From: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com,
michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] gpio: xilinx: Utilize for_each_set_clump macro
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 04:55:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200502232512.GA31703@syed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200502190354.GA6513@shinobu>
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 03:03:54PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 12:21:54AM +0530, Syed Nayyar Waris wrote:
> > This patch reimplements the xgpio_set_multiple function in
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c to use the new for_each_set_clump macro.
> > Instead of looping for each bit in xgpio_set_multiple
> > function, now we can check each channel at a time and save cycles.
> >
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Minor change: Hardcode value for better code readability.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - No change.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - No change.
> >
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> > index 67f9f82e0db0..67c5eeaf1bb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> > @@ -136,39 +136,43 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> > static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
> > unsigned long *bits)
> > {
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > + unsigned long flags[2];
> > struct xgpio_instance *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > - int index = xgpio_index(chip, 0);
> > - int offset, i;
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > -
> > - /* Write to GPIO signals */
> > - for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
> > - if (*mask == 0)
> > - break;
> > - /* Once finished with an index write it out to the register */
> > - if (index != xgpio_index(chip, i)) {
> > - xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
> > - index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET,
> > - chip->gpio_state[index]);
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > - index = xgpio_index(chip, i);
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > - }
> > - if (__test_and_clear_bit(i, mask)) {
> > - offset = xgpio_offset(chip, i);
> > - if (test_bit(i, bits))
> > - chip->gpio_state[index] |= BIT(offset);
> > - else
> > - chip->gpio_state[index] &= ~BIT(offset);
> > - }
> > + u32 *const state = chip->gpio_state;
> > + unsigned int *const width = chip->gpio_width;
> > + const unsigned long state_size = 32;
> > + const unsigned long total_state_bits = state_size * 2;
>
> Hello Syed,
>
> I don't think there's much need for these two variables either. You can
> remove the state_size and total_state_bits variables, and instead inline
> 32 and 64 directly in your code below.
Hi. Have sent v5 patchset incorporating your review comment.
Thank you.
>
> William Breathitt Gray
>
> > + unsigned long offset, clump;
> > + size_t index;
> > +
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(old, 64);
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(new, 64);
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(changed, 64);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flags[0]);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[1], flags[1]);
> > +
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[0], 0, width[0]);
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[1], width[0], width[1]);
> > + bitmap_replace(new, old, bits, mask, gc->ngpio);
> > +
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[0], 0, state_size);
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[1], state_size, state_size);
> > + state[0] = bitmap_get_value(new, 0, width[0]);
> > + state[1] = bitmap_get_value(new, width[0], width[1]);
> > + bitmap_set_value(new, state[0], 0, state_size);
> > + bitmap_set_value(new, state[1], state_size, state_size);
> > + bitmap_xor(changed, old, new, total_state_bits);
> > +
> > + for_each_set_clump(offset, clump, changed, total_state_bits, state_size) {
> > + index = offset / state_size;
> > + xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
> > + index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET,
> > + state[index]);
> > }
> >
> > - xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
> > - index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]);
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[1], flags[1]);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flags[0]);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
michal.simek@xilinx.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] gpio: xilinx: Utilize for_each_set_clump macro
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 04:55:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200502232512.GA31703@syed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200502190354.GA6513@shinobu>
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 03:03:54PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 12:21:54AM +0530, Syed Nayyar Waris wrote:
> > This patch reimplements the xgpio_set_multiple function in
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c to use the new for_each_set_clump macro.
> > Instead of looping for each bit in xgpio_set_multiple
> > function, now we can check each channel at a time and save cycles.
> >
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Minor change: Hardcode value for better code readability.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - No change.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - No change.
> >
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> > index 67f9f82e0db0..67c5eeaf1bb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> > @@ -136,39 +136,43 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
> > static void xgpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned long *mask,
> > unsigned long *bits)
> > {
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > + unsigned long flags[2];
> > struct xgpio_instance *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > - int index = xgpio_index(chip, 0);
> > - int offset, i;
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > -
> > - /* Write to GPIO signals */
> > - for (i = 0; i < gc->ngpio; i++) {
> > - if (*mask == 0)
> > - break;
> > - /* Once finished with an index write it out to the register */
> > - if (index != xgpio_index(chip, i)) {
> > - xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
> > - index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET,
> > - chip->gpio_state[index]);
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > - index = xgpio_index(chip, i);
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > - }
> > - if (__test_and_clear_bit(i, mask)) {
> > - offset = xgpio_offset(chip, i);
> > - if (test_bit(i, bits))
> > - chip->gpio_state[index] |= BIT(offset);
> > - else
> > - chip->gpio_state[index] &= ~BIT(offset);
> > - }
> > + u32 *const state = chip->gpio_state;
> > + unsigned int *const width = chip->gpio_width;
> > + const unsigned long state_size = 32;
> > + const unsigned long total_state_bits = state_size * 2;
>
> Hello Syed,
>
> I don't think there's much need for these two variables either. You can
> remove the state_size and total_state_bits variables, and instead inline
> 32 and 64 directly in your code below.
Hi. Have sent v5 patchset incorporating your review comment.
Thank you.
>
> William Breathitt Gray
>
> > + unsigned long offset, clump;
> > + size_t index;
> > +
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(old, 64);
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(new, 64);
> > + DECLARE_BITMAP(changed, 64);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flags[0]);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock[1], flags[1]);
> > +
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[0], 0, width[0]);
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[1], width[0], width[1]);
> > + bitmap_replace(new, old, bits, mask, gc->ngpio);
> > +
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[0], 0, state_size);
> > + bitmap_set_value(old, state[1], state_size, state_size);
> > + state[0] = bitmap_get_value(new, 0, width[0]);
> > + state[1] = bitmap_get_value(new, width[0], width[1]);
> > + bitmap_set_value(new, state[0], 0, state_size);
> > + bitmap_set_value(new, state[1], state_size, state_size);
> > + bitmap_xor(changed, old, new, total_state_bits);
> > +
> > + for_each_set_clump(offset, clump, changed, total_state_bits, state_size) {
> > + index = offset / state_size;
> > + xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
> > + index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET,
> > + state[index]);
> > }
> >
> > - xgpio_writereg(chip->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET +
> > - index * XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state[index]);
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[index], flags);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[1], flags[1]);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock[0], flags[0]);
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-02 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-02 18:46 [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-05-02 18:46 ` Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-05-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] bitops: Introduce the " Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-05-02 18:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] lib/test_bitmap.c: Add for_each_set_clump test cases Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-05-02 18:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] gpio: thunderx: Utilize for_each_set_clump macro Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-05-02 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] gpio: xilinx: " Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-05-02 18:51 ` Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-05-02 19:03 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-05-02 19:03 ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-05-02 23:25 ` Syed Nayyar Waris [this message]
2020-05-02 23:25 ` Syed Nayyar Waris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200502232512.GA31703@syed \
--to=syednwaris@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.