From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 13:52:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507185205.GA14139@embeddedor> (raw)
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h | 6 +++---
fs/dlm/user.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
index 416d9de35679..d231ae5d2c65 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ struct dlm_message {
int m_bastmode;
int m_asts;
int m_result; /* 0 or -EXXX */
- char m_extra[0]; /* name or lvb */
+ char m_extra[]; /* name or lvb */
};
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ struct dlm_rcom {
uint64_t rc_id; /* match reply with request */
uint64_t rc_seq; /* sender's ls_recover_seq */
uint64_t rc_seq_reply; /* remote ls_recover_seq */
- char rc_buf[0];
+ char rc_buf[];
};
union dlm_packet {
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ struct rcom_lock {
__le16 rl_wait_type;
__le16 rl_namelen;
char rl_name[DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN];
- char rl_lvb[0];
+ char rl_lvb[];
};
/*
diff --git a/fs/dlm/user.c b/fs/dlm/user.c
index 5264bac75115..e5cefa90b1ce 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/user.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/user.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct dlm_lock_params32 {
__u32 bastaddr;
__u32 lksb;
char lvb[DLM_USER_LVB_LEN];
- char name[0];
+ char name[];
};
struct dlm_write_request32 {
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
To: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dlm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 13:52:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507185205.GA14139@embeddedor> (raw)
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h | 6 +++---
fs/dlm/user.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
index 416d9de35679..d231ae5d2c65 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
+++ b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ struct dlm_message {
int m_bastmode;
int m_asts;
int m_result; /* 0 or -EXXX */
- char m_extra[0]; /* name or lvb */
+ char m_extra[]; /* name or lvb */
};
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ struct dlm_rcom {
uint64_t rc_id; /* match reply with request */
uint64_t rc_seq; /* sender's ls_recover_seq */
uint64_t rc_seq_reply; /* remote ls_recover_seq */
- char rc_buf[0];
+ char rc_buf[];
};
union dlm_packet {
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ struct rcom_lock {
__le16 rl_wait_type;
__le16 rl_namelen;
char rl_name[DLM_RESNAME_MAXLEN];
- char rl_lvb[0];
+ char rl_lvb[];
};
/*
diff --git a/fs/dlm/user.c b/fs/dlm/user.c
index 5264bac75115..e5cefa90b1ce 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/user.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/user.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct dlm_lock_params32 {
__u32 bastaddr;
__u32 lksb;
char lvb[DLM_USER_LVB_LEN];
- char name[0];
+ char name[];
};
struct dlm_write_request32 {
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-07 18:52 Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2020-05-07 18:52 ` [PATCH] dlm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200507185205.GA14139@embeddedor \
--to=gustavoars@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.