From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] bus: mhi: core: Add support for data transfer
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:24:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417102420.GR1163@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417101428.GA10295@Mani-XPS-13-9360>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 03:44:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Hemant,
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 08:37:16PM -0700, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 4/7/20 7:33 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 04:55:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > Hello Manivannan Sadhasivam,
> > > >
> > > > The patch 189ff97cca53: "bus: mhi: core: Add support for data
> > > > transfer" from Feb 20, 2020, leads to the following static checker
> > > > warning:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c:1153 mhi_queue_buf()
> > > > error: double locked 'mhi_chan->lock' (orig line 1110)
> > > >
> > > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > > 1142 }
> > > > 1143
> > > > 1144 /* Toggle wake to exit out of M2 */
> > > > 1145 mhi_cntrl->wake_toggle(mhi_cntrl);
> > > > 1146
> > > > 1147 if (mhi_chan->dir = DMA_TO_DEVICE)
> > > > 1148 atomic_inc(&mhi_cntrl->pending_pkts);
> > > > 1149
> > > > 1150 if (likely(MHI_DB_ACCESS_VALID(mhi_cntrl))) {
> > > > 1151 unsigned long flags;
> > > > 1152
> > > > 1153 read_lock_irqsave(&mhi_chan->lock, flags);
> >
> > parse_xfer_event is taking read lock : read_lock_bh(&mhi_chan->lock); first
> > and later
> >
> > mhi_queue_buf takes read lock: read_lock_irqsave(&mhi_chan->lock, flags);
> >
> > Both are read locks which are recursive, is this problematic ?
> >
>
> read_locks are recursive but I wanted to make the static checker happy.
Don't do things just to make the static checker happy.
regards,
dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] bus: mhi: core: Add support for data transfer
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 13:24:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417102420.GR1163@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417101428.GA10295@Mani-XPS-13-9360>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 03:44:28PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Hemant,
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 08:37:16PM -0700, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 4/7/20 7:33 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Hi Dan,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 04:55:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > Hello Manivannan Sadhasivam,
> > > >
> > > > The patch 189ff97cca53: "bus: mhi: core: Add support for data
> > > > transfer" from Feb 20, 2020, leads to the following static checker
> > > > warning:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c:1153 mhi_queue_buf()
> > > > error: double locked 'mhi_chan->lock' (orig line 1110)
> > > >
> > > > drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c
> > > > 1142 }
> > > > 1143
> > > > 1144 /* Toggle wake to exit out of M2 */
> > > > 1145 mhi_cntrl->wake_toggle(mhi_cntrl);
> > > > 1146
> > > > 1147 if (mhi_chan->dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE)
> > > > 1148 atomic_inc(&mhi_cntrl->pending_pkts);
> > > > 1149
> > > > 1150 if (likely(MHI_DB_ACCESS_VALID(mhi_cntrl))) {
> > > > 1151 unsigned long flags;
> > > > 1152
> > > > 1153 read_lock_irqsave(&mhi_chan->lock, flags);
> >
> > parse_xfer_event is taking read lock : read_lock_bh(&mhi_chan->lock); first
> > and later
> >
> > mhi_queue_buf takes read lock: read_lock_irqsave(&mhi_chan->lock, flags);
> >
> > Both are read locks which are recursive, is this problematic ?
> >
>
> read_locks are recursive but I wanted to make the static checker happy.
Don't do things just to make the static checker happy.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-07 13:55 [bug report] bus: mhi: core: Add support for data transfer Dan Carpenter
2020-04-07 13:55 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-04-07 13:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-04-07 13:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-04-07 14:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-07 14:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-07 14:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-07 14:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-17 3:37 ` Hemant Kumar
2020-04-17 3:37 ` Hemant Kumar
2020-04-17 10:14 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-17 10:26 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-17 10:24 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-04-17 10:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-04-18 7:10 ` Hemant Kumar
2020-04-18 7:10 ` Hemant Kumar
2020-04-18 19:19 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-18 19:31 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-20 22:57 ` Hemant Kumar
2020-04-20 22:57 ` Hemant Kumar
2020-04-21 5:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-21 5:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-21 6:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-04-21 6:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200417102420.GR1163@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.