* [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes
@ 2020-04-13 17:21 Jens Axboe
2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling Jens Axboe
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: io-uring
Just two minor fixes here that should go into 5.7:
- Honor async request cancelation instead of trying to re-issue when
it triggers
- Apply same re-wait approach for async poll that we do for regular poll,
in case we get spurious wakeups.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling 2020-04-13 17:21 [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:21 ` Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: io_async_task_func() should check and honor cancelation Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe We added this for just the regular poll requests in commit a6ba632d2c24 ("io_uring: retry poll if we got woken with non-matching mask"), we should do the same for the poll handler used pollable async requests. Move the re-wait check and arm into a helper, and call it from io_async_task_func() as well. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> --- fs/io_uring.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index 0d1b5d5f1251..7b41f6231955 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -4156,6 +4156,26 @@ static int __io_async_wake(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll, return 1; } +static bool io_poll_rewait(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll) + __acquires(&req->ctx->completion_lock) +{ + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; + + if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { + struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = poll->events }; + + req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & poll->events; + } + + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { + add_wait_queue(poll->head, &poll->wait); + return true; + } + + return false; +} + static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb) { struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_work); @@ -4164,14 +4184,16 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb) trace_io_uring_task_run(req->ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data); - WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&req->apoll->poll.wait.entry)); - - if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node)) { - spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); - hash_del(&req->hash_node); + if (io_poll_rewait(req, &apoll->poll)) { spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + return; } + if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node)) + hash_del(&req->hash_node); + + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + /* restore ->work in case we need to retry again */ memcpy(&req->work, &apoll->work, sizeof(req->work)); @@ -4436,18 +4458,11 @@ static void io_poll_task_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt) struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll; - if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { - struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = poll->events }; - - req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & poll->events; - } - - spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); - if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { - add_wait_queue(poll->head, &poll->wait); + if (io_poll_rewait(req, poll)) { spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); return; } + hash_del(&req->hash_node); io_poll_complete(req, req->result, 0); req->flags |= REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED; -- 2.26.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: io_async_task_func() should check and honor cancelation 2020-04-13 17:21 [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:21 ` Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe If the request has been marked as canceled, don't try and issue it. Instead just fill a canceled event and finish the request. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> --- fs/io_uring.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index 7b41f6231955..2f9e93892870 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -4181,6 +4181,7 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb) struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_work); struct async_poll *apoll = req->apoll; struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; + bool canceled; trace_io_uring_task_run(req->ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data); @@ -4192,8 +4193,21 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb) if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node)) hash_del(&req->hash_node); + canceled = READ_ONCE(apoll->poll.canceled); + if (canceled) { + io_cqring_fill_event(req, -ECANCELED); + io_commit_cqring(ctx); + } + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + if (canceled) { + kfree(apoll); + io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx); + req_set_fail_links(req); + io_put_req(req); + } + /* restore ->work in case we need to retry again */ memcpy(&req->work, &apoll->work, sizeof(req->work)); -- 2.26.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes 2020-04-13 17:21 [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: io_async_task_func() should check and honor cancelation Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:26 ` Jens Axboe 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring On 4/13/20 11:21 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > Just two minor fixes here that should go into 5.7: > > - Honor async request cancelation instead of trying to re-issue when > it triggers > > - Apply same re-wait approach for async poll that we do for regular poll, > in case we get spurious wakeups. Please see v2 instead: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20200413172606.8836-1-axboe@kernel.dk/T/#u -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCHSET v2 0/2] @ 2020-04-13 17:26 Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring Just two minor fixes here that should go into 5.7: - Honor async request cancelation instead of trying to re-issue when it triggers - Apply same re-wait approach for async poll that we do for regular poll, in case we get spurious wakeups. Quick v2, since the one I sent out was not the tested on. Patch 2 was missing a return after the io_put_req() on cancelation. -- Jens Axboe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling 2020-04-13 17:26 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:26 ` Jens Axboe 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jens Axboe @ 2020-04-13 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: io-uring; +Cc: Jens Axboe We added this for just the regular poll requests in commit a6ba632d2c24 ("io_uring: retry poll if we got woken with non-matching mask"), we should do the same for the poll handler used pollable async requests. Move the re-wait check and arm into a helper, and call it from io_async_task_func() as well. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> --- fs/io_uring.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c index 0d1b5d5f1251..7b41f6231955 100644 --- a/fs/io_uring.c +++ b/fs/io_uring.c @@ -4156,6 +4156,26 @@ static int __io_async_wake(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll, return 1; } +static bool io_poll_rewait(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll) + __acquires(&req->ctx->completion_lock) +{ + struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; + + if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { + struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = poll->events }; + + req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & poll->events; + } + + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { + add_wait_queue(poll->head, &poll->wait); + return true; + } + + return false; +} + static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb) { struct io_kiocb *req = container_of(cb, struct io_kiocb, task_work); @@ -4164,14 +4184,16 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb) trace_io_uring_task_run(req->ctx, req->opcode, req->user_data); - WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&req->apoll->poll.wait.entry)); - - if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node)) { - spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); - hash_del(&req->hash_node); + if (io_poll_rewait(req, &apoll->poll)) { spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + return; } + if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node)) + hash_del(&req->hash_node); + + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); + /* restore ->work in case we need to retry again */ memcpy(&req->work, &apoll->work, sizeof(req->work)); @@ -4436,18 +4458,11 @@ static void io_poll_task_handler(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_kiocb **nxt) struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx; struct io_poll_iocb *poll = &req->poll; - if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { - struct poll_table_struct pt = { ._key = poll->events }; - - req->result = vfs_poll(req->file, &pt) & poll->events; - } - - spin_lock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); - if (!req->result && !READ_ONCE(poll->canceled)) { - add_wait_queue(poll->head, &poll->wait); + if (io_poll_rewait(req, poll)) { spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock); return; } + hash_del(&req->hash_node); io_poll_complete(req, req->result, 0); req->flags |= REQ_F_COMP_LOCKED; -- 2.26.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-13 17:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2020-04-13 17:21 [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: io_async_task_func() should check and honor cancelation Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCHSET 0/2] io_uring async poll fixes Jens Axboe -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2020-04-13 17:26 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] Jens Axboe 2020-04-13 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: check for need to re-wait in polled async handling Jens Axboe
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.