From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/23] fs: Allow copy_mount_options() to access user-space in a single pass
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:56:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427165641.GC15808@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421142603.3894-21-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:26:00PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The copy_mount_options() function takes a user pointer argument but not
> a size. It tries to read up to a PAGE_SIZE. However, copy_from_user() is
> not guaranteed to return all the accessible bytes if, for example, the
> access crosses a page boundary and gets a fault on the second page. To
> work around this, the current copy_mount_options() implementations
> performs to copy_from_user() passes, first to the end of the current
> page and the second to what's left in the subsequent page.
>
> Some architectures like arm64 can guarantee an exact copy_from_user()
> depending on the size (since the arch function performs some alignment
> on the source register). Introduce an arch_has_exact_copy_from_user()
> function and allow copy_mount_options() to perform the user access in a
> single pass.
>
> While this function is not on a critical path, the single-pass behaviour
> is required for arm64 MTE (memory tagging) support where a uaccess can
> trigger intra-page faults (tag not matching). With the current
> implementation, if this happens during the first page, the function will
> return -EFAULT.
Do you know how much extra overhead we'd incur if we read at must one
tag granule at a time, instead of PAGE_SIZE?
I'm guessing that in practice strcpy_from_user() type operations copy
much less than a page most of the time, so what we lose in uaccess
overheads we _might_ regain in less redundant copying.
Would need behchmarking though.
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/23] fs: Allow copy_mount_options() to access user-space in a single pass
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:56:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427165641.GC15808@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421142603.3894-21-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:26:00PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The copy_mount_options() function takes a user pointer argument but not
> a size. It tries to read up to a PAGE_SIZE. However, copy_from_user() is
> not guaranteed to return all the accessible bytes if, for example, the
> access crosses a page boundary and gets a fault on the second page. To
> work around this, the current copy_mount_options() implementations
> performs to copy_from_user() passes, first to the end of the current
> page and the second to what's left in the subsequent page.
>
> Some architectures like arm64 can guarantee an exact copy_from_user()
> depending on the size (since the arch function performs some alignment
> on the source register). Introduce an arch_has_exact_copy_from_user()
> function and allow copy_mount_options() to perform the user access in a
> single pass.
>
> While this function is not on a critical path, the single-pass behaviour
> is required for arm64 MTE (memory tagging) support where a uaccess can
> trigger intra-page faults (tag not matching). With the current
> implementation, if this happens during the first page, the function will
> return -EFAULT.
Do you know how much extra overhead we'd incur if we read at must one
tag granule at a time, instead of PAGE_SIZE?
I'm guessing that in practice strcpy_from_user() type operations copy
much less than a page most of the time, so what we lose in uaccess
overheads we _might_ regain in less redundant copying.
Would need behchmarking though.
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 165+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 14:25 [PATCH v3 00/23] arm64: Memory Tagging Extension user-space support Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] arm64: alternative: Allow alternative_insn to always issue the first instruction Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-27 16:57 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-27 16:57 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-28 11:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-28 11:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 10:26 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 10:26 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 14:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-04 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-04 14:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] arm64: mte: system register definitions Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] arm64: mte: CPU feature detection and initial sysreg configuration Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] arm64: mte: Use Normal Tagged attributes for the linear map Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] arm64: mte: Assembler macros and default architecture for .S files Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] arm64: mte: Tags-aware clear_page() implementation Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] arm64: mte: Tags-aware copy_page() implementation Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] arm64: Tags-aware memcmp_pages() implementation Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] arm64: mte: Add specific SIGSEGV codes Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] arm64: mte: Handle synchronous and asynchronous tag check faults Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-23 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-23 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-27 16:58 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-27 16:58 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-28 13:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-28 13:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 10:26 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 10:26 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] mm: Introduce arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] arm64: mte: Add PROT_MTE support to mmap() and mprotect() Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] mm: Introduce arch_validate_flags() Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] arm64: mte: Validate the PROT_MTE request via arch_validate_flags() Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] mm: Allow arm64 mmap(PROT_MTE) on RAM-based files Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] arm64: mte: Allow user control of the tag check mode via prctl() Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] arm64: mte: Allow user control of the generated random tags " Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] arm64: mte: Restore the GCR_EL1 register after a suspend Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-23 15:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-04-23 15:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-04-21 14:25 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] arm64: mte: Add PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}MTETAGS support Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-24 23:28 ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-04-24 23:28 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] arm64: mte: Add PTRACE_{PEEK, POKE}MTETAGS support Peter Collingbourne
2020-04-29 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] arm64: mte: Add PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}MTETAGS support Kevin Brodsky
2020-04-29 10:27 ` Kevin Brodsky
2020-04-29 15:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 15:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 16:46 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 16:46 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-30 10:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-30 10:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-04 16:40 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-04 16:40 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-05 18:03 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-05 18:03 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-12 19:05 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-12 19:05 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-13 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-13 10:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-13 12:52 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-13 12:52 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-13 14:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-13 14:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-13 15:09 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-13 15:09 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-13 16:45 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-13 16:45 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-13 17:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-13 17:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-18 16:47 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-18 16:47 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-18 17:12 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-18 17:12 ` Luis Machado
2020-05-19 16:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-19 16:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] fs: Allow copy_mount_options() to access user-space in a single pass Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 15:29 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 15:29 ` Al Viro
2020-04-21 16:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 16:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-27 16:56 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2020-04-27 16:56 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-28 14:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-28 14:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 10:28 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 10:28 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-28 18:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2020-04-28 18:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2020-04-28 19:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-28 19:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 11:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 11:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-28 19:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-28 19:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 10:26 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 10:26 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-04 16:40 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-04 16:40 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] arm64: mte: Check the DT memory nodes for MTE support Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-24 13:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-24 13:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-24 16:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-24 16:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-27 11:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-27 11:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] arm64: mte: Kconfig entry Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:26 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] arm64: mte: Add Memory Tagging Extension documentation Catalin Marinas
2020-04-21 14:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-29 16:47 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-29 16:47 ` Dave Martin
2020-04-30 16:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-04-30 16:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-04 16:46 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-04 16:46 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-11 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-11 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-13 15:48 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-13 15:48 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-14 11:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-14 11:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-15 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-15 10:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-15 11:14 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-15 11:14 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-15 11:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-15 11:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-15 12:04 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-15 12:04 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-15 12:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-15 12:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-15 12:53 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-15 12:53 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-18 16:52 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-18 16:52 ` Dave Martin
2020-05-18 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-18 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-05 10:32 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-05 10:32 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2020-05-05 17:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-05-05 17:30 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200427165641.GC15808@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.