All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de, baolin.wang7@gmail.com,
	orsonzhai@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Implement the request_atomic() API
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:40:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004131201.LSx92dnS%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ed34afa9fb42e0c234065cac5401d7826942b55.1586744073.git.baolin.wang7@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3257 bytes --]

Hi Baolin,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
[cannot apply to arm-soc/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/Introduce-the-request_atomic-for-the-host/20200413-105346
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 8f3d9f354286745c751374f5f1fcafee6b3f3136
config: riscv-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=riscv 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c: In function 'sdhci_request_atomic':
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2076:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_present_error' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2076 |  if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2081:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_manual_cmd23'; did you mean 'sdhci_auto_cmd12'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2081 |  cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
         |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |        sdhci_auto_cmd12
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2090:6: error: invalid use of void expression
    2090 |  if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
         |      ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/sdhci_present_error +2076 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c

  2066	
  2067	int sdhci_request_atomic(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
  2068	{
  2069		struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
  2070		struct mmc_command *cmd;
  2071		unsigned long flags;
  2072		int ret = 0;
  2073	
  2074		spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
  2075	
> 2076		if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
  2077			sdhci_finish_mrq(host, mrq);
  2078			goto out_finish;
  2079		}
  2080	
> 2081		cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
  2082	
  2083		/*
  2084		 * The HSQ may send a command in interrupt context without polling
  2085		 * the busy signaling, which means we should return BUSY if controller
  2086		 * has not released inhibit bits to allow HSQ trying to send request
  2087		 * again in non-atomic context. So we should not finish this request
  2088		 * here.
  2089		 */
> 2090		if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
  2091			ret = -EBUSY;
  2092		else
  2093			sdhci_led_activate(host);
  2094	
  2095	out_finish:
  2096		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
  2097		return ret;
  2098	}
  2099	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_request_atomic);
  2100	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 63433 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Implement the request_atomic() API
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:40:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004131201.LSx92dnS%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ed34afa9fb42e0c234065cac5401d7826942b55.1586744073.git.baolin.wang7@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3339 bytes --]

Hi Baolin,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
[cannot apply to arm-soc/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Baolin-Wang/Introduce-the-request_atomic-for-the-host/20200413-105346
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 8f3d9f354286745c751374f5f1fcafee6b3f3136
config: riscv-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=riscv 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c: In function 'sdhci_request_atomic':
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2076:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_present_error' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2076 |  if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2081:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'sdhci_manual_cmd23'; did you mean 'sdhci_auto_cmd12'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2081 |  cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
         |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |        sdhci_auto_cmd12
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:2090:6: error: invalid use of void expression
    2090 |  if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
         |      ^
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/sdhci_present_error +2076 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c

  2066	
  2067	int sdhci_request_atomic(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
  2068	{
  2069		struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
  2070		struct mmc_command *cmd;
  2071		unsigned long flags;
  2072		int ret = 0;
  2073	
  2074		spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
  2075	
> 2076		if (sdhci_present_error(host, mrq->cmd, true)) {
  2077			sdhci_finish_mrq(host, mrq);
  2078			goto out_finish;
  2079		}
  2080	
> 2081		cmd = sdhci_manual_cmd23(host, mrq) ? mrq->sbc : mrq->cmd;
  2082	
  2083		/*
  2084		 * The HSQ may send a command in interrupt context without polling
  2085		 * the busy signaling, which means we should return BUSY if controller
  2086		 * has not released inhibit bits to allow HSQ trying to send request
  2087		 * again in non-atomic context. So we should not finish this request
  2088		 * here.
  2089		 */
> 2090		if (!sdhci_send_command(host, cmd))
  2091			ret = -EBUSY;
  2092		else
  2093			sdhci_led_activate(host);
  2094	
  2095	out_finish:
  2096		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
  2097		return ret;
  2098	}
  2099	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_request_atomic);
  2100	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 63433 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-13  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-13  2:46 [PATCH v5 0/3] Introduce the request_atomic() for the host Baolin Wang
2020-04-13  2:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] mmc: host: " Baolin Wang
2020-04-13  2:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Implement the request_atomic() API Baolin Wang
2020-04-13  4:40   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-04-13  4:40     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13  5:42   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13  5:42     ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13  6:52     ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-14 13:47   ` Adrian Hunter
2020-04-13  2:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: " Baolin Wang
2020-04-14 13:49   ` Adrian Hunter
2020-04-17 11:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Introduce the request_atomic() for the host Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202004131201.LSx92dnS%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.