEM_BUG_ON(!iter_chain);
  2548	
  2549					err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(eb->request,
> 2550									   iter_chain->fence);
  2551					if (err < 0) {
  2552						dma_fence_put(iter);
  2553						return err;
  2554					}
  2555				}
  2556	
  2557			} else {
  2558				err = i915_request_await_dma_fence(eb->request,
  2559								   fences[n].dma_fence);
  2560				if (err < 0)
  2561					return err;
  2562			}
  2563		}
  2564	
  2565		return 0;
  2566	}
  2567	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-11  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-10 16:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: introduce a mechanism to extend execbuf2 Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
2020-04-10 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: add syncobj timeline support Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
2020-04-10 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: peel dma-fence-chains wait fences Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
2020-04-11  5:09   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-04-11  5:09     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-11  8:50   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2020-04-13  1:32     ` Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
2020-04-10 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/selftests: selftest for timeline semaphore Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
2020-04-10 21:11   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-10 21:11     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-14 13:19   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2020-04-10 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] drm/i915: introduce a mechanism to extend execbuf2 Patchwork
2020-04-10 17:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-04-10 17:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202004111310.6qAhf3aF%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.