All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	allan.nielsen@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: read poll when high resolution timers are disabled
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 00:01:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526220127.GS768009@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e95bbdb6-a6db-be02-660e-7318b9bb5f01@gmail.com>

> > +/* When high resolution timers aren't built-in: we can't use usleep_range() as
> > + * we would sleep way too long. Use udelay() instead.
> > + */
> > +#define mscc_readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us)	\
> > +({									\
> > +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS))			\
> > +		readl_poll_timeout_atomic(addr, val, cond, delay_us,	\
> > +					  timeout_us);			\
> > +	readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us);	\
> > +})
> > +
> 
> I would make this a regular function which would not harm the compiler's
> ability to optimize it, but would give you type checking. With that fixed:

Hi Florian

cond makes that difficult, since it is not a parameter in the usual
sense, but an expression to evaluate if the polling should terminate.

readl_poll_timeout() and readl_poll_timeout_atomic() themselves are
#define's, and there are more levels of macros under them.

	   Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-26 16:22 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: reduce waiting time between MDIO transactions Antoine Tenart
2020-05-26 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: use more reasonable delays Antoine Tenart
2020-05-26 21:04   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-05-26 21:19   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-26 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: remove redundant timeout check Antoine Tenart
2020-05-26 21:04   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-05-26 21:19   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-26 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: improve waiting logic Antoine Tenart
2020-05-26 21:07   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-05-26 21:21   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-26 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: read poll when high resolution timers are disabled Antoine Tenart
2020-05-26 21:22   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-26 22:01     ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-05-26 22:05       ` Florian Fainelli
2020-05-26 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: phy: mscc-miim: reduce waiting time between MDIO transactions Andrew Lunn
2020-05-27  7:00   ` Antoine Tenart
2020-05-26 22:34 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526220127.GS768009@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.