From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: psci: Fixup execution order when entering a domain idle state
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:42:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515124154.GA1303@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrsfLExZHvNrJgqsJj8TTzj9jg5v=jEowBTdi26uyjZXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:29:27PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 12:23, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:11:50PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > >
> > > No worries, thanks for reviewing.
> > >
> >
> > You are welcome.
> >
> > > That said, are you fine with Rafel queuing this then?
> > >
> >
> > I am fine with that. However I told if you need fixes tags as there are
> > no users of the notification yet in the kernel. Though this is trivial,
> > but do we need this backported to stable kernel. I don't have strong
> > opinion and leave it to you and Rafael.
>
> I wanted to add the fixes tag, to make it obvious that there is an
> error being fixed.
>
> On the other hand, no need to tag this for stable, nor to need to send
> it as fix for 5.7,
>
Sometimes bots pick up patches for stable based on Fixes tag, hence I
thought of mentioning that.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: psci: Fixup execution order when entering a domain idle state
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 13:42:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515124154.GA1303@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrsfLExZHvNrJgqsJj8TTzj9jg5v=jEowBTdi26uyjZXg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:29:27PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 12:23, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 09:11:50PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > >
> > > No worries, thanks for reviewing.
> > >
> >
> > You are welcome.
> >
> > > That said, are you fine with Rafel queuing this then?
> > >
> >
> > I am fine with that. However I told if you need fixes tags as there are
> > no users of the notification yet in the kernel. Though this is trivial,
> > but do we need this backported to stable kernel. I don't have strong
> > opinion and leave it to you and Rafael.
>
> I wanted to add the fixes tag, to make it obvious that there is an
> error being fixed.
>
> On the other hand, no need to tag this for stable, nor to need to send
> it as fix for 5.7,
>
Sometimes bots pick up patches for stable based on Fixes tag, hence I
thought of mentioning that.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-15 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 13:33 [PATCH] cpuidle: psci: Fixup execution order when entering a domain idle state Ulf Hansson
2020-05-11 13:33 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-14 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-14 14:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 14:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 15:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 15:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 17:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 17:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 19:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 19:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-15 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-15 10:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-15 11:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-15 11:29 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-15 12:42 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-05-15 12:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-15 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-15 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200515124154.GA1303@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.