* [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Replace one-element array and use struct_size() helper
@ 2020-05-19 23:30 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-05-19 23:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2020-05-19 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernard Metzler, Doug Ledford, Jason Gunthorpe
Cc: linux-rdma, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva
The current codebase makes use of one-element arrays in the following
form:
struct something {
int length;
u8 data[1];
};
struct something *instance;
instance = kmalloc(sizeof(*instance) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
instance->length = size;
memcpy(instance->data, source, size);
but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as
these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. So, replace
the one-element array with a flexible-array member.
Also, make use of the new struct_size() helper to properly calculate the
size of struct siw_pbl.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and fixed
_manually_.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c | 5 +----
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
index af5e9f8c0fcd0..5a58a1cc7a7e8 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct siw_pble {
struct siw_pbl {
unsigned int num_buf;
unsigned int max_buf;
- struct siw_pble pbe[1];
+ struct siw_pble pbe[];
};
/*
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
index e2061dc0b043c..87117781d6374 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
@@ -349,14 +349,11 @@ dma_addr_t siw_pbl_get_buffer(struct siw_pbl *pbl, u64 off, int *len, int *idx)
struct siw_pbl *siw_pbl_alloc(u32 num_buf)
{
struct siw_pbl *pbl;
- int buf_size = sizeof(*pbl);
if (num_buf == 0)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- buf_size += ((num_buf - 1) * sizeof(struct siw_pble));
-
- pbl = kzalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ pbl = kzalloc(struct_size(pbl, pbe, num_buf), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pbl)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Replace one-element array and use struct_size() helper
2020-05-19 23:30 [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Replace one-element array and use struct_size() helper Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2020-05-19 23:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-20 0:04 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2020-05-19 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Bernard Metzler, Doug Ledford, linux-rdma, linux-kernel,
Gustavo A. R. Silva
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:30:18PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of one-element arrays in the following
> form:
>
> struct something {
> int length;
> u8 data[1];
> };
>
> struct something *instance;
>
> instance = kmalloc(sizeof(*instance) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
> instance->length = size;
> memcpy(instance->data, source, size);
>
> but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as
> these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
>
> struct foo {
> int stuff;
> struct boo array[];
> };
>
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. So, replace
> the one-element array with a flexible-array member.
>
> Also, make use of the new struct_size() helper to properly calculate the
> size of struct siw_pbl.
>
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and, audited and fixed
> _manually_.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h | 2 +-
> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c | 5 +----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied to for-next, thanks
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Replace one-element array and use struct_size() helper
2020-05-19 23:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2020-05-20 0:04 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2020-05-20 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Gunthorpe
Cc: Bernard Metzler, Doug Ledford, linux-rdma, linux-kernel,
Gustavo A. R. Silva
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:52:31PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c | 5 +----
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Applied to for-next, thanks
>
Thanks, Jason.
--
Gustavo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-20 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-19 23:30 [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Replace one-element array and use struct_size() helper Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-05-19 23:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-20 0:04 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.