From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nvme-pci: reshuffle nvme_queue members
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 14:57:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501125704.GC5197@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427235243.2268765-3-kbusch@kernel.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:52:43PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> All the io path hot members can fit within the first 64-bytes, which is
> a common cacheline. Order the members of this struct so those members
> fit in and align to that window.
Do we even want to share a cacheline for the submission vs completion
path? I know other places try to keep the deliberately separate.
> + /* only used for poll queues: */
> + spinlock_t cq_poll_lock;
> + dma_addr_t sq_dma_addr;
> + dma_addr_t cq_dma_addr;
> struct completion delete_done;
We probably want a comment before the last three that this is only
used during queue deletion. Also cq_poll_lock very much is in the
hot path for polled I/O, so I'd rather keep it with other CQ bits.
_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-01 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-27 23:52 [PATCH 1/3] nvme-pci: clear shadow doorbell memory on resets Keith Busch
2020-04-27 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: remove cached shadow doorbell offsets Keith Busch
2020-04-30 6:36 ` Dongli Zhang
2020-04-30 19:07 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-01 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-04 9:42 ` John Levon
2020-04-27 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-pci: reshuffle nvme_queue members Keith Busch
2020-05-01 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-05-01 15:08 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-01 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-01 15:23 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-04 18:18 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-01 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-pci: clear shadow doorbell memory on resets Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-04 9:35 ` John Levon
2021-10-06 12:07 ` Keith Busch
2021-10-06 16:05 ` John Levon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200501125704.GC5197@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.