From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Fix group refcount in iommu_alloc_default_domain()
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:02:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525130253.GH5075@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200522130145.30067-1-saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Hi,
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:31:45PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index a4c2f122eb8b..05f7b77c432f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@ static int iommu_alloc_default_domain(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iommu_group *group;
> unsigned int type;
> + int ret;
>
> group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> if (!group)
> @@ -1501,7 +1502,11 @@ static int iommu_alloc_default_domain(struct device *dev)
>
> type = iommu_get_def_domain_type(dev);
>
> - return iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(dev->bus, group, type);
> + ret = iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(dev->bus, group, type);
> +
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**
Thanks for the report and the fix. I think it is better to fix this by
not taking a group reference in iommu_alloc_default_domain() at all and
pass group as a parameter. Please see the patch I just sent out.
Regards,
Joerg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Fix group refcount in iommu_alloc_default_domain()
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:02:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525130253.GH5075@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200522130145.30067-1-saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Hi,
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:31:45PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index a4c2f122eb8b..05f7b77c432f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@ static int iommu_alloc_default_domain(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iommu_group *group;
> unsigned int type;
> + int ret;
>
> group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> if (!group)
> @@ -1501,7 +1502,11 @@ static int iommu_alloc_default_domain(struct device *dev)
>
> type = iommu_get_def_domain_type(dev);
>
> - return iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(dev->bus, group, type);
> + ret = iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(dev->bus, group, type);
> +
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**
Thanks for the report and the fix. I think it is better to fix this by
not taking a group reference in iommu_alloc_default_domain() at all and
pass group as a parameter. Please see the patch I just sent out.
Regards,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Fix group refcount in iommu_alloc_default_domain()
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:02:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525130253.GH5075@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200522130145.30067-1-saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Hi,
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:31:45PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index a4c2f122eb8b..05f7b77c432f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@ static int iommu_alloc_default_domain(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct iommu_group *group;
> unsigned int type;
> + int ret;
>
> group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> if (!group)
> @@ -1501,7 +1502,11 @@ static int iommu_alloc_default_domain(struct device *dev)
>
> type = iommu_get_def_domain_type(dev);
>
> - return iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(dev->bus, group, type);
> + ret = iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(dev->bus, group, type);
> +
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**
Thanks for the report and the fix. I think it is better to fix this by
not taking a group reference in iommu_alloc_default_domain() at all and
pass group as a parameter. Please see the patch I just sent out.
Regards,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-25 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 13:01 [PATCH] iommu: Fix group refcount in iommu_alloc_default_domain() Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-22 13:01 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-22 13:01 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-25 13:02 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-05-25 13:02 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-25 13:02 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-25 13:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-25 13:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-05-25 13:10 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200525130253.GH5075@suse.de \
--to=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.