From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add Allwinner H6 IOMMU driver
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:53:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513095304.GK9820@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcccd40c46982b6ab2fc1c5bc199d045798fbe8e.1588673353.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech>
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:09:32PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> +static u32 *sun50i_dte_get_page_table(struct sun50i_iommu_domain *sun50i_domain,
> + dma_addr_t iova, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu = sun50i_domain->iommu;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 *page_table;
> + u32 *dte_addr;
> + u32 old_dte;
> + u32 dte;
> +
> + dte_addr = &sun50i_domain->dt[sun50i_iova_get_dte_index(iova)];
> + dte = *dte_addr;
> + if (sun50i_dte_is_pt_valid(dte)) {
> + phys_addr_t pt_phys = sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(dte);
> + return (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys);
> + }
> +
> + page_table = sun50i_iommu_alloc_page_table(iommu, gfp);
> + if (IS_ERR(page_table))
> + return page_table;
> +
> + dte = sun50i_mk_dte(virt_to_phys(page_table));
> + old_dte = cmpxchg(dte_addr, 0, dte);
> + if (old_dte) {
> + phys_addr_t installed_pt_phys =
> + sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(old_dte);
> + u32 *installed_pt = phys_to_virt(installed_pt_phys);
> + u32 *drop_pt = page_table;
> +
> + page_table = installed_pt;
> + dte = old_dte;
> + sun50i_iommu_free_page_table(iommu, drop_pt);
> + }
> +
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, page_table, PT_SIZE);
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, dte_addr, 1);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->iommu_lock, flags);
> + sun50i_iommu_ptw_invalidate(iommu, iova);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->iommu_lock, flags);
Why is that needed, does the PTW also cache non-present entries?
> +static size_t sun50i_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> + size_t size, struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu_domain *sun50i_domain = to_sun50i_domain(domain);
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu = sun50i_domain->iommu;
> + phys_addr_t pt_phys;
> + dma_addr_t pte_dma;
> + u32 *pte_addr;
> + u32 dte;
> +
> + dte = sun50i_domain->dt[sun50i_iova_get_dte_index(iova)];
> + if (!sun50i_dte_is_pt_valid(dte))
> + return 0;
> +
> + pt_phys = sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(dte);
> + pte_addr = (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys) + sun50i_iova_get_pte_index(iova);
> + pte_dma = pt_phys + sun50i_iova_get_pte_index(iova) * PT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +
> + if (!sun50i_pte_is_page_valid(*pte_addr))
> + return 0;
> +
> + memset(pte_addr, 0, sizeof(*pte_addr));
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, pte_addr, 1);
> +
> + spin_lock(&iommu->iommu_lock);
> + sun50i_iommu_ptw_invalidate(iommu, iova);
> + spin_unlock(&iommu->iommu_lock);
And is that also needed? You clear a PTE here and not a top-level DT
entry. All these spinlocks in the map/unmap paths will truly hurt
performance.
And if it is really needed you can defer it into the iotlb_sync()
call-back.
> +static int sun50i_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu;
> + struct iommu_group *group;
> +
> + iommu = sun50i_iommu_from_dev(dev);
> + if (!iommu)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(group))
> + return PTR_ERR(group);
> +
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void sun50i_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
> +}
These two call-backs have been renamed in the iommu-tree to
probe_device() and release_device() with slightly different semantics
and function signatures. I think for this driver they should look like
this:
static struct iommu_device *sun50i_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct sun50i_iommu *iommu;
iommu = sun50i_iommu_from_dev(dev);
if (!iommu)
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
return &iommu->iommu;
}
static void sun50i_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
{
}
Can you pleas rebase these patches to the 'core' branch of the
iommu-tree and use these new call-backs?
The rest of your driver looks good to me. Good work!
Thanks,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add Allwinner H6 IOMMU driver
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:53:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513095304.GK9820@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcccd40c46982b6ab2fc1c5bc199d045798fbe8e.1588673353.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech>
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:09:32PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> +static u32 *sun50i_dte_get_page_table(struct sun50i_iommu_domain *sun50i_domain,
> + dma_addr_t iova, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu = sun50i_domain->iommu;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 *page_table;
> + u32 *dte_addr;
> + u32 old_dte;
> + u32 dte;
> +
> + dte_addr = &sun50i_domain->dt[sun50i_iova_get_dte_index(iova)];
> + dte = *dte_addr;
> + if (sun50i_dte_is_pt_valid(dte)) {
> + phys_addr_t pt_phys = sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(dte);
> + return (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys);
> + }
> +
> + page_table = sun50i_iommu_alloc_page_table(iommu, gfp);
> + if (IS_ERR(page_table))
> + return page_table;
> +
> + dte = sun50i_mk_dte(virt_to_phys(page_table));
> + old_dte = cmpxchg(dte_addr, 0, dte);
> + if (old_dte) {
> + phys_addr_t installed_pt_phys =
> + sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(old_dte);
> + u32 *installed_pt = phys_to_virt(installed_pt_phys);
> + u32 *drop_pt = page_table;
> +
> + page_table = installed_pt;
> + dte = old_dte;
> + sun50i_iommu_free_page_table(iommu, drop_pt);
> + }
> +
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, page_table, PT_SIZE);
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, dte_addr, 1);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->iommu_lock, flags);
> + sun50i_iommu_ptw_invalidate(iommu, iova);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->iommu_lock, flags);
Why is that needed, does the PTW also cache non-present entries?
> +static size_t sun50i_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> + size_t size, struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu_domain *sun50i_domain = to_sun50i_domain(domain);
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu = sun50i_domain->iommu;
> + phys_addr_t pt_phys;
> + dma_addr_t pte_dma;
> + u32 *pte_addr;
> + u32 dte;
> +
> + dte = sun50i_domain->dt[sun50i_iova_get_dte_index(iova)];
> + if (!sun50i_dte_is_pt_valid(dte))
> + return 0;
> +
> + pt_phys = sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(dte);
> + pte_addr = (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys) + sun50i_iova_get_pte_index(iova);
> + pte_dma = pt_phys + sun50i_iova_get_pte_index(iova) * PT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +
> + if (!sun50i_pte_is_page_valid(*pte_addr))
> + return 0;
> +
> + memset(pte_addr, 0, sizeof(*pte_addr));
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, pte_addr, 1);
> +
> + spin_lock(&iommu->iommu_lock);
> + sun50i_iommu_ptw_invalidate(iommu, iova);
> + spin_unlock(&iommu->iommu_lock);
And is that also needed? You clear a PTE here and not a top-level DT
entry. All these spinlocks in the map/unmap paths will truly hurt
performance.
And if it is really needed you can defer it into the iotlb_sync()
call-back.
> +static int sun50i_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu;
> + struct iommu_group *group;
> +
> + iommu = sun50i_iommu_from_dev(dev);
> + if (!iommu)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(group))
> + return PTR_ERR(group);
> +
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void sun50i_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
> +}
These two call-backs have been renamed in the iommu-tree to
probe_device() and release_device() with slightly different semantics
and function signatures. I think for this driver they should look like
this:
static struct iommu_device *sun50i_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct sun50i_iommu *iommu;
iommu = sun50i_iommu_from_dev(dev);
if (!iommu)
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
return &iommu->iommu;
}
static void sun50i_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
{
}
Can you pleas rebase these patches to the 'core' branch of the
iommu-tree and use these new call-backs?
The rest of your driver looks good to me. Good work!
Thanks,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add Allwinner H6 IOMMU driver
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 11:53:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200513095304.GK9820@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcccd40c46982b6ab2fc1c5bc199d045798fbe8e.1588673353.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech>
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:09:32PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> +static u32 *sun50i_dte_get_page_table(struct sun50i_iommu_domain *sun50i_domain,
> + dma_addr_t iova, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu = sun50i_domain->iommu;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 *page_table;
> + u32 *dte_addr;
> + u32 old_dte;
> + u32 dte;
> +
> + dte_addr = &sun50i_domain->dt[sun50i_iova_get_dte_index(iova)];
> + dte = *dte_addr;
> + if (sun50i_dte_is_pt_valid(dte)) {
> + phys_addr_t pt_phys = sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(dte);
> + return (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys);
> + }
> +
> + page_table = sun50i_iommu_alloc_page_table(iommu, gfp);
> + if (IS_ERR(page_table))
> + return page_table;
> +
> + dte = sun50i_mk_dte(virt_to_phys(page_table));
> + old_dte = cmpxchg(dte_addr, 0, dte);
> + if (old_dte) {
> + phys_addr_t installed_pt_phys =
> + sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(old_dte);
> + u32 *installed_pt = phys_to_virt(installed_pt_phys);
> + u32 *drop_pt = page_table;
> +
> + page_table = installed_pt;
> + dte = old_dte;
> + sun50i_iommu_free_page_table(iommu, drop_pt);
> + }
> +
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, page_table, PT_SIZE);
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, dte_addr, 1);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->iommu_lock, flags);
> + sun50i_iommu_ptw_invalidate(iommu, iova);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->iommu_lock, flags);
Why is that needed, does the PTW also cache non-present entries?
> +static size_t sun50i_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> + size_t size, struct iommu_iotlb_gather *gather)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu_domain *sun50i_domain = to_sun50i_domain(domain);
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu = sun50i_domain->iommu;
> + phys_addr_t pt_phys;
> + dma_addr_t pte_dma;
> + u32 *pte_addr;
> + u32 dte;
> +
> + dte = sun50i_domain->dt[sun50i_iova_get_dte_index(iova)];
> + if (!sun50i_dte_is_pt_valid(dte))
> + return 0;
> +
> + pt_phys = sun50i_dte_get_pt_address(dte);
> + pte_addr = (u32 *)phys_to_virt(pt_phys) + sun50i_iova_get_pte_index(iova);
> + pte_dma = pt_phys + sun50i_iova_get_pte_index(iova) * PT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> +
> + if (!sun50i_pte_is_page_valid(*pte_addr))
> + return 0;
> +
> + memset(pte_addr, 0, sizeof(*pte_addr));
> + sun50i_table_flush(sun50i_domain, pte_addr, 1);
> +
> + spin_lock(&iommu->iommu_lock);
> + sun50i_iommu_ptw_invalidate(iommu, iova);
> + spin_unlock(&iommu->iommu_lock);
And is that also needed? You clear a PTE here and not a top-level DT
entry. All these spinlocks in the map/unmap paths will truly hurt
performance.
And if it is really needed you can defer it into the iotlb_sync()
call-back.
> +static int sun50i_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sun50i_iommu *iommu;
> + struct iommu_group *group;
> +
> + iommu = sun50i_iommu_from_dev(dev);
> + if (!iommu)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + group = iommu_group_get_for_dev(dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(group))
> + return PTR_ERR(group);
> +
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void sun50i_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
> +}
These two call-backs have been renamed in the iommu-tree to
probe_device() and release_device() with slightly different semantics
and function signatures. I think for this driver they should look like
this:
static struct iommu_device *sun50i_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct sun50i_iommu *iommu;
iommu = sun50i_iommu_from_dev(dev);
if (!iommu)
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
return &iommu->iommu;
}
static void sun50i_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
{
}
Can you pleas rebase these patches to the 'core' branch of the
iommu-tree and use these new call-backs?
The rest of your driver looks good to me. Good work!
Thanks,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 10:09 [PATCH v3 0/5] iommu: Add Allwinner H6 IOMMU driver Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: iommu: Add Allwinner H6 IOMMU bindings Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: display: sun8i-mixer: Allow for an iommu property Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-13 2:22 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-13 2:22 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-13 2:22 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add Allwinner H6 IOMMU driver Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-13 9:53 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-05-13 9:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-13 9:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-13 14:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-13 14:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-13 14:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add IOMMU Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/sun4i: mixer: Call of_dma_configure if there's an IOMMU Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-05-05 10:09 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200513095304.GK9820@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.