From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] pty04: Fix build for kernel headers < v4.2-rc1
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 18:01:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200506160159.GA23110@dell5510> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506155616.GE11352@yuki.lan>
> Hi!
> > The struct added in 6b6b56cf3 ("pty04: Add SLCAN ldisc and check for CVE-2020-11494") uses
> > uint32_t, kernel version always used __u8. Richie, any reason to use uint32_t
> > instead of uint8_t? I does not fixes the problem, I'm just asking, whether
> > different size affect test coverage.
> > struct can_frame {
> > canid_t can_id;
> > uint32_t can_dlc;
> > uint32_t __pad;
> > uint32_t __res0;
> > uint32_t __res1;
> > uint32_t data[CAN_MAX_DLEN] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> > };
> > struct can_frame {
> > canid_t can_id; /* 32 bit CAN_ID + EFF/RTR/ERR flags */
> > __u8 can_dlc; /* frame payload length in byte (0 .. CAN_MAX_DLEN) */
> > __u8 __pad; /* padding */
> > __u8 __res0; /* reserved / padding */
> > __u8 __res1; /* reserved / padding */
> > __u8 data[CAN_MAX_DLEN] __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> > };
> These two structures are for sure incompatible, that should be uint8_t
> instead uint32_t.
OK I'll fix it.
I also add #define CAN_MTU (sizeof(struct can_frame)), instead of 16 (which
is now correct, but for uint32_t should be 56).
Kind regards,
Petr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-06 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 13:48 [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] pty04: Fix build for kernel headers < v4.2-rc1 Petr Vorel
2020-05-06 13:55 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-05-06 14:00 ` Jan Stancek
2020-05-06 14:14 ` Petr Vorel
2020-05-06 14:45 ` Petr Vorel
2020-05-06 15:47 ` Petr Vorel
2020-05-06 15:56 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-05-06 16:01 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200506160159.GA23110@dell5510 \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.