From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:01:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421190148.GA26071@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421184941.GD23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:49:41PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > spin_lock(&ctx->csa.register_lock);
> > - ret = __spufs_proxydma_info_read(ctx, buf, len, pos);
> > + __spufs_proxydma_info_read(ctx, &info);
> > + ret = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, len, pos, &info, sizeof(info));
>
> IDGI... What's that access_ok() for? If you are using simple_read_from_buffer(),
> the damn thing goes through copy_to_user(). Why bother with separate access_ok()
> here?
I have no idea at all, this just refactors the code.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:01:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421190148.GA26071@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421184941.GD23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:49:41PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > spin_lock(&ctx->csa.register_lock);
> > - ret = __spufs_proxydma_info_read(ctx, buf, len, pos);
> > + __spufs_proxydma_info_read(ctx, &info);
> > + ret = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, len, pos, &info, sizeof(info));
>
> IDGI... What's that access_ok() for? If you are using simple_read_from_buffer(),
> the damn thing goes through copy_to_user(). Why bother with separate access_ok()
> here?
I have no idea at all, this just refactors the code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 15:41 remove set_fs calls from the exec and coredump code v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] powerpc/spufs: simplify spufs core dumping Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 18:49 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 18:49 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 19:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-04-21 19:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 19:19 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 19:19 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 19:25 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 19:25 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] signal: factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from copy_siginfo_to_user32 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 4:47 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-26 4:47 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-26 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-27 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-27 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-28 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-28 7:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-28 7:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 7:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-28 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-28 19:56 ` [PATCH] fixup! " Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-28 19:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 6:17 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-29 6:17 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-29 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 6:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 8:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 8:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 11:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 11:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 11:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 11:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-29 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 12:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-21 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] binfmt_elf: femove the set_fs in fill_siginfo_note Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] binfmt_elf: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_core_dump Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] binfmt_elf_fdpic: remove the set_fs(KERNEL_DS) in elf_fdpic_core_dump Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] exec: simplify the copy_strings_kernel calling convention Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] exec: open code copy_string_kernel Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 15:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200421190148.GA26071@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.