From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Tom Joseph <tjoseph@cadence.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/14] PCI: cadence: Add support to use custom read and write accessors
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:07:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520220724.GA636352@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506151429.12255-4-kishon@ti.com>
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:44:18PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add support to use custom read and write accessors. Platforms that
> don't support half word or byte access or any other constraint
> while accessing registers can use this feature to populate custom
> read and write accessors. These custom accessors are used for both
> standard register access and configuration space register access of
> the PCIe host bridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h | 107 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Actually, take back my R-by...
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h
> index df14ad002fe9..70b6b25153e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h
> @@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ enum cdns_pcie_msg_routing {
> MSG_ROUTING_GATHER,
> };
>
> +struct cdns_pcie_ops {
> + u32 (*read)(void __iomem *addr, int size);
> + void (*write)(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 value);
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct cdns_pcie - private data for Cadence PCIe controller drivers
> * @reg_base: IO mapped register base
> @@ -239,7 +244,7 @@ struct cdns_pcie {
> int phy_count;
> struct phy **phy;
> struct device_link **link;
> - const struct cdns_pcie_common_ops *ops;
> + const struct cdns_pcie_ops *ops;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -299,69 +304,145 @@ struct cdns_pcie_ep {
> /* Register access */
> static inline void cdns_pcie_writeb(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg, u8 value)
> {
> - writeb(value, pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x1, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writeb(value, addr);
> }
>
> static inline void cdns_pcie_writew(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg, u16 value)
> {
> - writew(value, pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x2, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writew(value, addr);
> }
cdns_pcie_writeb and cdns_pcie_writew are used, so remove them.
>
> static inline void cdns_pcie_writel(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg, u32 value)
> {
> - writel(value, pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x4, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writel(value, addr);
writel isn't broken for you, so you don't need this either.
> }
>
> static inline u32 cdns_pcie_readl(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
> {
> - return readl(pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->read)
> + return pcie->ops->read(addr, 0x4);
> +
> + return readl(addr);
And neither is readl.
> }
>
> /* Root Port register access */
> static inline void cdns_pcie_rp_writeb(struct cdns_pcie *pcie,
> u32 reg, u8 value)
> {
> - writeb(value, pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x1, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writeb(value, addr);
> }
>
> static inline void cdns_pcie_rp_writew(struct cdns_pcie *pcie,
> u32 reg, u16 value)
> {
> - writew(value, pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x2, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writew(value, addr);
You removed 2 out of 3 calls to this. I think I'd just make the root
port writes always be 32-bit. It is all just one time init stuff
anyways.
Either rework the calls to assemble the data into 32-bits or keep these
functions and do the RMW here.
> }
>
> /* Endpoint Function register access */
> static inline void cdns_pcie_ep_fn_writeb(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u8 fn,
> u32 reg, u8 value)
> {
> - writeb(value, pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x1, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writeb(value, addr);
Same for these EP functions.
Unless there are places where doing a RMW is fundamentally broken like
in config space (not counting the one time init stuff).
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tom Joseph <tjoseph@cadence.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/14] PCI: cadence: Add support to use custom read and write accessors
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:07:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520220724.GA636352@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506151429.12255-4-kishon@ti.com>
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:44:18PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add support to use custom read and write accessors. Platforms that
> don't support half word or byte access or any other constraint
> while accessing registers can use this feature to populate custom
> read and write accessors. These custom accessors are used for both
> standard register access and configuration space register access of
> the PCIe host bridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h | 107 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Actually, take back my R-by...
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h
> index df14ad002fe9..70b6b25153e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.h
> @@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ enum cdns_pcie_msg_routing {
> MSG_ROUTING_GATHER,
> };
>
> +struct cdns_pcie_ops {
> + u32 (*read)(void __iomem *addr, int size);
> + void (*write)(void __iomem *addr, int size, u32 value);
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct cdns_pcie - private data for Cadence PCIe controller drivers
> * @reg_base: IO mapped register base
> @@ -239,7 +244,7 @@ struct cdns_pcie {
> int phy_count;
> struct phy **phy;
> struct device_link **link;
> - const struct cdns_pcie_common_ops *ops;
> + const struct cdns_pcie_ops *ops;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -299,69 +304,145 @@ struct cdns_pcie_ep {
> /* Register access */
> static inline void cdns_pcie_writeb(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg, u8 value)
> {
> - writeb(value, pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x1, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writeb(value, addr);
> }
>
> static inline void cdns_pcie_writew(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg, u16 value)
> {
> - writew(value, pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x2, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writew(value, addr);
> }
cdns_pcie_writeb and cdns_pcie_writew are used, so remove them.
>
> static inline void cdns_pcie_writel(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg, u32 value)
> {
> - writel(value, pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x4, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writel(value, addr);
writel isn't broken for you, so you don't need this either.
> }
>
> static inline u32 cdns_pcie_readl(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
> {
> - return readl(pcie->reg_base + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->read)
> + return pcie->ops->read(addr, 0x4);
> +
> + return readl(addr);
And neither is readl.
> }
>
> /* Root Port register access */
> static inline void cdns_pcie_rp_writeb(struct cdns_pcie *pcie,
> u32 reg, u8 value)
> {
> - writeb(value, pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x1, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writeb(value, addr);
> }
>
> static inline void cdns_pcie_rp_writew(struct cdns_pcie *pcie,
> u32 reg, u16 value)
> {
> - writew(value, pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_RP_BASE + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x2, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writew(value, addr);
You removed 2 out of 3 calls to this. I think I'd just make the root
port writes always be 32-bit. It is all just one time init stuff
anyways.
Either rework the calls to assemble the data into 32-bits or keep these
functions and do the RMW here.
> }
>
> /* Endpoint Function register access */
> static inline void cdns_pcie_ep_fn_writeb(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u8 fn,
> u32 reg, u8 value)
> {
> - writeb(value, pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) + reg);
> + void __iomem *addr = pcie->reg_base + CDNS_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) + reg;
> +
> + if (pcie->ops && pcie->ops->write) {
> + pcie->ops->write(addr, 0x1, value);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + writeb(value, addr);
Same for these EP functions.
Unless there are places where doing a RMW is fundamentally broken like
in config space (not counting the one time init stuff).
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 15:14 [PATCH v4 00/14] Add PCIe support to TI's J721E SoC Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] PCI: cadence: Fix cdns_pcie_{host|ep}_setup() error path Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 20:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 20:59 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] linux/kernel.h: Add PTR_ALIGN_DOWN macro Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 21:00 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 21:00 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] PCI: cadence: Add support to use custom read and write accessors Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 21:02 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 21:02 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 22:07 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2020-05-20 22:07 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-21 13:33 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-21 13:33 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-21 22:17 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-21 22:17 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-22 3:36 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-22 3:36 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] PCI: cadence: Add support to start link and verify link status Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 21:06 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 21:06 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] PCI: cadence: Add read/write accessors to perform only 32-bit accesses Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] PCI: cadence: Allow pci_host_bridge to have custom pci_ops Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] PCI: cadence: Add new *ops* for CPU addr fixup Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 21:34 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 21:34 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-21 11:34 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-21 11:34 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-22 16:45 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-22 16:45 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-23 1:24 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-23 1:24 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] PCI: cadence: Fix updating Vendor ID and Subsystem Vendor ID register Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 21:36 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 21:36 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] PCI: cadence: Add MSI-X support to Endpoint driver Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] dt-bindings: PCI: Add host mode dt-bindings for TI's J721E SoC Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] dt-bindings: PCI: Add EP " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] PCI: j721e: Add TI J721E PCIe driver Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add J721E in pci_device_id table Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-06 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] MAINTAINERS: Add Kishon Vijay Abraham I for TI J721E SoC PCIe Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-06 15:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-20 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-20 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-18 11:14 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] Add PCIe support to TI's J721E SoC Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2020-05-18 11:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200520220724.GA636352@bogus \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=tjoseph@cadence.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.