All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Fix HDCP failures when SRM fw is missing
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 19:20:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429135037.GF22816@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414190258.38873-1-sean@poorly.run>

On 2020-04-14 at 15:02:55 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> 
> The SRM cleanup in 79643fddd6eb2 ("drm/hdcp: optimizing the srm
> handling") inadvertently altered the behavior of HDCP auth when
> the SRM firmware is missing. Before that patch, missing SRM was
> interpreted as the device having no revoked keys. With that patch,
> if the SRM fw file is missing we reject _all_ keys.
> 
> This patch fixes that regression by returning success if the file
> cannot be found. It also checks the return value from request_srm such
> that we won't end up trying to parse the ksv list if there is an error
> fetching it.
> 
> Fixes: 79643fddd6eb ("drm/hdcp: optimizing the srm handling")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> 
> Changes in v2:
> -Noticed a couple other things to clean up
> ---
> 
> Sorry for the quick rev, noticed a couple other loose ends that should
> be cleaned up.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> index 7f386adcf872..910108ccaae1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> @@ -241,8 +241,12 @@ static int drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>  
>  	ret = request_firmware_direct(&fw, (const char *)fw_name,
>  				      drm_dev->dev);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		*revoked_ksv_cnt = 0;
> +		*revoked_ksv_list = NULL;
These two variables are already initialized by the caller.
> +		ret = 0;
Missing of this should have been caught by CI. May be CI system always
having the SRM file from previous execution. Never been removed. IGT
need a fix to clean the prior SRM files before execution.

CI fix shouldn't block this fix.
>  		goto exit;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (fw->size && fw->data)
>  		ret = drm_hdcp_srm_update(fw->data, fw->size, revoked_ksv_list,
> @@ -287,6 +291,8 @@ int drm_hdcp_check_ksvs_revoked(struct drm_device *drm_dev, u8 *ksvs,
>  
>  	ret = drm_hdcp_request_srm(drm_dev, &revoked_ksv_list,
>  				   &revoked_ksv_cnt);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
This error code also shouldn't effect the caller(i915) hence pushed a
change https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/76730/

With these addresed.

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
>  
>  	/* revoked_ksv_cnt will be zero when above function failed */
>  	for (i = 0; i < revoked_ksv_cnt; i++)
> -- 
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm: Fix HDCP failures when SRM fw is missing
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 19:20:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429135037.GF22816@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414190258.38873-1-sean@poorly.run>

On 2020-04-14 at 15:02:55 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> 
> The SRM cleanup in 79643fddd6eb2 ("drm/hdcp: optimizing the srm
> handling") inadvertently altered the behavior of HDCP auth when
> the SRM firmware is missing. Before that patch, missing SRM was
> interpreted as the device having no revoked keys. With that patch,
> if the SRM fw file is missing we reject _all_ keys.
> 
> This patch fixes that regression by returning success if the file
> cannot be found. It also checks the return value from request_srm such
> that we won't end up trying to parse the ksv list if there is an error
> fetching it.
> 
> Fixes: 79643fddd6eb ("drm/hdcp: optimizing the srm handling")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> 
> Changes in v2:
> -Noticed a couple other things to clean up
> ---
> 
> Sorry for the quick rev, noticed a couple other loose ends that should
> be cleaned up.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> index 7f386adcf872..910108ccaae1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> @@ -241,8 +241,12 @@ static int drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>  
>  	ret = request_firmware_direct(&fw, (const char *)fw_name,
>  				      drm_dev->dev);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		*revoked_ksv_cnt = 0;
> +		*revoked_ksv_list = NULL;
These two variables are already initialized by the caller.
> +		ret = 0;
Missing of this should have been caught by CI. May be CI system always
having the SRM file from previous execution. Never been removed. IGT
need a fix to clean the prior SRM files before execution.

CI fix shouldn't block this fix.
>  		goto exit;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (fw->size && fw->data)
>  		ret = drm_hdcp_srm_update(fw->data, fw->size, revoked_ksv_list,
> @@ -287,6 +291,8 @@ int drm_hdcp_check_ksvs_revoked(struct drm_device *drm_dev, u8 *ksvs,
>  
>  	ret = drm_hdcp_request_srm(drm_dev, &revoked_ksv_list,
>  				   &revoked_ksv_cnt);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
This error code also shouldn't effect the caller(i915) hence pushed a
change https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/76730/

With these addresed.

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
>  
>  	/* revoked_ksv_cnt will be zero when above function failed */
>  	for (i = 0; i < revoked_ksv_cnt; i++)
> -- 
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Fix HDCP failures when SRM fw is missing
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 19:20:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429135037.GF22816@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414190258.38873-1-sean@poorly.run>

On 2020-04-14 at 15:02:55 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> 
> The SRM cleanup in 79643fddd6eb2 ("drm/hdcp: optimizing the srm
> handling") inadvertently altered the behavior of HDCP auth when
> the SRM firmware is missing. Before that patch, missing SRM was
> interpreted as the device having no revoked keys. With that patch,
> if the SRM fw file is missing we reject _all_ keys.
> 
> This patch fixes that regression by returning success if the file
> cannot be found. It also checks the return value from request_srm such
> that we won't end up trying to parse the ksv list if there is an error
> fetching it.
> 
> Fixes: 79643fddd6eb ("drm/hdcp: optimizing the srm handling")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> 
> Changes in v2:
> -Noticed a couple other things to clean up
> ---
> 
> Sorry for the quick rev, noticed a couple other loose ends that should
> be cleaned up.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> index 7f386adcf872..910108ccaae1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> @@ -241,8 +241,12 @@ static int drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>  
>  	ret = request_firmware_direct(&fw, (const char *)fw_name,
>  				      drm_dev->dev);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		*revoked_ksv_cnt = 0;
> +		*revoked_ksv_list = NULL;
These two variables are already initialized by the caller.
> +		ret = 0;
Missing of this should have been caught by CI. May be CI system always
having the SRM file from previous execution. Never been removed. IGT
need a fix to clean the prior SRM files before execution.

CI fix shouldn't block this fix.
>  		goto exit;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (fw->size && fw->data)
>  		ret = drm_hdcp_srm_update(fw->data, fw->size, revoked_ksv_list,
> @@ -287,6 +291,8 @@ int drm_hdcp_check_ksvs_revoked(struct drm_device *drm_dev, u8 *ksvs,
>  
>  	ret = drm_hdcp_request_srm(drm_dev, &revoked_ksv_list,
>  				   &revoked_ksv_cnt);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
This error code also shouldn't effect the caller(i915) hence pushed a
change https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/76730/

With these addresed.

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
>  
>  	/* revoked_ksv_cnt will be zero when above function failed */
>  	for (i = 0; i < revoked_ksv_cnt; i++)
> -- 
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14 18:48 [PATCH] drm: Fix HDCP failures when SRM fw is missing Sean Paul
2020-04-14 18:48 ` Sean Paul
2020-04-14 18:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2020-04-14 19:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Sean Paul
2020-04-14 19:02   ` Sean Paul
2020-04-14 19:02   ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2020-04-29 13:50   ` Ramalingam C [this message]
2020-04-29 13:50     ` Ramalingam C
2020-04-29 13:50     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2020-04-29 13:58     ` Sean Paul
2020-04-29 13:58       ` Sean Paul
2020-04-29 13:58       ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2020-04-29 14:22       ` Ramalingam C
2020-04-29 14:22         ` Ramalingam C
2020-04-29 14:22         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2020-04-29 14:46         ` Sean Paul
2020-04-29 14:46           ` Sean Paul
2020-04-29 14:46           ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2020-04-29 16:20           ` Ramalingam C
2020-04-29 16:20             ` Ramalingam C
2020-04-29 16:20             ` [Intel-gfx] " Ramalingam C
2020-05-05 18:02             ` Sean Paul
2020-05-05 18:02               ` Sean Paul
2020-05-05 18:02               ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2020-04-15  1:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm: Fix HDCP failures when SRM fw is missing (rev2) Patchwork
2020-04-15  1:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-04-15  1:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200429135037.GF22816@intel.com \
    --to=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.