All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc32: register memory occupied by kernel as memblock.memory
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 04:52:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527045219.GG48741@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200524165358.27188-1-rppt@kernel.org>

Andrew, David,

Any comments on this?

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:53:58PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> sparc32 never registered the memory occupied by the kernel image with
> memblock_add() and it only reserved this memory with meblock_reserve().
> 
> With openbios as system firmware, the memory occupied by the kernel is
> reserved in openbios and removed from mem.available. The prom setup code in
> the kernel uses mem.available to set up the memory banks and essentially
> there is a hole for the memory occupied by the kernel image.
> 
> Later in bootmem_init() this memory is memblock_reserve()d.
> 
> Up until recently, memmap initialization would call __init_single_page()
> for the pages in that hole, the free_low_memory_core_early() would mark
> them as reserved and everything would be Ok.
> 
> After the change in memmap initialization introduced by the commit "mm:
> memmap_init: iterate over memblock regions rather that check each PFN", the
> hole is skipped and the page structs for it are not initialized. And when
> they are passed from memblock to page allocator as reserved, the latter
> gets confused.
> 
> Simply registering the memory occupied by the kernel with memblock_add()
> resolves this issue.
> 
> Tested on qemu-system-sparc with Debian Etch [1] userspace.
> 
> [1] https://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/sparc/debian_etch_sparc_small.qcow2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200517000050.GA87467@roeck-us.nlllllet/ 
> ---
> 
> David,
> 
> I'd really appreciate your Ack or an explanation where my analysis is wrong :)
> 
>  arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c
> index e45160839f79..eb2946b1df8a 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ unsigned long __init bootmem_init(unsigned long *pages_avail)
>  	/* Reserve the kernel text/data/bss. */
>  	size = (start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - phys_base;
>  	memblock_reserve(phys_base, size);
> +	memblock_add(phys_base, size);
>  
>  	size = memblock_phys_mem_size() - memblock_reserved_size();
>  	*pages_avail = (size >> PAGE_SHIFT) - high_pages;
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc32: register memory occupied by kernel as memblock.memory
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 07:52:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527045219.GG48741@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200524165358.27188-1-rppt@kernel.org>

Andrew, David,

Any comments on this?

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:53:58PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> sparc32 never registered the memory occupied by the kernel image with
> memblock_add() and it only reserved this memory with meblock_reserve().
> 
> With openbios as system firmware, the memory occupied by the kernel is
> reserved in openbios and removed from mem.available. The prom setup code in
> the kernel uses mem.available to set up the memory banks and essentially
> there is a hole for the memory occupied by the kernel image.
> 
> Later in bootmem_init() this memory is memblock_reserve()d.
> 
> Up until recently, memmap initialization would call __init_single_page()
> for the pages in that hole, the free_low_memory_core_early() would mark
> them as reserved and everything would be Ok.
> 
> After the change in memmap initialization introduced by the commit "mm:
> memmap_init: iterate over memblock regions rather that check each PFN", the
> hole is skipped and the page structs for it are not initialized. And when
> they are passed from memblock to page allocator as reserved, the latter
> gets confused.
> 
> Simply registering the memory occupied by the kernel with memblock_add()
> resolves this issue.
> 
> Tested on qemu-system-sparc with Debian Etch [1] userspace.
> 
> [1] https://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/sparc/debian_etch_sparc_small.qcow2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200517000050.GA87467@roeck-us.nlllllet/ 
> ---
> 
> David,
> 
> I'd really appreciate your Ack or an explanation where my analysis is wrong :)
> 
>  arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c
> index e45160839f79..eb2946b1df8a 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ unsigned long __init bootmem_init(unsigned long *pages_avail)
>  	/* Reserve the kernel text/data/bss. */
>  	size = (start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - phys_base;
>  	memblock_reserve(phys_base, size);
> +	memblock_add(phys_base, size);
>  
>  	size = memblock_phys_mem_size() - memblock_reserved_size();
>  	*pages_avail = (size >> PAGE_SHIFT) - high_pages;
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-27  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-24 16:53 [PATCH] sparc32: register memory occupied by kernel as memblock.memory Mike Rapoport
2020-05-24 16:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-05-27  4:52 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2020-05-27  4:52   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-05-27  5:58   ` David Miller
2020-05-27  5:58     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200527045219.GG48741@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.