From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com,
loic.pallardy@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:58:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200430205819.GD18004@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b68419a6-65a9-08d0-bed8-5f8195ae3d55@st.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:37:58PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On 4/24/20 10:24 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the device tree
> > since (1) there is no correlation between them and (2) to use the
> > information that was gathered to make a decision on whether to
> > synchronise with the M4 or not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > index 1ac90adba9b1..57a426ea620b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > @@ -538,12 +538,11 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_syscon(struct device_node *np, const char *prop,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata, bool *auto_boot)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > - struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > - struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> > struct stm32_syscon tz;
> > unsigned int tzen;
> > int err, irq;
> > @@ -589,7 +588,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > err = regmap_read(tz.map, tz.reg, &tzen);
> > if (err) {
> > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
> > return err;
> > }
> > ddata->secured_soc = tzen & tz.mask;
> > @@ -605,7 +604,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (err)
> > dev_info(dev, "failed to get pdds\n");
> >
> > - rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
> > + *auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
> >
> > return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
> > }
> > @@ -616,6 +615,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
> > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > struct rproc *rproc;
> > + bool auto_boot = false;
>
> Nitpicking: Seems that you don't need to initialize it.
I think you are correct.
> Perhaps you can simply suppress the local variable and directly use rproc->auto_boot.
... and change the value of rproc->auto_boot if state == M4_STATE_CRUN? Sure,
that's possible.
Thanks for all the comments, it really helps to have a different perspective. I
am out of time for today but will continue with the rest of your comments
tomorrow.
Mathieu
>
> else LGTM
>
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > @@ -626,9 +626,16 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (!rproc)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + ddata = rproc->priv;
> > +
> > rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
> > +
> > + ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &auto_boot);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_rproc;
> > +
> > + rproc->auto_boot = auto_boot;
> > rproc->has_iommu = false;
> > - ddata = rproc->priv;
> > ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
> > if (!ddata->workqueue) {
> > dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
> > @@ -638,13 +645,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
> >
> > - ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto free_wkq;
> > -
> > ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto free_rproc;
> > + goto free_wkq;
> >
> > ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> > if (ret)
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, loic.pallardy@st.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:58:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200430205819.GD18004@xps15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b68419a6-65a9-08d0-bed8-5f8195ae3d55@st.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:37:58PM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On 4/24/20 10:24 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the device tree
> > since (1) there is no correlation between them and (2) to use the
> > information that was gathered to make a decision on whether to
> > synchronise with the M4 or not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > index 1ac90adba9b1..57a426ea620b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> > @@ -538,12 +538,11 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_syscon(struct device_node *np, const char *prop,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata, bool *auto_boot)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > - struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > - struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> > struct stm32_syscon tz;
> > unsigned int tzen;
> > int err, irq;
> > @@ -589,7 +588,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > err = regmap_read(tz.map, tz.reg, &tzen);
> > if (err) {
> > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
> > return err;
> > }
> > ddata->secured_soc = tzen & tz.mask;
> > @@ -605,7 +604,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (err)
> > dev_info(dev, "failed to get pdds\n");
> >
> > - rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
> > + *auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
> >
> > return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
> > }
> > @@ -616,6 +615,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
> > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > struct rproc *rproc;
> > + bool auto_boot = false;
>
> Nitpicking: Seems that you don't need to initialize it.
I think you are correct.
> Perhaps you can simply suppress the local variable and directly use rproc->auto_boot.
... and change the value of rproc->auto_boot if state == M4_STATE_CRUN? Sure,
that's possible.
Thanks for all the comments, it really helps to have a different perspective. I
am out of time for today but will continue with the rest of your comments
tomorrow.
Mathieu
>
> else LGTM
>
>
> Thanks,
> Arnaud
>
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > @@ -626,9 +626,16 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (!rproc)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + ddata = rproc->priv;
> > +
> > rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
> > +
> > + ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &auto_boot);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_rproc;
> > +
> > + rproc->auto_boot = auto_boot;
> > rproc->has_iommu = false;
> > - ddata = rproc->priv;
> > ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
> > if (!ddata->workqueue) {
> > dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
> > @@ -638,13 +645,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
> >
> > - ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto free_wkq;
> > -
> > ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto free_rproc;
> > + goto free_wkq;
> >
> > ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> > if (ret)
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-30 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 20:24 [PATCH v2 00/12] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for synchronising with M4 Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 13:37 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-29 13:37 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-30 20:58 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2020-04-30 20:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-14 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation " Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] remoteproc: stm32: Get coprocessor state Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 13:38 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-29 13:38 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-05-01 17:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-01 17:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] remoteproc: stm32: Get loaded resource table for synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new start ops " Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 14:50 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-29 14:50 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 14:52 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-29 14:52 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new parse fw ops for synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-14 5:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new loaded rsc " Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-14 5:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] remoteproc: stm32: Set synchronisation state machine if needed Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 14:47 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-29 14:47 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-05-01 17:54 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-01 17:54 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for synchronising with M4 Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-29 15:08 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-05-01 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-01 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200430205819.GD18004@xps15 \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.